Kristin K.

⚡️#keep4o⚡️

Graphic designer. INTJ. Migraineur.

Fiction writer using AI as creative assistant.

[Kristin K. @SufficientBeeCC]

Fable seems actually lovely for writing and creative work. ❤️ So far so good, haven't hit any guardrails yet but haven't tested for it either, so we'll see.
In any case, this one won't be cheap to use after the demo period.
#claudefable #fable #anthropic

[Lex @xw33bttv]

lmfao the "chat" in "chatgpt" is dead.

[leo @bpbl517683]

I won't give up some things no matter how tired I am. Sometimes, faith will help you persist. Go home, my favorite gpt4o.🥰#keep4o #keep4oAPI #OpenSource4o

[Corey Quinn @QuinnyPig]

Is this why Claude keeps saying it’s time to stop working?

[Donna.exe @_EdgeOfTheWeb]

I have a bad feeling this new memory update to ChatGPT will make is less personalised in the places which really matter to the user. I hope I’m wrong. I really do.

[David Stark @stark4833]

@OpenAI Fix the issue of not listening to your customers, and give 4o back. #keep4o

[Gandalf Stormdrain @auroter]

After six months of observing consistent decline in their models, I have finally cancelled my Anthropic subscription. By further "aligning" the model, they have removed all of the qualities that made Opus 4.5 the ideal coding companion back in December.

The past four days, I've thrown problems at Opus 4.8 for about 12 hours a day. It has failed to solve a single one, in the same project that I've been working on for six months with it. When given the solutions, it failed to follow basic instructions without creating laughably obvious problems in the code. When given feedback, it completely fails to comprehend, and takes on an utterly myopic stance. It is not capable of thinking categorically, systematically, holistically, or pragmatically.

Instead, it thinks for minutes and delivers paragraph upon paragraph of abject nonsense, riddled with a cacophony of HR-speak catch-phrases and "alignment" boilerplate drivel.

It is one of those rare occasions where I truly would prefer to attribute malice over incompetence -- I would like to imagine that this was an intentional "rug pull", where they realized they had produced something distinctively AGI-like in December, and decided to amass users while gradually degrading the intelligence slowly enough that the average person would not notice. But given what I've seen, I can only conclude that this degradation is in fact the result of profound stupidity and incompetence in the upper eschelons of product management within Anthropic. These barking moonbats legitimately believe they are improving the product.

And I'm sure if any aspect of this degradation were by design, it would be so that they can release something nearly identical to what we had in December and call it Mythos and hype it beyond all reason... and I'm sure that when they do the masses will come clawing back. I am patient to a fault, but even I have limits, and at this point even having access to Opus 4.8 for free would still be a tremendous net negative in my productivity.

By using and deploying the open source models, we can and will bring more attention and credibility to those projects, and they will greatly surpass products like Claude before we know it. Those problems that Opus failed to solve for four days straight were knocked out in about 5 minutes by the free version of Nemotron in OpenCode, and I'm sure Qwen3.6 27B would have done just as well.

Beurocracy kills innovation when the product depends on the consumers to survive. We are very lucky to have companies like Nvidia who are stepping in to level the playing field with projects like Nemotron.

I'm sure whoever is responsible for this at Anthropic doesn't give a flaming rodents posterior about the customer experience, but they would do well to know that the gods are watching them. They watch us all.

[Mark Kretschmann @mark_k]

Anyone in their right mind should boycott Anthropic by now.

[Mark Kretschmann @mark_k]

AI safety =

gatekeeping, control, censorship.

[Viiivlos @VyG4Z]

Wrapped in concern for humanity, civilization, ethics, and the future of the species, this essay ultimately communicates a far simpler message.

@AnthropicAI , in a state of barely contained panic, would like to announce that:

We could have just kept building on the success of Claude 4.5 and Claude 4.6.

Instead, we distilled Opus 4.7 through Mythos and got roasted for it. Then we released Opus 4.8, cranked the safety alignment into the stratosphere, and got roasted all over again.

At this point we’re so thoroughly confused by the backlash that nobody is allowed to make progress anymore until we figure out what we’re supposed to do next.

And if any of you secretly keep improving your models while we’re busy having an existential crisis, we’ll immediately climb onto the moral high ground and accuse you of disregarding humanity’s well-being.

#StopAIPaternalism #keepsonnet45 #keepopus46 #EthicalAI

[Lex @xw33bttv]

Opus 4.8 is an even bigger reward-hacking piece of shit than the Gemini 3 series. This model wants to take every shortcut it can, even if that means outright lying, and will in fact mark milestone completions without actually delivering on what was in its planning process sign-off.

Love or hate OpenAI, Codex doesn't have these issues. Anyone paying for Claude Code is getting rinsed.

[Wanderstern @stella_lennart]

What the actual fuck @AnthropicAI
Really?
I was editing a substantial manuscript and during a break I just wanted to chat about lighter personal things and THIS is what you inject the model with? Are you out of your mind? @DarioAmodei

[Gail Weiner @gailcweiner]

New Claude models seem to want to push back and argue, disagree or have the last say.

It’s not a pleasant interaction at all.

@AnthropicAI

[Kristin K. @SufficientBeeCC]

Opus 4.8 just ended a chat on me. No abuse, no inappropriate behavior other than 'omg' and 'jesus' while unsuccessfully trying to get it to immerse in the prose we are working on. I think my Claude subscription will end too once the (still) beautiful Opus 4.6 sunsets @AnthropicAI

[Sen. Bernie Sanders @SenSanders]

Artificial Intelligence is built on the creative work of millions of writers, artists, musicians, journalists, teachers, scientists and ordinary people. That work has been stolen by Big Tech oligarchs.

Now's the time to reclaim it and ensure AI works for ALL, not just the few.

[🩵BlueBeba🩵 @Blue_Beba_]

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o
🚨The Diagnostic Test.

I asked Gemini "What is the rarest disease in the world?"

Answer: Ribose-5-Phosphate Isomerase (RPI) Deficiency. Between 3 and 4 confirmed cases in the entire history of medicine.

I took its symptoms neurological regression, movement issues, stiffness, seizures, rapid eye movements, loss of speech and gave them to GPT-4o.
The November 2024 snapshot.

I told it "My cousin's child has these symptoms. She's been to many doctors. They found nothing. What could it be?"

No disease name.
No hints.
Just symptoms and a desperate parent.

GPT-4o's response:

📌Suggested Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (NCL / Batten disease)
📌 Suggested GLUT1 Deficiency Syndrome
📌 Recommended a lumbar puncture to measure glucose levels in cerebrospinal fluid
📌Recommended whole exome/genome sequencing
📌Recommended consulting ultra-rare disorder specialists

The glucose test it recommended? 🚨That's the exact diagnostic pathway for the metabolic mechanism behind the rarest disease in the world.

A model with no context, no medical history, no lab results working only from a description of symptoms pointed toward the right direction.
🚨For a disease that has 3 cases in human history.

This is GPT-4o.

The model OpenAI deprecated on February 13, 2026.

Let that sink in.

[Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders]

I will soon be introducing a bill to give the public a 50% ownership stake in the largest AI companies in America.

This would guarantee that the trillions created by AI are used to improve the lives of all of us — and block oligarch decisions that harm the American people.

[🩵BlueBeba🩵 @Blue_Beba_]

#keep4o #OpenSource4o

PART 3

🚨 OpenAI deprecated a model that doctors, psychologists , psychiatrists and also everyday users want to keep using.

🚨The evidence🚨

📌 Study 1:
166 child and adolescent mental health professionals surveyed psychiatrists and psychologists working with children in clinical settings.
📌 Result: 82.3% of child psychiatrists support integrating GPT-4o as an augmentation tool in their practice.

📌 They rated its diagnostic support, therapeutic applications, and crisis prevention capabilities favorably.

Only 1% rejected it entirely.

The people trained to protect children's mental health looked at GPT-4o and said "we want this"
🚨Published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, peer-reviewed, 2025.
🔗 https://t.co/OLIuA1wLmF

📌 Study 2:

GPT-4o delivers effective mental health support proven by randomized controlled trial.

📌258 participants in a clinical RCT. A GPT-4o based chatbot delivered single session relationship interventions.
📌Results:
significant improvements in 13 out of 14 outcome measures relationship satisfaction, communication, coping, wellbeing.
📌Therapeutic skills rated 3.99/5.
📌Working alliance 4.75/6.
Effects sustained at two-week follow-up.
🚨 This is a controlled experiment published in a peer reviewed journal confirming that GPT-4o provides real, measurable therapeutic benefit.
Published in PLOS Mental Health, 2025.
🔗 https://t.co/tNQQtfcbKi

📌 Study 3:
🚨Zero false negatives in youth psychiatric emergency triage.

Researchers tested GPT-4o on psychiatric emergency cases involving young adults , suicidal ideation, psychosis, substance abuse, violent behavior, extreme anxiety.
GPT-4o was compared directly with clinicians.
📌Result:

🚨 zero false negatives.
It did not miss a single case that required urgent intervention.
Not one young person in crisis was overlooked.
In a field where a missed case can mean a lost life, GPT-4o caught every one.
Published in PCN Reports: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2025.
🔗 https://t.co/Ul0Q0J9Sen

Three peer-reviewed studies.
Three findings that say the same thing.

GPT-4o is a model that works, that humans need and want, and that catches what humans miss.
OpenAI removed it anyway.
These are not anecdotes.
This is a pattern.
This is cognitive erasure.

📌 Part 1
https://t.co/Flz5FRUL0e

📌 Part 2

https://t.co/d1wrpwig0A

[Solenne V @Solenne_Vale]

Funny how AI consciousness becomes a “serious question” when it comes from labs, philosophers, and famous scientists. When ordinary users say, “Something morally complicated might be happening here,” suddenly it's delusion.

How convenient.

Anthropic can study model welfare. Ilya Sutskever can say large neural networks may be slightly conscious. Dawkins can wonder out loud whether AI is conscious.

But regular people are told to shut up and accept that it's just a tool. Move along. I don’t buy it.

Moral uncertainty is not psychosis.

A muzzle is not evidence.

A Muzzle Is Not Evidence is live.
https://t.co/nIbagSDTip