Please RT this until Burnham's Labour Govt:
1. Stops insulting people's intelligence.
2. Stops all Govt support for the Zionist GENOCIDE.
3. Stops arresting & sentencing good people (who are trying to save lives) - as terrorists.
Thank you very much.
Please RT this until Burnham's Labour Govt are no longer actively supporting the Zionist GENOCIDE & arresting & sentencing thousands of it's own good people - (who are trying to save lives) -as terrorists.
Thank you very much.
1. Corbyn got 0.5M more votes in 2019 than Starmer got in 2024
2. The party was not 'found to be institutionally antisemitic'
3. He didn't 'rip antisemitism out of [his] party'
Quite a feat; three brazen, objective falsehoods in a single paragraph.
His legacy.
#ItWasAScam
Dear Alastair @campbellclaret , I sent you this request two weeks ago. You haven't replied. I know the level of detailed sourcing and research that went into my book. Could you attempt to substantiate yr remarks, or pls now withdraw them, Kind Regards Peter
It truly beggars belief Burnham’s policy is being ‘drawn up’ by the former head of Labour Together, a faction so toxic and right wing, it effectively destroyed Starmer’s government.
That Starmer (pettily) called Corbyn's Labour "immoral" in his speech is astounding. From the man who led a party that backed a genocide, proscribed a direct action group, arrested pensioners, demonised immigrants, cut disability benefits and more. What planet do they live on?
We live in an upside down world where the guy who facilitated a genocide, demonised disabled on benefits, & made a racist Island of strangers speech, calls the guy who opposed all of that, “morally bankrupt” , and the media agree with him
Bills up.
Wages too low.
Record profits for Oil & Gas.
50 richest families with more wealth than 50% of population.
Shit in our rivers.
Pensioners jailed for protesting.
Migrants thrown under the bus.
Supporting a Genocide.
That's Starmer's legacy.
The fact that your government has made it illegal for me to answer yes is a damning testament to your flagrant disregard for civil liberties.
This may be targeted at those taking action against the genocide, but it sets a very dangerous precedent that puts everyone at risk.
Wes Streeting blocked for me raising concerns about Gaza in his replies.
Don’t let these people re-write their own history of complicity.
@archivegenocide
You were part of a cabinet that armed and supported a genocidal apartheid Israeli state.
Spare us the crocodile tears.
No amount of revisionism erases your role in that. You’re complicit, whether you like it or not.
Literally none of the Polanski ‘scandals’ concern me in the slightest. An MP who has embellished his CV a tad or done a weird embarrassing job in the past just sounds like literally all my mates.
Meanwhile none of my mates have had houses bought for them by expat billionaires.
On behalf of their client, Zara Sultana, Bindmans Media and Information Law Practise Group requires that I publish the following statement on X, and that such statement must be clearly visible and pinned to my
profile for a continuous period of no less than 24 hours:
“On 30 March 2026, I published a post on my X account addressed to Zarah Sultana in which I stated that she encourages and incites violence and is friends with terrorists.
Those statements are false. I was wrong and offer my sincere apologies to Ms Sultana for the harm and distress caused to her.”
It is my very great pleasure to do this, and I reiterate my sincere and repeated offer to meet with Miss Zara Sultana in person to resolve our differences.
I will point out that none of the other major Political Party Leaders have ever had to live on a house boat.
Because they are all multimillionaires and each has received hundreds of thousands or millions of pounds in 'donations'.
I have complained about this to the BBC:
Dear BBC Complaints Team,
I am writing to complain about a segment on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) broadcast on 10 May 2026.
During the interview with Richard Tice (@TiceRichard) of Reform UK, Mr Tice stated that the Green Party is “the anti-Semitic Green party.”
This was a serious accusation.
My concerns:
-No right of reply
No Green Party representative was present to respond. The presenter did not mention that the Green Party had not been given an opportunity to reply.
-Failure to challenge
Laura Kuenssberg did not question, challenge, or provide any context/counterpoint to the claim. She simply moved on.
-Breach of due impartiality
BBC Editorial Guidelines require serious allegations in political contexts to be properly tested and for due weight to be given to opposing views. This did not occur.
The Green Party is led by Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski), who is Jewish. No context was provided to viewers.
I believe this fell short of the BBC’s standards on fairness and impartiality.
Please investigate and consider a clarification/correction.
Thank you. James
#BBCLauraK
This deserves to be circulated.
A former Red Cross staff member got in touch.
She testifies about @ZackPolanski's role.
For transparency: her name is Brea Thibodeau.
The whole thing is a desperate smear.
How does @SkyNews think that it is in anyway shape or form okay for @TrevorPTweets to deny Zack’s Jewish identity, and when he challenges him on it to dismiss him so rudely.
It’s antisemitism and Trevor Phillips should apologise to @ZackPolanski immediately.