Stephen Larkin

Never get so busy making a living that you forget to make a life. If you think adventure is dangerous, try routine, its lethal. Travel is always a good idea.

[Ben Habib @BackBrexitBen]

The British state has lost control of the border, so now it wants control of your thoughts.

RICU is the Home Office unit used to shape narratives, brief the media, monitor speech and manage public anger after attacks involving terrorism, migration and race.

Just think about that. When people are furious, the state does not ask why. It asks how to calm them down, shut them up, and make sure the “right” story is told.

From Belfast to Southampton, from grooming gangs to "non-crime hate incidents" the ruling class is not trying to solve the crisis. It is trying to control the reaction.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

📛THE MIDNIGHT PANOPTICON: Starmer to announce tomorrow total social media ban for under 16s, AI bans for under 18s as he also unveils mandatory nightly digital curfews for teens 17 and under📛

We have weeks - mere months - to smash this digital iron curtain!

The entire nation is being dragged into a state run panopticon because 30-odd thousand moronic, lazy, and pathetic parents refused to raise their own kids. Your cowardice just doomed everyone else's freedom, and you are utterly disgusting!

Wake the hell up and understand what this means!

Starmer's upcoming social media edict is the definitive death rattle of British liberty, a chilling milestone where the state officially nationalises your children and liquidates the concept of parental authority.

Under the guise of a benevolent 'protection' racket, the Labour government will legally bar anyone under sixteen from ten major digital platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube.

But the true, mask-off authoritarianism lies in the regimes treatment of sixteen and seventeen year olds, who will be subjected to a mandatory, state enforced nightly social media curfew, locking them out of the digital world from 9pm to 7am.

And the ultimate hypocrisy of the system. Under the Representation of the People Bill, the government claims 16 and 17 year olds are mature enough to vote, pay taxes, and shape the geopolitical future of the United Kingdom, yet simultaneously argues they are too fragile to choose their own bedtime on the internet.

To round out this corporate-state panopticon, the government is completely banning under 18s from specific AI chatbots and stripping apps of basic features like disappearing messages and livestreaming.

The sheer, suffocating dystopia of this policy is found not in what it bans, but in how it must be enforced. To police a nightly digital curfew for near adults, the state cannot rely on an honour system; it requires total, invasive, and inescapable biometric surveillance.

Every single citizen, regardless of age, will soon be forced to scan their face, upload government identification, or surrender biometric data just to access the foundational infrastructure of the modern internet. By weaponising a media-stoked moral panic to convince 'nine out of ten' terrified parents (the 30-odd thousand moronic parents who responded to the consultation) to beg for their own subjugation, the Starmer regime has executed the Hegelian script flawlessly.

They allowed algorithmic poison to fester, waited for the public to scream for a saviour, and are now delivering the ultimate trap: a permanent digital passport system where the state controls your face, your identity, and your right to communicate after dark.

[Chay Bowes @BowesChay]

Remember, just like the Biolabs- Organ harvesting in Ukriane was all Russian propaganda?

Right?

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

🚨🇬🇧THE "ELON" FACTOR: Starmer’s Censorship Hits the Wall as US Tech Giants Intervene!
The emergency legal injunction from No. 10 didn't just fail—it backfired on a global scale. As Keir Starmer’s team worked through the night to "scrub" the Katie Hopkins video from UK servers, a massive response came from across the ocean.
Late last night, a major US tech platform (X) officially declined to comply with the British "D-Notice," citing First Amendment protections. Within hours, the banned footage was "pinned" to the top of every feed, rendering the UK censorship order completely useless. Katie Hopkins appeared on a massive US news broadcast, laughing at the attempt to silence her: "Keir, you forgot one thing—the internet doesn't have a border, and freedom of speech is a global currency."
While Starmer faces a diplomatic nightmare with Washington over "Digital Sovereignty," Nigel Farage has landed in Parliament Square, welcoming the first wave of protesters. The "Digital Iron Curtain" that Starmer tried to build has been torn down by a single click from Silicon Valley. The Saturday rally isn't just about Katie anymore—it’s now a global movement for the right to speak.

@ScaryEurope

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

oh … polling staff say family voting did happen and their staff were abused when they tried to stop it.

But this can’t be right? because ‘trusted’ journalists, political commentators, politicians AND the police said that family voting hadn’t happened and it was just far right propaganda.

The only way to stop this sort of disinformation is to ban social media.
Then the public would never know (see what I did there?)

[Ben Scallan 🇮🇪 @Ben_Scallan]

Not one liberal politician or journalist argued that the George Floyd "I can't breathe" clip shouldn't have been shared. They only want to stop you seeing the Belfast clip because it's massively, massively inconvenient to them - 'sensitivity for victims' has zilch to do with it.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨

They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!

Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!

They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.

The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.

If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.

🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!

The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.

Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.

1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.

2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.

3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.

4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.

💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.

They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.

📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).

🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.

🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.

💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.

Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.

Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.

FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.

So, what shall we do folks!?

New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

[Jonathan Wong @WONGthink]

No jail for brown man; two years for white man. Robinson has a clean record, not even a parking ticket.

Two 21-year-olds, two riots, two-tier justice ⚖️

[Stephen Larkin @StevoLarkin]

@ZackPolanski @elonmusk

[Stephen Larkin @StevoLarkin]

@ZackPolanski When the awful actions of individuals become frequent and commonplace & those individuals invariably belong to the same 'group of people' as you describe them, then it is incumbent upon right thinking people & politicians to call them out instead of gaslighting us. Musk is right.

[Dr Philip Kiszely @KiszelyPhilip]

We’re at the stage now where beheadings are regrettable, but tweets are unforgivable.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨Welcome to England… where we can’t fly our flag incase we upset migrants and those who hate us.

Yes you read that correctly 🤡

[Nick Buckley MBE @NickBuckleyMBE]

I’m angry. My country is dying. And the worst thing about it is that many of my fellow citizens don’t seem to care and are actively promoting Britain’s demise.

I am not allowed to care. I am not allowed to have a say on who comes to my country - none of us have ever been allowed.

Cheap foreign labour is a drug that the establishment is hooked on.

Illegal immigration is worth billions and many businesses are making a fortune, which then helps fund political parties and campaigns.

Everyone in the U.K. has the right to be whatever they wish to be, except white straight men. We are the enemy.

All I want is my country back. The one my ancestors fought for and died for. The one they left for me. The one I will leave to my children.

The left wing view of the world and foreigners is based on feelings, not reality.

Foreigners are not the same as us. The French are not the same as us, nevermind Africans and Asians.

Britain is for the British. This was not controversial a decade ago. We need to get back to valuing the nation state and it’s citizens.

[Burnside @BurnsideWasTosh]

Well the pattern is now set:

Atrocity
Condemn in weakest terms possible
Calls for calm
Angry scenes
Family of victim used
Full force of the law
New laws limiting everyone's freedom
Ignore problem that caused atrocity

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

A Government that's more concerned about Elon Musk than murderous third world migrants attempting to behead us in the street.

The Labour Party is a disgrace.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Restore Britain now or the next generation will never know the freedoms we lost for them.

[Citizen Journalists @citizenjournos_]

It's a movement, you see. That's a fancy way of saying, this is an organised cabal of authoritarians who seek to impost digital IDs on the internet. They don't like that we get to see and hear news that they can't control.

[Ben Habib @BackBrexitBen]

After the horrific attempted beheading in Belfast, Labour’s answer is to amend the Online Safety Act and force social media platforms to remove content faster during “times of crisis”.

Not fix the border. Not answer the public. Not restore trust. But instead censor the reaction. They do not want answers, they want total control.

[Ben Habib @benhabib6]

Starmer’s reaction to the attempted beheading of a British citizen by a Sundanese barbarian:

Tighten free speech laws so we cannot complain.

He should be on trial along with the barbarian.

[Sam McBride @SJAMcBride]

Belfast knife attack suspect Hadi Alodid was granted asylum under a fast-track application scheme introduced by two of Nigel Farage's senior colleagues. It meant he'd only to complete a Home Office questionnaire rather than attend a face-to-face interview. https://t.co/DhOJSLSv8w