Wannabe Defense Atty

Resisting indoctrination, not a lawyer, nothing is legal advice.
Christian, Ohioan, libertarian 1st, conservative 2nd.
Century Dictionary Fan-boy Account
日本語

[Wannabe Defense Atty @StrictLiable]

It is contrary to Anglo-American moral tradition. You do not have a right to take your life. The natural right to life is the only truly inalienable natural right. It was gifted to you. "The bestower of a gift has a right to regulate its disposal."

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

No matter what happens don't you dare commit suicide. Your family will never get over it.

[Curt Mills @CurtMills]

“It is not entirely clear why Mr. Colby, who is in charge of Pentagon policy, would be a target. But he is one of the most prominent proponents inside the U.S. government of a restrained foreign policy” https://t.co/4ZmdV7iPvp

[Tom Woods @ThomasEWoods]

@bonchieredstate The Israeli Lobby richly deserves this. If you're pretending to be on the right and somehow still don't see that, that's truly mystifying

[Wannabe Defense Atty @StrictLiable]

@tbeatty3729 @JD_Cashless Yeah, that is a bastardization of the state with the state flag. I hate that mixing of symbols.

[Wannabe Defense Atty @StrictLiable]

@tbeatty3729 @JD_Cashless What an ugly patch, but that explains it. Sheriff's are rare where I live, city and state highway are daily though.

[Judge Glock @judgeglock]

Wait Graham Platner got a 100% disability rating from the VA? Why isn’t that the biggest scandal of the whole campaign?

In another era a clearly healthy young man running around with the same rating as a paralyzed veteran would be an outrage even if he wasn’t running for Senate

[R.C. Maxwell 🇺🇸 @RCMaxw3ll]

If you have a masters in the tech field and can’t find a job it’s because of H1-B visas.

[Curt Mills @CurtMills]

“The aggressiveness of the Israeli intelligence collection on top U.S. officials during the second Trump administration has been ‘unhinged,’ one senior official said” https://t.co/4ZmdV7iPvp

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

Perhaps the most wild business paper you’ll ever read.

“Examination of the option trading leading up to September 11 reveals that there was an unusually high level of put buying. This finding is consistent with informed investors having traded options in advance of the attacks.”

“The maximum value of this measure for AMR or UAL during the target period is at the 0.99 quantile of its daily distribution and the 0.96 quantile of the distribution of its greatest daily values over four trade date windows.”

TLDR: The level of put buying on American and United Airlines in the days before 9/11 was greater than roughly 99% of all comparable trading days in the historical record.

[Russian Garbage Human @RusGarbageHuman]

>Be Vickrum Digwas neighbours
>3 years ago
>Hear gunfire
>Take a video of Digwa shooting
>Report it to the police
>Police say they can't do anything
>Since reports from other residents
>Therefore this report isn't real

The warning signs were there.
Yet prevent only visit White patriots.

[Project for Immigration Reform @PFIRorg]

This analysis is laughably misleading.

The Department of Labor’s position is that current H-1B prevailing wage floors are artificially set **too low**, which means employers can often hire H-1B workers below what similarly qualified American workers earn in the same occupation, experience level, and geographic market.

Pointing out that H-1B salaries are slightly above today’s artificially low floor is irrelevant and frankly, intellectually dishonest. The relevant question is whether H-1Bs are being paid what comparable American workers actually earn. Multiple studies argue that they’re not.

And raising the wage floor doesn’t “exclude skilled workers”. It requires employers to pay wages that reflect the market rate for middle- and upper-skilled labor, which is what the program was intended to do. If an H-1B worker is truly indispensable, employers will pay the higher wage. If not, they can hire locally or pay more competitively.

But as we’ve pointed out, this new wage rule isn’t likely to accomplish much. Employers can still engage in SOC-code arbitrage by selecting job classifications that produce the lowest prevailing wage, rely on private wage surveys to generate favorable wage determinations, and take advantage of the fact that the USDOL generally does not verify prevailing wage claims during the Labor Condition Application process.

By law, the Department of Labor’s review of LCAs is largely limited to checking for completeness and obvious errors, and applications generally must be processed within seven days. As a result, many of the underlying wage representations receive little scrutiny at that stage.

Cato’s “analysts” know all of this. Yet they’re paid to make a fuss over every little effort that attempts to expose the cheap-labor scam, largely to justify their existence, because they have few career prospects outside of doing exactly that.

[Modern Age @ModAgeJournal]

“Neil Gorsuch has made a splash lately doing rounds of interviews to promote his new children’s book on the Declaration of Independence. But his view of history leaves little room for nuance or complexity.”

@nmosvick: https://t.co/9jJPiw5upT

[Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry @pegobry_en]

@wil_da_beast630 We’re well aware.

And while it’s possible to imagine an America where we have to start killing each other over political differences, surely we don’t have to start with the other side’s infants.

[Leading Report @LeadingReport]

Up to 90% of India’s H1B visa applications contain fraudulent information or involve unqualified applicants, a former official tells Newsweek.

[Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy]

So she did a bunch of sex drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll stuff, lied about it, got married to a foreign government agent, had an affair with Destiny, and came to the conclusion that the problem is traditional Christian morality and marriage. Lol.

[Morse Research @Morse_Research]

NEW TOOL: Find out which refugee/UAC resettlement NGOs are operating near you.

Introducing the Refugee Resettlement organization locator.

3,700+ taxpayer funded organizations mapped, updated with new recipients automatically

https://t.co/zUTW7O6ZTj

[Wannabe Defense Atty @StrictLiable]

@RWApodcast Because modern presidents always want to fix it, but they fail to and demonstrate a key problem in America. None of the modern presidents were reasonable enough to simply call men to clean it. They insist on following regulations, morality in hiring, conducting studies, etc.

[Oilfield Rando @Oilfield_Rando]

Men shouldn’t bail on the children they father and refuse to support them.

Men shouldn’t fuck their brother’s widow and introduce her to crack.

Men should get a real job instead of trying to grift the political world with a fake PR-firm-manufactured Everyman facade.

[Wannabe Defense Atty @StrictLiable]

The standard should be extremely harsh for armed robbery. However, rarely mitigation needs to be considered. Armed robbers committing the act under circumstances that most man can appreciate, even if they disagree with, exist. These rare cases are never armed teen robbers tho.

[memetic_sisyphus @memeticsisyphus]

There is a a case to be more lenient on certain types of murders or assaults than on premeditated armed robberies. It’s plausible a relatively normal and potentially productive member of society goes too far in a heat of passion. A bad bar fight, a cheating spouse, a drug filled stupor, etc… a one time slip up caused by overwhelming emotions. Not great, but I understand how an otherwise normal person could do something like that, and circumstance permitted allow for some leniency.

Armed robbery has too many opportunities for reflection to be sympathetic. You have to have the idea, find the weapon, get some friends together, make a plan, find a victim then threaten the victims life with a gun. It’s not born from a moment of madness. It’s a calculated devaluation of your fellow man, a selfishness that values a few dollars over someone else’s life.

[Wannabe Defense Atty @StrictLiable]

These exact circumstances are why I decided to purchase and read multiple books from judges and defense attorneys long dead. I have heard and seen far too much cross examinations that make me think, there is no way that was strategically wise.

[Shipwreckedcrew @shipwreckedcrew]

Defense Counsel Cross --
Q: "Mr. Witness -- is it your testimony that my client committed a crime in your presence?
A: "Yes".
Q: Did I hear you correctly to say that you witnessed my client do that?
A: "Yes".
Q: And you knew it was my client because you worked with him for 5 years?
A: "Yes"
Q: "And you have no doubt that you had a clear, unobstructed view of what happened?"
A: "Yes"

No more questions your Honor."

Not too much of an exaggeration.