Steve Brunec

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Regime Media is still pretending that this doesn’t exist…

Dutch Lawyer Peter Stassen just dragged Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Mark Rutte into a Netherlands Civil Court to answer for the COVID narrative that pushed the public into experimental injections.

PLEASE SHARE EVERYWHERE

[Steve Brunec @stevebrunec]

@KatyKray73 He’s a spineless little weasel

[Steve Brunec @stevebrunec]

Yes 🧨

[K.A.F.K.A (Official) @KAFKA_Dev]

Dit is advocaat Peter Stassen!
De ENIGE advocaat ter wereld die Bill Gates, Rutte & de CEO van Pfizer voor de RECHTER durft te brengen vanwege hun MISDADEN tijdens corona!
Peter is een HELD!

Eens?

[Rosita Díaz @RositaDaz48]

“This post needs to go viral – NOW!
So, as you might have heard, Australia’s controversial Digital ID bill was recently passed in Federal Parliament.
And no, this isn’t about logging into Medicare “more easily.” This is the wet dream of every power-drunk bureaucrat who’s ever fantasised about tracking what you eat, watch, spend, say – and even think.
Labor rammed it through with help from the Greens and Jacqui Lambie, while the likes of Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Matthew Canavan, Ralph Babet, Alex Antic and Gerard Rennick strongly opposed it.
Experts lined up to say it was dangerous. Legal groups shredded it. Privacy advocates screamed. The public wasn’t consulted. But they damn well passed it anyway.
This bill is not about “protecting your identity” – it’s about owning it.
Without a digital ID, you will eventually have no access to a bank account, cash, Centrelink, MyGov, flights, fuel, medication, voting in elections, and even receiving parcels in the mail.
And you can kiss goodbye to ever renting a home, owning a car, using social media, shopping online, accessing the internet at all, having a phone number, and buying groceries.
They say it’s “voluntary” – just like MyGov was “optional” until 10 million Aussies were forced into it just to access basic services.
Just like the COVID-19 vaccine was “optional” until those who resisted found themselves locked out of society for months for not being up-to-date with their boosters.
It’s coercion and blackmail with a friendly smile.
And now that this thing’s been jammed through Parliament, the tech giants are lining up like pigs at a data trough. They’ve already got your search history, your online purchases, your late-night Instagram habits, and every whispered “Hey Siri” or “OK Google.”
Now they get to attach all of that to your real name, address, and government-approved ID. That “anonymous data” you thought was floating harmlessly in the cloud? Not anymore.
Your Woolies reward card is now part of your permanent “consumer profile.” Your YouTube comments? Traceable. That shady dating app you thought was private? Good luck with that when your real ID is stitched to everything you do online.
Privacy’s gone, and it’s not coming back. And let's not pretend this data won't be regularly hacked, leaked, or sold to the highest bidder.
And when the system inevitably fails? One blackout, one outage, one “oops” from some contractor, and you’re digitally locked out of your own life, while some AI bot in a call centre tells you to try turning it off and on again.
The committee that was supposed to scrutinise this bill was a total joke. They ignored almost every expert submission, skipped past glaring privacy failures, human rights concerns, and technical red flags, and still gave it the green light.
It wasn’t an inquiry – it was a rubber stamp for the surveillance state controlled by foreign nations.
Every politician who voted for this has just helped build the scaffolding for digital tyranny. This is the infrastructure for a fully centralised, always-on tracking system.
They’ll say it’s for your safety. They’ll say it’s about efficiency. What they mean is: now they know who you are, where you are, what you’re saying, who you’re saying it to, and how to shut you up when you speak too much truth.
#This isn’t progress – it’s control, plain and simple.
What we’re seeing isn’t some harmless upgrade – it’s China-style social credit wrapped in an Aussie flag, and you can bet the CCP is watching on proudly, noticing how we've finally caught up.

#StephanieMessenger

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

The people now demanding we “lower the temperature” of political debate are the same ones who spent years calling anyone who questioned Net Zero a “climate denier” — and equating them with Holocaust deniers.

They branded anyone who challenged Fauci’s COVID policies as a spreader of “dangerous disinformation” putting lives at risk.

They labelled anyone right of centre a “far-right extremist.”

They called anyone who opposed importing a net million people into Australia in just two years a “racist.”

And they smeared One Nation supporters as “Nazis.”

These are the same people now pushing for governments to create fake online “sock puppet” accounts to spread official propaganda.

They don’t want a cooler debate. They want a one-sided one.

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

HEROES in the Netherlands 🏆

Lawyer Peter Strassen receives a monumental welcome as he takes on Pandemic Planners Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Mark Rutte in the Netherlands Civil Court Case…

[katy 🌸 @KatyKray73]

The govt has now sunk to a new low by pairing censorship with the coordinated use of sock-puppet accounts to manufacture consent, drown out critics, and distort public debate.

This is an active campaign of narrative control: counteracting voices are throttled or removed while official talking points are amplified by networks of fake profiles that create the illusion of agreement.

The longer these tactics continue, the more ordinary citizens learn to discount official statements and treat every sudden online consensus as potentially staged.

The remaining question is no longer whether the line has been crossed, but how much further the govt is willing to go, how many more speech restrictions, how many more synthetic voices, and how much more of our freedoms suppressed.

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

“COVID-19 injections are LETHAL.”

“The global deployment of this biological weapon can only take place through the UNLAWFUL deception of the public on a global scale.”

[katy 🌸 @KatyKray73]

Albanese says people need to “do a bit better” and “be like Helen” as communities hold vigils for independent MP Helen Haines.

He was then asked if that applies to everyone, after a journalist noted he had recently called Angus Taylor an “idiot.”

The PM has form for hostile language in Parliament: he called out “smash her!” while a colleague questioned Sussan Ley, and in 2024 he asked opposition MPs (including Taylor) if they had Tourette’s (“babble, babble, babble”).

If anyone needs to set a better example on civil discourse, it’s the Prime Minister. (His office also recently circulated a “dirt sheet” on Haines herself.) What a disgrace he is!

[Steve Brunec @stevebrunec]

@KatyKray73 🖕🏽= F**k Off

[Steve Brunec @stevebrunec]

@KatyKray73 He is a disgrace

[Ben Fordham Live @BenFordhamLive]

The Bureau of Meteorology has landed itself in another scandal.

They’ve admitted to publishing incorrect temperature readings.

One expert is convinced the data has been manipulated.

Listen to the details HERE.

🎧https://t.co/c0qceppumm🎧

[katy 🌸 @KatyKray73]

PM Albanese: “There is no place for violence in Australia and we all have a responsibility to turn the temperature down.”

Agreed! It’s time for Albanese to start addressing the rise of the far-left!

[Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP @CartlandDavid]

👇

[Ben Fordham Live @BenFordhamLive]

The Bureau of Meteorology has landed itself in another scandal.

They’ve admitted to publishing incorrect temperature readings.

One expert is convinced the data has been manipulated.

Listen to the details HERE.

https://t.co/NhAe2pvHom

[Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 @RobSchneider]

AUSSIE TWAT @AnikaWells NEEDS CENSORSHIP TO HIDE HER OWN CORRUPTION!! PROSECUTE THE
BI-AHTCH

[Steve Brunec @stevebrunec]

@IfindRetards F**k right off d**khead

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

Large tracts of Europe are lost.

Australia is sleep walking directly into the same trap.

[Steve Brunec @stevebrunec]

@KatyKray73 Little Cretin…

[Ryan Dally @Ryandally08]

BREAKING: THE BIGGEST CLIMATE SCANDAL IN AUSTRALIAN HISTORY

The Albanese Labor Government has just been caught red handed. New forensic evidence suggests they are using a compromised Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) to fabricate a climate crisis that simply does not exist.

A explosive forensic audit led by investigator Tom Berger and retired scientist Geoff Sherrington has uncovered widespread, systematic errors and fake readings within the BOM’s raw climate data.

We aren't talking about minor glitches, we are talking about copy and pasted data designed to make the past look cooler and the present look warmer.

The audit exposed blatant data manipulation at the Sydney Observatory:
•The Fabricated Data: Minimum temperatures from August 1907 were found completely duplicated and inserted into the August 1867 record.
•The Cover-Up: The Australian fact-checked the National Archives and confirmed this "double-up" does not exist in the original handwritten records. The online data used to justify sweeping climate policies is completely wrong.

For years, the BOM has operated on a “trust us” basis. Dr David Evans, the scientist who built Australia’s carbon accounting software, warns that this “secret climate business” mirrors the worst days of fraudulent medical drug trials, where researchers were under immense pressure to exaggerate results to fit a narrative.

Labor is terrified of an independent audit because they know their Net Zero house of cards will collapse if the public sees the real numbers.

Dr Jennifer Marohasy confirmed that outside of Adelaide, there has been no proper audit of Australia's weather stations.

If our historical data is corrupted with fake inputs, the AI forecasting models used for future planning become entirely useless.

The Albanese Government doesn't want the data audited because the data doesn't support their narrative.

They are destroying our economy, killing our energy grid, and forcing Net Zero targets on regular Australians based on copy and pasted climate fiction.

The question is simple, if the records are sound, why is Labor so opposed to an independent audit?