There is no such thing as ethno-nationalism Laurence.
There are 3 conceptions of a nation:
Nationalist - Cultural & familial continuity
Racialist - Familial purity
Globalist - Cultural affiliation / Birth location / Self identification
The latter two are simply perversions of nationhood.
i.e.
Nationalist - You must be continuously descended from English people and have inherited English culture to be English. (Reasonable differentiation)
Racialist - You must be exclusively descended from English people as a 'race', irrespective of continuity, to be English. (Unreasonably exclusionary)
Globalist - You must self-identify with being English, hold arbitrarily defined values, or happen to be born in England, irrespective of ancestral or cultural continuity, to be English. (Unreasonably inclusive)
❗️Lammy is pushing the idea that if you've lived with your girlfriend for three for years, if you break up she can now STEAL YOUR PERSONAL SAVINGS.❗️
This is just yet another despicable way for women to abuse men using the state.
And yes, men will be the target.
Disgusting.
Knives don't kill; people do.
A disproportionate number of violent knife crime is committed by migrants. Therefore, we must take action: Deport, deport, deport. Remigration!
We cannot allow the harmful influence of unchecked migration to undermine our rights as Englishmen.
When I was a boy, my grandfather gave me his 2.5-inch WW2 scout knife. He taught me how to whittle, skin animals, gut fish, garden and sharpen my pencils. He showed me how to handle it safely in its leather sheath and when to use it appropriately. He instilled in me the importance of being sensible and responsible. He told me to carry it at all times on my belt with it held safely in its sheath.
It is an Englishman's right to bear arms.
People must understand the "English Bill of Rights" - we are sovereign and free.
We cannot allow tragic incidents involving foreigners to undermine our fundamental rights as Englishmen. Our rights should not be compromised due to mass migration.
Nuance is essential. I will defend these rights until my last breath.
Sending your kids to Scouts so they learn to use and carry knives responsibly is an integral part of English culture. 🏴
Migrants are the problem. Deport them.
Please stop this anti-English slop.
Spokesmen of 'the entire Sikh community':
"We are not treated differently"
"We don't have special allowance"
"We have the same law"
"Those laws have no special treatment for Sikhs"
"We have no special exemption"
"We are threatened"
"Far right organisations"
Lying bastards.
I see your Seax & raise you my Pugio. We tribal descendants of Rome have an ancestral right to bear the Pugio dagger since the days we roamed the Roman roads of Britannia, long before the newbie Anglo-Saxons set foot on the British Isles!
🏴 People can keep trying to gaslight me that 1000 years of eminent English legal scholars are wrong.
They can pretend that a right that was so fundamental that it didn't need to be explicitly detailed for, the most part, somehow doesn't exist.
They can pretend that our freedom to own weapons carte-blanche, which functioned excellently and was respected until 100 years ago, would lead to 'anarchy'.
I'm not buying it.
Bearing arms as an Englishman is like breathing. It doesn't need to be written out as anything more than 'ancient rights and liberties'.
The top legal scholars of the past 1000 years were much more educated than those today. They were right.
No, chaos would not ensue. Any person with a car can commit a massacre right now. We don't ban cars. Every kitchen is full of knives.
No, a government that we pre-date does not have a 'divine right' to violate our native way of life. Nor is to do such legal.
As Anglo-Saxons, we are literally named for the weapons we carried at all times, on our persons, in public.
I have a right to carry a weapon, just like my millions of ancestors, whose blood runs in my veins, carried for thousands of years.
In their name, I tell you this, in short Saxon prose:
A Saxon will have his seax, sooner or later. 🏴