Introducing ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ต: agent skills that orchestrate a population of independent research agents for autonomous discovery.
SwarmResearch achieves over 2ร the throughput of vanilla autoresearch when designing speculative decoding implementations. While autoresearch gets stuck refining locally optimal approaches, SwarmResearch continues to explore diverse approaches after 11 hours.
Repo: https://t.co/ft7U6JEr2W
Weโre happy to release ๐๐๐-๐๐๐ง๐๐ก ๐๐ซ๐จ: a benchmark for measuring the bug-hunting capabilities of AI agents in critical software systems such as Chromium V8, Firefox SpiderMonkey, and more.
Explore the details here: https://t.co/gIMnS4Oohx
@slimshetty_@LingmingZhang Also feel free to check out the paper for more detailed analysis. We have a whole bunch of examples and results looking at the different tools agents generate!
@slimshetty_@LingmingZhang Cool question! For Gemini-3-Pro, it mainly creates tools that are well-suited for analyzing the repo (e.g., read/search/write files). There are also task-specific ones like creating edit tools that apply targted patches that are quite difficult to do via bash commands only.
๐คฏ๐คฏ๐คฏ Gemini 3 Pro + Live-SWE-agent hits 77.4% on SWE-bench Verified, beating ALL existing models, including Claude 4.5!!
๐ค Live-SWE-agent is the first live software agent that autonomously self-evolves on the fly โ and it even outperforms the manually engineered scaffold used by the Gemini 3 Pro team (76.2%)
๐ Introducing Live-SWE-agent:
๐ค An autonomous coding agent that self-evolves on the fly while solving real-world issues.
โจ Simplistic design: no offline training, no heavy workflows.
๐ Surprising gains:
๐ 75.4% on SWE-bench Verified
๐ 45.8% on SWE-Bench Pro (new SOTA!)
We're releasing a new iteration of SWE-bench, in collaboration with the original authors, to more reliably evaluate AI models on their ability to solve real-world software issues. https://t.co/qJuLpCdSWJ
I'm on the way to USENIX Security'24. We will present one paper about privacy-preserving app authentication. I'm also happy to discuss TEE-based AI security and other AI-related security topics. If you're interested, please get in touch with me! #usenix#USESEC2024
Introducing OpenAutoCoder-Agentless๐บ:
A simple agentless solution solves 27.3% GitHub issues on SWE-bench Lite with ~$0.34 each, outperforming all open-source AI SW agents!
It's fully open-source, try it out:
๐งโ๐ปhttps://t.co/AKyiZhmi7B
๐https://t.co/Oc4QCaQult
Magicoder: Source Code Is All You Need
paper page: https://t.co/ZeZH3PIXln
introduce Magicoder, a series of fully open-source (code, weights, and data) Large Language Models (LLMs) for code that significantly closes the gap with top code models while having no more than 7B parameters. Magicoder models are trained on 75K synthetic instruction data using OSS-Instruct, a novel approach to enlightening LLMs with open-source code snippets to generate high-quality instruction data for code. Our main motivation is to mitigate the inherent bias of the synthetic data generated by LLMs by empowering them with a wealth of open-source references for the production of more diverse, realistic, and controllable data. The orthogonality of OSS-Instruct and other data generation methods like Evol-Instruct further enables us to build an enhanced MagicoderS. Both Magicoder and MagicoderS substantially outperform state-of-the-art code models with similar or even larger sizes on a wide range of coding benchmarks, including Python text-to-code generation, multilingual coding, and data-science program completion. Notably, MagicoderS-CL-7B based on CodeLlama even surpasses the prominent ChatGPT on HumanEval+ (66.5 vs. 65.9 in pass@1). Overall, OSS-Instruct opens a new direction for low-bias and high-quality instruction tuning using abundant open-source references.
In the past 6-mon release of HumanEval+ we have been improving its toolchain usability and dataset quality from v0.1.0 to v0.1.7 releases.
๐ฅ Now we release MBPP+, a new benchmark in EvalPlus v0.2.0: https://t.co/2vUM9b38s7
๐งต
Introducing the EvalPlus leaderboard! https://t.co/H0aOtkzbnc
๐ฅ28 models have been evaluated on coding HumanEval & HumanEval+
๐ฅ7B CodeLlama outperforms ~16B models e.g. StarCoder&CodeGen
๐ฅPhind-CodeLlama-34B-v2 and WizardCoder-Python-34B-V1 as open models both beat ChatGPT
๐งต
We welcome everyone to try out ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ+! A dataset to reflect the "real" correctness of LLM-generated code.
Using๐๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ+ is the same as HumanEval. You can easily pip install it and evaluate in our prepared sandbox (optional). https://t.co/96YcDvNJpm
๐จ Evaluating LLM-generated code on datasets with just "3 test-cases" is NOT enough! ๐จ
We built โจHumanEval+โจ: improving HumanEval with up to thousands of new tests to fully evaluate functional correctness of LLM generated code!
@JiaweiLiu_@YuyaoStarling@LingmingZhang