That's a rather rookie way of looking at it.
Cultures exist, western culture stemmed from Greek philosophy, Roman law, and Christian values. From that grew a variety of cultures across Europe, and later into the Americas.
I'm an atheist married to an Asian, from my experiences I've found most 1st or 2nd generation Asians came here fleeing war, pursuit of the gold rush, or quite frankly, were drawn to our western values and wanted to study here. They essentially wanted to leave communist nations where they were told to conform, they looked to us as being individuals and free, something some of them found appealing.
The flip side of that is the attraction of their cultures...hard working, strong family values, pride in education which I very much love about them. Together we have made a beautiful Australian culture which consists of many different races. We are in the Asia Pacific after all
But some cultures, some people do not see us as a culture to integrate with, but to subjugate. They don't appreciate our way of life, in how we want to live, some cultures are incompatible with our own.
When you bring in large numbers of people from different cultures in a short period of time...they directly bring along with them their own culture, with little regard to our own, essentially killing what made us great in the first place. This is something we need to protect.
Diversity is NOT our strength, sharing common values and goals are.
That, and most of us in the west have caught on to the UNs vision of the great replacement, knowing that the irradiation of our culture makes it easier for us to be ruled and governed. It's by design.
I agree with you but to put an idea out there, it would possibly benefit the relationship if the woman would just proxy all finance, investment, forecasting, retirement decisions to the man.
Might be seen as controversial, and it would be a problem if she got married to a man child, but he really should have the most reasonable understanding to fulfil that need and take the burden from the woman. If she trusts and respects the husband it shouldn't be a problem.
@BretWeinstein Jordan Peterson had a spiel on this. You're a lier and a dishonest person, and worse yet you're doing it to gain social score , you're willing to be deceitful to gain public favor.
You choose evil for the wrong reasons.
@ellymelly Absolutely. I read something the other day about there being less teenage pregnancies than ever and that it was seen as a win, for a moment.
You quickly understand why there are less teenage pregnancies and you start to realize there's a bigger problem with the youth.
Those of us bitterly opposed to communism fall into two different groups.
A) Those who argue that it must be abandoned because it has show us that it doesn’t work.
B) Those of us that are so bitterly opposed to collectivism applied to dissenting individuals that we are relieved that it *cannot* work. A happy accident. Those who don’t care if it *could* be made to work: we’d continue to fight it. Working or not working is irrelevant. It’s just bad. Period. The end.
If Communism could actually be shown to deliver stable high levels of growth and innovation, broadly distributed, with low inequality,
I believe I would still fight it to my dying breath.
My opposition to communism has little to nothing to do with the fact that it doesn’t work as an economic system. So, it’s merely a relief that it doesn’t work. A convenience for its opposition.
Communism and collectivism are intrinsically soul killing for people who are hyper-individualistic . So let’s stop hiding behind the fact that they don’t work as economic or governance systems.
Some of us who aren’t the biggest fans of naked capitalism red of tooth and claw, hate communism not because we think capitalism is intrinsically fair. It isn’t. We oppose it because communism hunts the individual.
For us, It’s not communism vs capitalism. That is a businessman’s argument. Instead, it’s communism vs individualism for me. Show me a system that fights harder to let a dissenting individual thrive more than brutal market capitalism (which also barely works), and I am all ears.
Not everything is a market after all.
The elephant in the room. Where does culture come from? The people.
They will call Replacement Migration just a "far-right conspiracy theory", but we are watching it play out before our very eyes.
@4mambo Gaslighting prick.
Everyone is sick of all the globalist lies, no one is buying it, and years from now those of you who attempted to rewrite humanity's history will be called out and forever become accountable.
@BeautifulOz@Bender_Aus@AusLobby ...who do you think has brought them all here throughout the west?
The biggest con Isr4el have pulled off, is convincing people the outcome of their actions are the problem instead of the actions themselves.
@Chickensalt1234@shallowchal The juice are the ones bringing them here.
More and more people are learning about what's been going on. It's Isr4el that are pushing for the great replacement and collapse of the west.
@DHughesy From Labor Authoritarian to Libertarian...it's great seeing so many people wake up to the government corruption and bloat, and the control they have on our lives.
Proud of you @DHughesy you're not the only one and won't be the last. Thank you for using your influence for good.
@Sangleki@jordanhknight_ My wife is from there as is my sister in-law.
The message is, "multiculturalism" doesn't really exist there, as there are so many guard rails in place to preserve the "Singaporean" culture
That's not multiculturalism. Multi is a myth.