Here is your chance to tell the govt that a post-coronavirus economic recovery has to be built around renewable energy and divest from fossil fuels.
Take action here: https://t.co/cPstoMbIcE
@ClarkeMicah@mailplus ...because they were a threat. You are confusing strategies to gain and exercise power with ideology in a way so simplistic, basic and lazy most KS3 pupils can see is wrong. Please pick up a history book before embarrassing yourself like this. 3/3
@ClarkeMicah@mailplus This is flatly false. Having communists in your rank doesn't mean left-wing. Look at their policies and ideology. Even https://t.co/dKs7dPC7XC states "Hitler crushed the Nazi Party’s left, or socialist-oriented, wing in 1934, executing Ernst Röhm". Diff between gaining support...
@ClarkeMicah@mailplus ...and actually implementing policies and ideologies. The party were adept at flirting with different causes to further their power and strategically position leaders as allies to buy time and build plans. Just like with Britain in 1938. And with Russia who they then attacked 2/3
This a new low. It's an egregious & despicable lie. The Nazis were notoriously *right* wing, as were their policies & ideology. Look it up. @DailyMailUK@MailOnline you're disgusting. Anything to push your agenda. Next you'll be telling me tomorrow is Weds. #Linekergate#Lineker
@LadeBackk I'm a Brit, and over here it's a given that Trump's a crook. It's so blatant. He doesn't even try to cover it up. When our Prime Minister tried it, he got ousted by his party because voters & polls didn't buy it.
Why's it good nothing happens? Law-breakers should be punished.
@LadeBackk Illegalities:
- Taking secret records with him after office
- Jan 6
- Wire fraud for misusing $250m of donations
- Pressuring Raffensperger to 'find' Georgia votes
- Trump Org misrepresenting finances for favourable loans
- Tax evasion, paying $750 in federal taxes in 2016
Etc
If any of you are under the impression that our billionaires might succeed in "escaping" to space, while the world burns, let me put those fears to rest with what I know from being the spouse of a NASA flight controller. 🧵
Johnson 'delivered' Brexit? Brexit has only been delivered in the sense that a flat-pack of furniture is delivered. It hasn’t been assembled yet because it won’t fit through the front door, several of the most important pieces are missing and the instructions are in Russian.
Johnson is the third PM to fall in six years because there is no solution to the deep economic and environmental crisis we face that picks our pockets and steals our future.
Real change isn't a new Tory PM but a new politics to redistribute wealth and power.
@ivor_victoria @FChecker76 @GlennThePlummer @steveturtle@JuliaHadfield5@ScientistBlood@JaneCaro@zdaniel How is there consensus on gravity? Observations test the theory. We see things stay on the ground. Same with AGW: observations confirm theory, like unusually high heat, warmer winters, heavier rain, less ice, oceans warming & acidifying, unusually freq wildfires. Simultaneously.
@FChecker76@redwondereroft1@kropija@ScottAdamsSays ...demonstrates >99% agreement in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the principal role of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities in driving modern climate change (i.e. since the Industrial Revolution).'
The *principal* role - not 'some' role.
@FChecker76@redwondereroft1@kropija@ScottAdamsSays Nope - you've cherry-picked it by mis-using it's context. Their metho states an implicit acceptance proves acceptance since AGW is so obvious at this point that these papers take it as a starting point for their research. Which isn't your claim. They also state: 'Our analysis...
@FChecker76@italianmaster@notlexluther11@irish191919@POTUS They also state: 'Our analysis demonstrates >99% agreement in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the principal role of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities in driving modern climate change (i.e. since the Industrial Revolution).'
@FChecker76@italianmaster @climatekw @notlexluther11@irish191919@POTUS Someone lied about Lynas paper. They say: 'Our finding is that the broadly-defined scientific consensus likely far exceeds 99% regarding the role of anthropogenic GHG emissions in modern climate change, and may even be as high as 99.9%'.
@FChecker76@PDAction Someone lied about Lynas paper. They say: 'Our finding is that the broadly-defined scientific consensus likely far exceeds 99% regarding the role of anthropogenic GHG emissions in modern climate change, and may even be as high as 99.9%'. Good try cherry-picking the graph tho
@FChecker76@astroecology Someone lied about Lynas paper. They say: 'Our finding is that the broadly-defined scientific consensus likely far exceeds 99% regarding the role of anthropogenic GHG emissions in modern climate change, and may even be as high as 99.9%'. Good try cherry-picking the graph tho