Prop 1 is NOT what it seems.
It's a deceptive abortion law cleverly written to hide what it actually does: Prop 1 legalizes abortion on demand up to 8 months into pregnancy, allows abortions on girls without their parents’ knowledge or consent, and lets “healthcare providers” who are not doctors perform abortions.
Watch this short video to find out more…
https://t.co/sPmJuwW1qL
Does it surprise you to learn that the Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act has some big out-of-state money behind it? What if I told you that this kind of thing is typical on both sides of the aisle? What's the real issue here? Let me know what you think of all of this. 👇🏻
Graphics and information sourced from Idaho Sunshine and Stop Prop 1.
“When New York billionaires and Washington political committees are writing six-figure checks to change Idaho’s abortion laws, that’s not a grassroots movement — that’s an attempt to buy an outcome our own communities never asked for.” Dee Sarton added, “This is what it looks like when outside interests try to import California and New York policy into our state. The Idaho I know will see right through this.”
CLICK THE LINK to review the donors and sign up to help defeat Prop 1: https://t.co/jBkLQikbSR
Prop 1 tells you it allows abortion until "fetal viability."
Then it redefines viability.
Buried in the fine print, Prop 1 would allow abortion on demand as late as the seventh or eighth month of pregnancy. And it grants that right to "every person," with no age limit written anywhere in the text, so a minor could get an abortion without her parents knowing.
Prop 1 is too extreme for Idaho. Vote NO.
For decades, Idaho has said a baby is "viable" once it can survive outside the womb with medical help, like NICU support. Proposition 1 rewrites that definition entirely, saying a baby isn't viable until it can survive without this type of help. That doesn't happen until the 7th or 8th month of pregnancy.
Hidden behind deceptive language, Prop 1 is really late-term abortion, for any reason, well beyond the point when the baby can feel pain…
Learn the truth at https://t.co/jfbVeVX6bt.
Reacting to a video from @stopprop1_ID about the potential hidden dangers of this item on your Nov ballot. What do you think, does this initiative represent Idaho values? Are you for or against?
Proposition 1's definition of "healthcare provider" is too broad. It would allow staff at abortion clinics — who aren't doctors — to perform abortions, with no accountability if something goes wrong.
Watch to learn what's really in the fine print.
What does Prop 1 actually do?
Dee Sarton put that question to three Idahoans who look at it from three different angles. Dr. Megan Linders on the risk to patients. Attorney Lili Pirc on what the text would do to Idaho law. Sen. Camille Blaylock on how far this sits outside anything Idaho has considered.
None of them started in the same place. All of them landed on the same word: extreme.
Watch, then share with an Idahoan who hasn't made up their mind.
https://t.co/repJR7a6Dv
In Idaho, a child needs a parent's consent for an aspirin. Under Proposition 1, she wouldn't need it for an abortion, and the person performing it might not even be a doctor…
Learn more at https://t.co/VrCa3Wm3xZ.
A parent has to sign off before a school nurse can give their child an aspirin. Proposition 1 would let that same child get an abortion with no parent involved at all.
Watch to see just how far Prop 1 goes…
Prop 1 claims it only allows abortion up to fetal viability. But it redefines "viability," allowing abortion for any reason into the seventh or eighth month of pregnancy. That's more extreme than Roe v. Wade.
Learn the truth at https://t.co/rJKQ7A0Zpe.