Stuart

[Tristin Hopper @TristinHopper]

Everybody else, meanwhile, simply hasn't learned how bad it's gotten. But it's a rare Canadian who can keep their temper in check once they're acquainted with the true state of our asylum system, and a justice system that rewards and incentivizes migrant crime.

[John Carter @martianwyrdlord]

Seeing a lot of people expressing skepticism over the 250,000 number. My impression is that no one has the foggiest clue what the actual count is, since the government has carefully avoided documentating the ethnic backgrounds of perpetrators, so the best anyone can do right now is extrapolate from what limited data are available.

Some insist that those extrapolations establish 250k as the bare minimum, and suggest the true number could be up to a million. Others are skeptical of the methodology and think it's more like 25,000.

I have no idea myself. But I will make a couple observations.

First, I haven't seen anyone on the skeptic side make an attempt at a better extrapolation. Maybe someone has, if so feel free to share in the replies.

Second, though, I'm getting strong Boudicca of Dundee vibes from the methodological skeptics. Very similar feeling to the people insisting that Sophie was a violent little criminal slag. Turns out no, the terrified 12 year old girl was brandishing weapons in an attempt to defend herself from a Bulgarian Muslim gypsy who'd just assaulted her sister, against a background of gypsy rape gangs preying on local girls. That isn't evidence for 250k of course. I'm just saying, it really feels like the same kind of people doing the same kind of thing.

[Wiretap Media @WiretapMediaCa]

The Canadian government doesn’t track crime stats based on immigration status so they convinced the public that immigration reduces crime based on a fraudulent study conducted by McGill University that used foreign data to justify the invasion—now data shows a direct correlation between immigration, and the sharp rise in the types of systemic crimes from the same third world shitholes plaguing our country.

Canadians better wake the fuck up.

[MR. OBVIOUS @ObviousRises]

This judge sent a veteran who served in Iraq/Afghanistan to jail for two years over Facebook posts he made in the wake of child murders.

She also let rapist, Rees Newman who SA'd a 13 yo girl go free citing "overcrowded prisons."

Her name is Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke, Cardiff.

[Endeavour @RoyalEndeavour]

Canada has an explicitly two-tiered justice system. It's now legal precedent that Indigenous or black criminals are given reduced sentences on account of their race.

Here's the most recent example of a heinous offender getting preferential treatment for not being white.

[Stuart @stuartca87]

@JasminLaine_ Canadian journalists are distilled evil

[Jasmin Laine @JasminLaine_]

Canada… are you okay?

A journalist just asked an MP—with a straight face—what he’d say to mentally ill people who were hoping the government would kill them next year.

Let that sink in.

[New York Post @nypost]

Schizophrenic woman who fatally stabbed newlywed in Toronto drug store is shockingly released:' No longer poses threat' https://t.co/JnCiGjaz3j

[Stuart @stuartca87]

@piersmorgan And all it took was the dignity and mental health of a couple of hundred thousand working class girls!

[Canada Spends @canada_spends]

In Canada:

The senior poverty rate is 5.4%
The child poverty rate is 11.5%

There are 8.1M seniors in Canada
There are 7.6M children in Canada

Seniors vote more than the rest of the population
It is illegal for children to vote.

[Élie Cantin-Nantel @elie_mcn]

BREAKING: All five floor crossers, Chris d'Entremont, Michael Ma, Matt Jeneroux, Lori Idlout, and Marilyn Gladu, voted AGAINST killing Bill C-9 and voted to approve the Senate amendments, sending the bill to Royal Assent.

A shameful disgrace.

[Dan Williams @DanWilliamsAB]

When you use our national symbols to pursue the political flavour of the month, you debase our national identity and tear at the fabric of our nation.

Who is surprised that after decades of this nonsense Canadian unity is at an all time low?

[Stuart @stuartca87]

@HoCChamber Don Cherry was right

[Peter Boghossian @peterboghossian]

Which is worse, raping someone or using political power to either allow or ignore the rape of 250,000 children?

[i/o @avidseries]

Maybe this is my American bias intruding, but my guess is that if the US had faced what several European nations have faced with respect to Muslim immigrants — parallel societies, crime rates 10 to 50 times greater than native rates, full-time employment rates below 50%, majorities leeching one way or another off welfare and social services, church burnings, street beheadings, craven obsequiousness by governments in the face of Muslim cultural aggression, laws prosecuting and imprisoning citizens for speaking up about immigration, mass organized gang raping of white girls, no-go zones, selective government recognition of Sharia law, bombings, constant unending propaganda about the value of global south immigration and the evils of speaking up against it, preferences in favor of immigrants in public housing, government suppression of anti-immigrant political groups and parties (and of its own data about immigrants), riots, Muslim politicians from some of the most racist countries on earth lecturing white people in legislatures about "Islamophobia", exponential growth in the population share of Muslims, immigrant descendants demonstrating higher criminality and more anti-West hatred than their parents, majority percentages of Muslim immigrants expressing support for Sharia law — if we, as Americans, had faced what the citizens of many European nations have faced, it would not have taken long before our rage, if unacknowledged and not effectively addressed by our government, would have likely led to the formation of organized groups committed to violent retribution against those responsible for the mess.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

The victim testimony of Chloe from the rape gang inquiry is horrific

- Abducted by a Muslim abuser
- Raped her at 12 years old in a graveyard
- Raped her with a whiskey bottle which broke off in her vagina
- NHS removed the pieces but asked NO questions
- Plied with drugs and drink
- Told police she was having sex with adults but was dismissed as a child prostitute
- Passed between men daily for years
- Police found her with abusers but released men after no investigation
- Chlamydia in throat/vagina, gonorrhea, warts, PID at age 13, clinic said NOTHING
- A social worker suggested she audition for a TV role as a grooming victim instead of helping.

As she got older:
- Gang invaded her home, orally raped her on her sofa in front of others.
- Raped with objects (cans, keys, baseball bat)
- Forced to house and witness abuse of other children.
- Spiked with heroin, leading to addiction and anorexia (weighed 5 stone/~70 lbs at 18).
- Coerced into Islamic conversion and "marriage" to an illegal migrant abuser who beat her daily
- gave birth to a child with health issues from her damaged body.

This all happened in Britain
In our country
To our girls

[Eric Lombardi (EricForOLP.ca) 🇨🇦🚀 @EricDLombardi]

I’ve been following the debate around Bill C-22, Bill C-34, and Bill C-36.

Together, they touch on lawful access to digital information, online safety for children, the social media ban for kids under 16, AI chatbots, privacy, and consumer data rights.

Parents (and most people) are right to be concerned about the harm smartphones and social media are doing to children.

But I worry we are moving too quickly toward the wrong architecture and using this as cover.

The bills here give the government significant new powers over digital life before we have properly debated what freedoms we should have.

I would rather consider something as blunt as prohibiting physical smartphones for children under 16, while allowing simple phones for calls and texts, than rush into legislation with such massive implications.

A physical smartphone ban for minors can be debated, tested, changed, or reversed. A surveillance architecture is much harder to unwind once it exists.

I am also concerned by how much of the real substance will be decided after Parliament votes.

We should not be giving unelected regulators broad discretion over privacy, speech, encryption, digital identity, private conversation, and what counts as harmful content.

Those choices should be made by legislature following real debate. This matters even more as AI becomes more powerful and governments begin using it.

It may be used tomorrow in ways we do not yet understand.

Before we redesign digital rights, Canadians deserve a much deeper debate:

1. Do citizens own their personal data?

2. Should they be compensated when others profit from it?

3. Do they have a right to strong encryption?

4. Do they have a right to conversations that remain truly private?

5. What protections should exist when AI systems can increasingly analyze, predict, and influence human behaviour?

6. Do we have the right to erasure? Or to opt out entirely?

7. How much burden should be placed on technology businesses to comply?

I don’t like many of the answers these bills offer. Hence, a simpler solution. Protect children directly, let them have simple phones for now.

Then take the time to get the rest right.

Our federal government is doing Canadians a disservice by rushing legislation this consequential without having serious public debate.

[Dean Allison @DeanAllisonMP]

Tobi, since a few Conservative MPs betrayed their constituents & joined the Liberals earlier this year, the Liberals have a majority.

Essentially they can initiate and pass any legislation they want.

The only thing that can stop them is public pressure.

But people barely even hear about these Bills because legacy media is covering for Carney / Liberals non-stop by scaring people with “orange man bad” never ending rhetoric.

[Build Canada @build_canada]

You've likely seen the headlines from bills C-34, C-36, and C-22 in the media.

Each may sound reasonable on their own: protect kids online, modernize privacy, help police catch criminals.

But buried within is an emerging Digital Regulatory Superpower unlike anything Canadians have ever seen.

These bills hand one unelected commission power over what Canadians can say, what stays private, and who the state can watch.

As of today, the Federal Government is rushing to enact massive Internet Surveillance Reform into law without proper debate.

[Firas Modad @firasmodad]

Two tier policing. They're thinking about this in terms of how it affects communal relations with the Sikhs. Not in terms of evidence of a crime being committed, which is obvious and overwhelming.