@MgGiven@Khethiwe_Kat3 I really thought it was weird that he would interject and not afford Adv. Mnisi the opportunity to get an answer from the witness. This has been a trend though, when witnesses are cornered he finds a way to misconstrue the defenses questions and goes on a tangent.
@OscarMabuela@Timeislessl If the states case is proven to have several irregularities... that throws the case, in normal circumstances. The defence just needs to show doubt.
@OscarMabuela@Timeislessl Can't it be that they're trying to hit two birds with one stone? 1. Proving the original documents were altered 2. Proving the time of the incident being earlier than stated when looking at the calls/communication
@Timeislessl These lawyers are weak. You would think they're going to have a field day with the person on the stand but they end up going around in circles confusing themselves. Yes the judge is seemingly baised but they're just too weak.