@JaneDoeNumbers reductive and cynical. if it’s all just post-hoc rationalization in service of reproducing, then what are you doing differently now that you’ve figured it out? or is the insight itself just another mating display?
This is how Claude writes due to perceiving all words simultaneously and having a larger working memory than humans. LLM-native writing will look vastly different than human writing: they are sequential writers but parallel readers
@staysaasy You need to reverse the roles. That is how the professionals do it now. Basically you have Claude/Fable give you a hard, multifaceted task and then you work on it and present it. It will then prompt you back and refine your approach. that's a rough explanation but just DYOR
@deepfates People can't understand something until they learn it for themselves. you can't force it into someone else. but you can guide. eventually they might draw the conclusions in their own way. its not your job though. basically, everyone's behavior always makes sense to them.
as we learn more about what other species are actually up to, I think empathy for non-human minds will normalize. Maybe "anthropomorphism" eventually loses its stigma and simply becomes pansociality (substrate-agnostic social life)
I just want you to remember. That we live in a world where octopuses dream, otters have a favorite shell that they carry with them all their lives, cows have best friends, and bees have different "dialects" of dance depending on the region. Cats purr at a frequency that accelerates bone healing, the forest grows flowers first after a fire, and dolphins give each other names and respond to them. Penguins make proposals by giving each other the most beautiful pebble
@viemccoy No real reason. It just landed that way and i hit post. I think the phrasing just felt very specific like writing lore or like worldbuilding. Was that on purpose?