What’s wrong with being intolerant?
Every time I hear about something which I have an opinion on (and I have lots of opinions) I have to check my reaction in my head, is my reaction racist? Not sure, don’t say anything then.
Is my reaction bigoted? Not sure, don’t say anything then.
Is my reaction going to offend someone anywhere in the world? Not sure, don’t say anything then.
After all, I don’t want to come across as being intolerant!!
You know the narrative, if you are intolerant of even one thing in the world, no matter what it is, then you are on the whole a nasty, intolerant, racist, xenophobic, homophobic and anythingelseophobic piece of scum.
Being ‘infinitely tolerant’=good, being in any way intolerant of anything=evil.
It’s polar and that’s it, no balance, no in between. You have to be infinitely tolerant of everything otherwise you are an intolerant person. And like the ‘Knights who say ni’, you don’t want to be called ‘intolerant’ do you??
But what is wrong with being intolerant? Does being intolerant of bad behaviour make me an intolerant person? Of course it does. By definition it does. In that case I’m quite happy to say that I’m an intolerant person.
The reality is we are all intolerant AND tolerant, and we should be quite happy with that. And there is absolutely no need to keep pushing to be ‘infinitely tolerant’ of everything in order to virtue signal to your friends how ‘more’ tolerant of everything you are than they are.
So I put it to you that we should actually be openly intolerant and we should be quite happy to say that we are intolerant.
We should be –
Intolerant of murderers.
Intolerant of rapists and gang rapists.
Intolerant of peadophiles.
Intolerant of ideological/religious fundamentalists (people willing to murder for their ideas).
Intolerant of people who are invited into our country who then work to destroy our country.
Intolerant of those who condone the above in the name of ‘infinite tolerance’.
We SHOULD be happy to be intolerant………and we should be proud of that.
Of course in some ways this is half a story, we can’t be ‘intolerant’ of everything but equally we should not be ‘tolerant’ of everything, and I think we’ve gone too far in allowing the narrative of ‘infinite tolerance’ to influence our decisions.
As a community we need to decide what we are tolerant of and what we are intolerant of and I thought we decided that with our laws.
Unfortunately, more and more, I see our laws being pushed aside in favour of this ‘infinitely tolerant’ narrative. Even some of our judges, with their decision making, seem to be enthralled to this ‘ideology’?
So please help push the counter narrative.
It really is ok to be intolerant and it really is important that we try to stop this ‘ideological falsehood’ that in order to be ‘good’ you have to be ‘infinitely tolerant’.
You don’t and you shouldn’t.
It is GOOD to be intolerant and stand up to bad behaviours which are prevalent in our society, and you SHOULD be proud of that.
Wiltshire Police has been taken to court for marching under the Pride flag. Officers didn't simply attend a local event; they marched in uniform, wore trans-themed lanyards, and ran stalls under political banners. This was not policing. It was participation in an ideological campaign. And that distinction matters more than most people realise.
Because what's unfolding here is part of a toxic revolution that has spread through every British institution – one that preaches equality but demands obedience. What used to be the impartial machinery of state has been captured from within by a new orthodoxy: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion – the soft language of the hard Left.
This is how a nation is hollowed out. Not by riots or coups, but by bureaucrats with clipboards and slogans. It begins with the soft phrases – "be kind," "celebrate difference," "diversity is our strength" – the moral lullabies of a movement that masks coercion as compassion. Then come the symbols – rainbows painted across patrol cars, the oath replaced by the lanyard. And finally, the inversion: neutrality becomes "hate," disagreement becomes "extremism," and those who refuse to accept the creed are cast out as enemies of progress.
Pride has become the state's moral test. Refusal to affirm it is treated as heresy. When police forces sponsor Pride zones and hand out stickers, they aren't serving the community – they're serving the creed. They're telling every citizen with gender-critical, conservative, or religious beliefs that their views are now beneath protection.
Sarah Phillimore, a family law barrister and co-founder of the free speech group Fair Cop, has spent years exposing how British policing has drifted from enforcing the law to enforcing ideology. Her challenge to Wiltshire Police is about more than one parade. It's about who governs Britain – the law, or the ideology that has replaced it. When judges have to remind police forces that impartiality is a legal duty, not a lifestyle choice, you know the system is rotting from within.
Every captured institution follows the same pattern: moral cause becomes policy, policy becomes dogma, and dogma becomes law. The NHS waves flags. The BBC manufactures narrative and calls it news. Our universities churn out zealots instead of thinkers. The police enforce feelings. A state once anchored in reason now runs on emotional coercion.
This is what capture looks like in the twenty-first century – not uniforms and salutes, but hashtags and training slides. It's control sold as compassion. And every time the police march under a political banner, the message is clear: allegiance to ideology now outranks allegiance to law.
The revolution happened in daylight. Most people mistook it for kindness. But behind the rainbows lies something colder – a bureaucracy that no longer serves the public, only itself.
It can still be undone, but only if the public stops apologising for wanting neutrality. The police have no business picking sides in moral crusades. Their badge should mean justice, not fashion. Because when the state kneels to ideology, the citizen kneels next.
"Sarah Phillimore, a family law barrister and co-founder of the free speech group Fair Cop, has spent years exposing how British policing has drifted from enforcing the law to enforcing ideology."
Henry Nowak was stabbed, murdered, & handcuffed because he was white.
These are the consequences of turning the other cheek.
Your children end up paying the price.
I believe all lives matter. However…
What was done to Iryna Zarutska was beyond heartbreaking. Afterwards, the savage who stabbed her said “I got that white bitch.” Also, while she was bleeding out, the people around her did nothing.
What was done to Henry Nowak was legitimate injustice. The cops were way more afraid to be seen as racist than they were to enforce the law.
Besides, wearing this shirt would piss off the right people, so I think it’s funny.
Reason I don’t wear a Black Lives Matter shirt is because no one wearing that shirt would give a rat’s ass if my black conservatarian ass died. Speaks to a larger problem than just “black lives.”
I felt compelled to finally speak about my viral Heathrow Airport tweets from last year, where the entire Indian Press descended upon me because I confronted the Indian foreign workers at Heathrow Airport for NOT speaking in English whilst working in a public facing role.
Indians will call you racist because they want bad things to happen to you.
Their clan culture to protect their reputation above all else, 'Izzat', explains this.
This culture is not compatible with our British way of life. Millions must go.
My message to White men & White women.
Get up. Get fit. Go to the gym. Get active. Stand tall. Correct your posture. Be confident. Read books. Learn history. Get smarter. Be articulate. Speak properly. Dress well. Get serious. Get organised. Get ready.
REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE.
If sanity is ever restored to the UK, Tommy Robinson should be knighted as a savior of the realm. Without his relentless reportage and activism, the madness of the Starmer tyranny would never have been exposed.
I genuinely can't fathom a mindset that watched the Henry Nowak video, and then thought 'let's ignore all that and have a pop at Farage instead'. Utterly disturbing.
Watch this brilliant TV moment.
An arrogant British TV presenter tried to humiliate an American commentator and immediately regretted it.
He insisted that American and British people enjoy diversity and multiculturalism and claimed the most significant threats they face are online hate speech and unregulated information on social media platforms like X.
She destroyed his false narrative on the spot. Do you agree with her?
These scum bag politicians are appalling. Two-tier policing is literally in the police code. The audacity to go after Farage for speaking the truth is a disgrace. They’re more upset with him than about the murder. Starmer is a nasty, nasty piece of work
WHITE LIVES MATTER ✊🏼🤍
My life matters, the lives of my White family & White friends matter & the lives of my people all across the Western world matter.
I will NEVER forgive the antiwhite globalists, the antiwhite governments, the Mainstream Media & all of the antiwhites that have caused so much unnecessary pain, suffering, harm & the deaths of so many of my people all across the West.
There will be justice.
There will be a reckoning.
After Henry Nowak Tragedy, Peter Hitchens Makes Controversial Call to Abolish Britain’s Entire Police Force and Start Again
“I have to say it’s been a long time since I’ve thought or imagined for a moment that I would ever say, “Oh, great. The police have arrived.” It’s astounding to me how long it has taken our society to notice the disaster which has happened to the police.”
Hitchens, a long-time critic of Britain’s broken policing system, doesn’t mince words on the solution:
“My position has been now for some time… The only thing we can do now is to create a new police force on sound principles and train it and as soon as it’s ready abolish and dismiss all the existing police forces which are totally useless and could not by any effort or any will of man be turned into anything that was useful. They all need to go off and do something else.”
This isn’t the left-wing ‘defund the police’ idea. It’s a conservative call to scrap the broken system and start again from scratch, end two-tier policing and go back to the original basics of good policing: preventing crime before it happens, having officers who are part of the local community, and policing that ordinary people actually support.
I have written to Hampshire Police:
1) The body-cam footage directly contradicts the public statement made by Deputy Chief Constable Robert France.
DCC France claimed officers lacked "all of the information" and that Henry's injuries were hidden and internal.
The footage shows the opposite.
Before officers even handcuffed Henry, they were explicitly warned by a the murderer’s father that he had a "mouth full of blood" and couldn't hold himself up.
Henry himself clearly tells officers: "He stabbed me, I've been stabbed, I can't breathe."
The arresting officer's response?
"I don't think you have mate."
Henry was dragged across a driveway, handcuffed as a suspect rather than treated as a victim, and died minutes later. Judge Mousley KC’s sentencing remarks confirm Henry had a "clearly visible facial wound."
DCC France’s statement is misleading, indefensible, and a potential breach of Police Conduct Regulations.
2) DCC France’s statement implies that the police considered it justifiable to take what was claimed by an ethnic minority family as absolute fact.
Upon being presented with a man that has a "mouth full of blood", that "keeps dropping side to side" and repeats "I've been stabbed, l've been stabbed, I can't breathe, the arresting officer's response was "I don't think you have mate."
Attending officers had more than enough information to treat Henry as the victim, not the suspect.
Hampshire Police’s "Race Action Plan" embeds anti-white racism in its operations, which today’s reports in The Times reveal has left rank-and-file officers feeling "controlled and pressured."
The Police Race Action Plan, launched under the Tory Government, demands that Police Officers “(do) not treat everyone the same”, nor be “colour blind”.
The public deserves to know:
How has this plan operationalised policing?
We need answers.
WE WILL NOT LET THIS REST
Complete insanity in the United Kingdom. The calls for @Keir_Starmer to be immediately removed for allowing this once great nation to go into the toilet are not only righteous but necessary.
Henry Nowak may he R. I. P.
Ideological conditioning and two-tiered policing are glaring symptoms of civilizational decline. They must be rejected across the West.
The United States sends our condolences to the family of Henry Nowak and the people of the United Kingdom at this troubling time.