Laplace

bla bla Male bla bla bla 23

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

https://t.co/02exqDYxX2

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

Feliz cumpleaños a mii 🥳🥳

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

@pburkitt56 Me too!!

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

@YunayuriiYuna Hot!

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

@sstahlhelm Una pena que mi groomer haya sido un maricón sin dinero

[Yuzinha🦔 @yuzinhaaa]

filósofa aos 8
inteligência emocional aos 13
responsabilidade máxima aos 17
mãe solteira aos 18

[Merlt3rd @merlt3rd]

ポッキーの日

[野村香純(闇) @nomura_kasumi]

早くセックスロボット導入して女をオワコンにしてほしい

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

https://t.co/ykcHyhVmwe

[Davey Jones (Pyrrha’s Husband) @DavidJonesNFL]

Good night

[takusaku @takusaku4967]

#BlueArchive #ブルーアーカイブ
ブルアカミユバニー

[OTOME💪 @TomeofTomeKoko]

The way a good number of women romanticise the idea of meeting a complete stranger and marrying them within 3–6 months in the name of “men know what they want” will never sit well with me.

Not to be that person, but it’s strange. And the even crazier part is how much agency you’re willing to surrender in this whole narrative. Any random stranger can walk into your life, decide he wants to marry you within six months, and you interpret that as some grand validation of your worth. “He saw my worth, that’s why he married me so quickly.”

As opposed to questioning how strange it is that you’re willing to let someone you barely know make a lifelong commitment with you. Why is his willingness to marry you so quickly the ultimate measure of your worth? Where does your own judgment, discernment and decision-making come into all of this? Do you even like the person beyond the excitement of being chosen? So many questions, very few answers, but yeah…..it is what it is.

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

@Alejandrogytyf @honeyblinku @LaSalitadelSin Basado

[Raaya @RaayaIsLost]

last thing you see before leaking all the state secrets

[˚ ༘♡ ⋆｡˚ 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓮 🦢🎀🎹 @posieswann]

hot take: If a man’s going to marry a slut, he should at least get to marry three.

but if he’s lucky enough to marry a virgin, she has earned monogamy.

i don’t understand why men are expected to offer the same exclusivity regardless of what a woman brings to the marriage.

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

@mishdaigo Deberian ejecutarlos, hacen quedar mal al sexo masculino.

[em @svrusly]

presumir q un turro te dio bola es como creer q una stripper te ama

[STRCH @STRCHiii]

Karl Marx had a obsessive yandere baddie at the age of 17 #need

[Laplace @StoneColdVocel]

Gracias a Dios soy bisexual, no entiendo como alguien podría enamorarse de una mujer.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"

And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.

It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.

Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.

In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.

So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?

This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.

If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.

And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.

This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.

This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.

Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.

The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.

And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.

Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.

In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."

In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".

Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.

We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.

What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.

Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"

And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.

It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.

Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.

In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.

So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?

This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.

If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.

And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.

This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.

This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.

Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.

The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.

And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.

Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.

In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."

In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".

Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.

We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.

What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.

Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.