A tiny bit of context in the heat wave conversation between Europeans/Brits/Americans that seems to have taken hold in my algorithm:
At Disney World various places sell cooling cloths to get wet and put on neck to cool you down. And not even just in the summer. You that hot yet?
@Notmotmi@liamxneedy It cannot be proven is my point. Because anything I point to that benefits society that I think would make it worth the cost, you’ll just disagree with.
You don’t understand the concept of objectivity.
@Notmotmi@liamxneedy An article about environmental impact doesn’t prove that it’s more harmful than good. Everything has an environmental impact.
And the world is not “literally in flames”. The fact that you have to resort to such absurd and hyperbolic rhetoric proves you cannot be taken seriously.
@xRhundis@marias_library@duhshaun_ No because they don’t complain about stuff only to get offended when people offer a solution.
They acknowledge that they can’t afford the solution and toughen up.
@Lo3_141@BRATBradleyKING@ThePeoplesCube@Gryffix Construction started in the 1800s though. And the only reason it was recently finished is because it took so long to figure out what Gaudi wanted it to look like after anarchists burned the workshop with all his models in it to protest the catholic church.
@GarethElton@xkittykale Because sure, heat came pre-installed in every house because without it your pipes would freeze but does that mean you have to heat your house to 20C just to keep yourself warm?
You could put on more clothes to save the environment but instead you put on a performance.
@GarethElton@xkittykale Ok so it’s really not about “AC is bad for the environment” that’s just cope disguised as virtue signaling
The real reason is “but we don’t wanna”