Mark Levett

[Count Dankula @CountDankulaTV]

When I got arrested for Nazi Pug, I got held in jail until my court date due to the "serious nature" of my "offence".

But the guy who threw a toddler into a crocodile enclosure to try and have him ripped limb from limb has already been bailed the very next day.

Clown country.

[S A M M Y Woodhouse @officialsammyuk]

This morning, I appeared on Good Morning Britain in a live interview about the grooming gangs. Before I went on air, I was told not to mention the race of the perpetrators. I, of course, didn’t listen.

I have now received an apology from the editor.

My interview is below: 👇🏻

[Andy @PositivFuturist]

Just to be clear.. The UK is choosing to forgo the AI revolution so that it can instead solve 1% of global emissions via economic degrowth and the adoption of intermittent renewable energy sources with no means of buffering or storage.

[Anthony Pompliano 🌪 @APompliano]

SpaceX hit $3 trillion market cap today.

This means Elon Musk made more money in the last 24 hours than Warren Buffett made in his entire lifetime.

Insane.

[Social Democratic Party @SDPhq]

Britain can fix its energy supply within four years.
Energy Abundance proposes 40 gigawatts of new gas and 20 gigawatts of new coal, fast, reliable power that works whatever the weather. Siemens built the equivalent for Egypt in under three years. We know it can be done.

Once those stations are running, the rationing charges on your bill get scrapped entirely, prices come down, the lights come on and Britain gets back to work. 🇬🇧

[Social Democratic Party @SDPhq]

If energy prices had stayed at 2005 levels, the average worker would earn significantly more today.
Output per hour worked would be 39% higher. That is the pay rise that never came, that is the growth that never appeared.
Expensive energy doesn't just hit your bill, it kills investment, closes factories, and holds wages down. The cost of the energy crisis shows up in every part of your life.

[Social Democratic Party @SDPhq]

Here is something nobody in Westminster will say out loud.

Your bill is high on purpose.

Wind and solar can't reliably power the country.

Rather than fix that, the government made energy expensive so you'd use less of it.

Keep demand down to match the unreliable supply.

77% of the increase in your energy bill since 2004 has nothing to do with the cost of fuel.

It is charges designed to manage a broken system,

[Al Carns @AlistairCarns]

This week the most advanced AI model on the planet got switched off by a foreign government. British researchers were studying it. British companies were testing it. British hospitals were piloting it. Not any more.

This isn't an AI story. It's the story of every industry we used to lead.

Britain has some of the best AI talent in the world. DeepMind was built here. Our AI Safety Institute writes the rules other countries follow. We have the researchers, the universities, the standards.

What we don't have is the power stations to run the data centres, the planning system to build them, or the industrial base to make the chips. So the work happens here and the value lands somewhere else. We invent. Others build. Others decide. Then we read about it on Saturday morning.

Same story as the kit our soldiers don't have. Same story as the factories we used to.

I spent nine months in government making this argument inside the room. I'll make it louder from outside.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The BBC Has Ruled. Brexit Damaged The Economy. No Further Debate Required.

The BBC's editorial complaints unit has decided that the negative economic impact of Brexit is now a settled fact. Not a contested judgement. Not one side of a live debate. A fact, in the same category as man-made climate change, requiring no balancing view.

The ruling followed a Radio 4 Today programme segment featuring Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, alongside Liam Byrne and Sir John Gieve, both long-standing advocates of closer EU alignment. All three agreed Brexit had damaged growth. The presenter, Katya Adler, did not challenge the premise or introduce a dissenting voice. A complaint followed.

The ECU's response is the revealing part. It acknowledged the segment failed to "acknowledge the alternative case" for pursuing opportunities outside the EU rather than realignment with it. That part of the complaint was upheld. But the central complaint, that three pro-EU voices agreeing with each other on air is not balance, was dismissed. The reasoning given was that this reflected "the consensus among economists" and there was no "significant body of economic opinion" on the other side.

This is worth pausing on. The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist. The institution that is legally required to be impartial has ruled itself the arbiter of which questions are still open and which are closed, and Brexit has just been moved into the closed file.

The economics itself does not support the certainty on display. The headline figure driving much of this narrative, an 8 per cent hit to GDP since 2016, comes from an NBER paper built on a "synthetic control" model that constructs a hypothetical non-Brexit Britain from a basket of comparator countries. The largest weighting in that basket, over 60 per cent, is the United States, a country currently riding an AI investment boom and a separate fiscal stimulus. The model also weights Estonia and Greece more heavily than France or Germany. On a straightforward per capita basis against France and Germany, the actual comparators, Britain's performance since 2016 sits roughly in line with both. An 8 per cent gap simply isn't visible. This is a model producing a number that then gets reported as "the consensus," which the BBC then cites as the reason no alternative view is required.

That loop, model produces number, number becomes consensus, consensus becomes fact, fact requires no balance, is the mechanism. It does not require a conspiracy. It requires an institution that has decided which conclusions are respectable and which are not, and which then treats its own prior decision as evidence.

The same posture has been on display all week. A government department can decide its diversity targets are lawful without seeking legal advice to check. A police force can decide a book about dismantling "inner white supremacy" is leadership training. A broadcaster can decide an economic question is closed and that deciding so does not breach its own impartiality rules. In each case, the institution marks its own homework, and the mark is always a pass.

None of this requires Brexit to have been a triumph. Britain's economy has genuine problems, most of them unrelated to single market membership. But a state broadcaster, funded by compulsory licence fee under threat of prosecution, has now formally placed one of the most consequential political decisions in modern British history beyond the reach of its own impartiality obligations. Reform's Lee Anderson called it being "blinkered by groupthink." The more precise description is an institution that has stopped being able to tell the difference between its own assumptions and the facts.

"The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist."

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Every single person who still cringes at the memory of trying to bullshit their way through an interview or exam question: today, the slate is wiped clean. Set down your burden of shame. Nothing - nothing, I say - could touch this.

[Jack Montgomery @JackBMontgomery]

A man loses an eye to a deranged migrant knifeman, allowed to claim asylum despite passing through two safe EU countries, and the family puts out a statement saying it's worth it because the "hospitality sector" needs mass migration? I find this almost literally unbelievable.

[Nick Dixon @NickDixon]

You must be gutted it’s too late to prosecute them.

[Jonathan Wong @WONGthink]

3-5 years for a throwing a traffic cone is wild when Hamid Safi, a Rochdale child rape gang member, only received 4 years.

This is how disposable white lives are to them.

[Laurence Fox @LozzaFox]

Never EVER plead guilty.

Exercise your right to a jury trial.

Whilst you still can.

It’s the BLM retards at @HantsPolice who should be in the dock.

Perhaps they’ll get another visit very soon.

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

@zarahussain999 There will be no apology, because I mean what I said.

[Steve Perkins @Perky_43]

Around 4 or 5 years ago the Met came up with a scheme whereby new recruits (who were of a black or minority ethnic background) would be afforded guidance and on-tap assistance throughout their 2 year probation.

There would be a tutor assigned throughout that period to guide them through challenges, issues or concerns. Issues that many or all probationers come access throughout their probation at some stage.

Sadly, if you were white you were on your own and wasn't afforded that extra assistance or guidance.

I was working at Edmonton police station in North London and I challenged this on an internal platform.

Within a few hours I received a personal email from a Chief Inspector and Superintendent, both of whom suggested I refrain from any negative views on this project.

The Superintendent (who still serves today but now in another force) made veiled threats that if I didn't remove the communication or change my view that matters 'could go further'.

Many people today wonder why things aren't challenged in the job, particularly around race related issues.

The problem remains that if you dare to challenge these things, you are either bullied into submission or punished.

Thankfully, I was in my final few months of the job & really didn't care anymore. If I was staying, I would have had to toe the party line and remain silent.

Many officers hate these schemes, but are too afraid to speak out & instead just accept that things are the way they are.

Race plans aren't only external projects within the job, they very much control things internally too.

[Connor Tomlinson @Con_Tomlinson]

Sure, here's some sources:

Sikhs vote overwhelmingly for left wing parties in Britain. The same is true in the US and Canada.

Even as support has fallen for Labour since 2023, it has increased among Greens and Lib Dems.

Sikh support has been conditional on a Sikh Manifesto pledge. In 2024, it included pledges to criminalise “anti-Sikh hate in a similar fashion to Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia”.

It was supported by the Sikh Federation UK — the same one that has released the statements condemning the Nowak family, that people have been praising.

The simultaneous Hindu manifesto, signed by Conservative politicians in 2024, contained commitments to criminalise "microaggressions" as “anti-Hindu hate (Hinduphobia)”, to make it easier for "Religious Workers" and the dependents and elderly parents of Hindus already in the UK to immigrate here, and more funding for Indian language and Hindu schools.

So, the parties have to cater to foreign religions, minority lobbies, and promise liberal immigration policies to win Sikh and Hindu support.

While it may not be the case for your friends, or Hardeep Singh, it is the case that many Sikhs and Hindus in Britain they prioritise whatever advantages their ethnic group over what benefits the British people.

I don't support that. Those who behave that way should leave. And I am happy to ban all immigration from India going forward.

[Dominic Cummings @Dominic2306]

In Jan 2025 Starmer said @elonmusk's loud criticism of the Grooming Gangs coverup was a 'far right conspiracy theory'. Many SW1 NPCs like Lewis Whats Article 50 Goodall said it was his 'finest moment'.
But the 'conspiracy theory' was true and @elonmusk was right.
And he's right about the two-tier policing that Tories and Labour created deliberately. This is in black and white documents and HR departments and legal advice docs across the country.
Both parties were proud of it.
What's happened is the usual NPC vibe shift + Narrative Whiplash always = some glitches in the matrix.
Like -
Closing borders is bad >> Not closing borders is far right
Masks don't work >> Not wearing mask is far right
Vaccines impossible for covid >> opposing vaccines is far right
Grooming Gangs is a far right conspiracy theory >> We're starting an official Inquiry on Grooming Gangs
Putin blew up the pipeline, claims it was someone else are far right conspiracy theory >> Ukraine blew up the pipeline, Slava Ukraine!
etc etc

[Make Europe Great Again - M.E.G.A @ScaryEurope]

Labour MP LEFT IN TEARS As Rupert Lowe Asks HARD HITTING Islam Question!

[Burnside @BurnsideWasTosh]

You've worked hard, you get a 10% pay rise from £100k to £110k. You get an extra £3.8k and the State gets £7.7k.

Inflation is 3%. So you end up with an extra £800, which just about covers the increase in your council tax.

Why bother.