@bruning_ron Your point was that Cohen has the means and willingness to disregard cost in team building. A sustainable team implies limits to resources. There was a better option on the market than the internal options and the Mets didn’t take it. Thus they didn’t optimise for 2024
@bruning_ron Prospects mostly matter because they have the potential to give you production which exceeds their low cost. If cost doesn’t matter you go with the better player who has a proven track record.
@bruning_ron@MetsInTheUK@RobMcKay86 That’s logically flawed. If you have unlimited resources you would have a better player even as just a back up. If you genuinely don’t care about cost you just go out and sign Chapman and let Baty/Vientos back up
@bruning_ron@MetsInTheUK@RobMcKay86 What ifs don’t matter. Look at what they did do and they didn’t add significant payroll this year. A team with unlimited resources is not going in to opening day with Joey Wendle on the roster!
@bruning_ron@MetsInTheUK@RobMcKay86 There are long term and short term needs. Yamamoto could be signed to compete next year but since he didn’t that money didn’t go on the roster to compete this year. 2024 was not a target, in part because there is 50m plus expended on players that are not helping the team!
@bruning_ron@MetsInTheUK@RobMcKay86 Which would be an indication they weren’t trying this year. If the dead money wasn’t an issue they could easily have spent more. This is a team that wouldn’t have had a DH if JD’s price didn’t drop!
@bruning_ron@MetsInTheUK@RobMcKay86 It’s clear that there is head room for long term strategic deals like Yamamoto but you only need to look at who was in the rotation this year to see that those big FA deals were not repeated. Nobody got a big contract out of the Mets this year
@bruning_ron@MetsInTheUK@RobMcKay86 There has always been at least a soft cap to payroll despite that so if you end up with a $100m black hole it’s going to limit the roster to some degree
@RobMcKay86@MetsInTheUK It’s also a fair point about Alonso. Boras is going to be after a big contract but the bat speed looks to be going so you might end up getting him for a shorter deal but lots of teams would take him on those terms too so if the Mets don’t commit early it may end up being moot
@RobMcKay86@MetsInTheUK Yeah don’t know if Vientos is going to cut it at first but he is below average 3rd and Alonso is not the best defender either so I think there is scope to at least try it. If you can pick up a DH that can cover 1st you can hedge against that and let Vientos fill in at DH
@RobMcKay86@MetsInTheUK The issue with Alonso is if it needs a long term deal. That’s going to go bad pretty quickly and if you can get a decent 3B with better defence that Vientos you can swap Vientos to first and maybe not lose much (so long as you add another power bat from somewhere *cough* Soto…)
@MetsInTheUK It really depends on what it takes to get Alonso back. Manaea is definitely worth a contract and you could make a case for Stanek. Winker is fine but you can pick up guys like that every year and I’d want a better every day DH option
@entschwindet It’s definitely not as coherent as the Dundasvale scheme that got horribly ‘upgraded’ a few years back but that just shows that this stuff won’t be treated with any sort of respect if it doesn’t have some protection
@MurphyNiallGLA No I think it’s fair and a sensible retention of the ABC *should* push you towards more sensible massing. It’s dispiriting though that I can barely recall a single development proposal in the city that wasn’t at least a storey or two larger than it ought to be