Free speech has NEVER included the expectation of freedom from all consequences.
It simply means you are entitled to decide FOR YOURSELF whether the expected consequences are worth it to you.
Repeat: Consequences are NECESSARY to keep your speech FREE.
EXCEPT WHAT IS WRITTEN AND BROADCAST IN THE FAKE NEWS, I NOW HAVE THE HIGHEST POLL NUMBERS I’VE EVER HAD, SOME IN THE 60’S AND EVEN 70’S. THANK YOU. MAKE AMERICA GAVIN AGAIN!!! — GCN
I think this will be my final tweet. After all, it’s now perfectly legal for the *PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED FUCKING STATES* to have all his political opponents KILLED as long as he motions “official business” with his hands and our laws are now POWERLESS to stop it?! Fuck off 💀
Everybody say it with me now, ALL HAIL KING JOSEPH BIDEN, FIRST OF HIS NAME, PROTECTOR OF AMERICAN WASTELANDS NEW AND OLD, AND SOLE ARBITER OF DIVINE JUSTICE IN THIS, OUR NEW PARADISE!!!
Hats off to FUCKING GENIUS #scotus for making NOT A WORD of that to be unacceptable 💀💀💀
Everybody say it with me now, ALL HAIL KING JOSEPH BIDEN, FIRST OF HIS NAME, PROTECTOR OF AMERICAN WASTELANDS NEW AND OLD, AND SOLE ARBITER OF DIVINE JUSTICE IN THIS, OUR NEW PARADISE!!!
Hats off to FUCKING GENIUS #scotus for making NOT A WORD of that to be unacceptable 💀💀💀
I *really* don’t like the way this is phrased. It’s not directly stated but at least implied there are 4 earnings categories. Really disappointing that Forbes is ok w/this kind of weaselly statistics bullshit
Can anyone help me understand this? The author is suggesting this is evidence women are paid unfairly v. men, but doesn’t this support exactly the opposite conclusion?
If men are disproportionately represented among all but the highest category, and only a BARE majority of the highest category, doesn’t that imply a disproportionate amount of all women are IN the highest category?
@ZaleskiLuke@elonmusk It is still so surreal that Elon Musk decided to become so unhinged that he now makes Mark Zuckerberg look like a hero for free speech