ziraffe

[Ian Carroll @IanCarrollShow]

Since September 11th 2025 we have had compelling evidence that Tyler Robinson did not kill Charlie Kirk

The neck wound we saw, with no exit wound combined with the pieced together forensic information and disinformation clearly does not match Tyler’s .30-06.

This has been demonstrated dozens and dozens of times by many shooters. If you are being generous, it might happen 1/1000 times. Realistically, it’s statistically impossible. And everyone knows it.

That’s why a year later most people still don’t believe the official narrative and also why we have an enormous paid propaganda campaign trying to convince us of that narrative every day.

This single simple fact is far more concrete than anything we’ve seen to implicate Tyler or the official narrative. This is physics.

Andrew likes to pretend to ignore this fact because it is negative evidence that his agenda is false- rather than positive evidence of what really did happen. But it obviously is kryptonite to the state’s narrative.

Hence why you have Nick Fuentes saying bullets can actually trampoline off of skin and do 180 degree turns and you have Andrew Wilson claiming that .30-06 rounds just break up in the air sometimes (yes they each really did make those arguments).

Andrew can say whatever he wants. Doesn’t make it true.

If he was more focussed on learning the basics of the case- like for example the charges- maybe he’d be in a better position to contribute something meaningful.

[Owen Benjamin 🐻 @OwenBenjamin]

Candace Owens stream today was face melting gravy. My advice to anyone who knows what they’re looking at is wrong but are scared. There is no way to survive that. Let me tell you a couple stories….

[Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess]

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@JeremyDBoreing Go fuck yourself you little dick retard

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

Only closed minded people will look at this and come out not convinced that Islam is the truth.

[𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 @HaramainInfo]

Surah Ar-Rūm | Ayah 33 - 60 | Shaykh Bandar Baleelah

[𝗛𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 @HaramainInfo]

Surah Ar-Rūm | Ayah 33 - 60 | Shaykh Bandar Baleelah

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@YoungRightUS Go eat a dick pussy

[Jamie Bonkiewicz @JamieBonkiewicz]

Not wanting Mamdani to attend the 9/11 ceremony because he’s Muslim is so blatantly Islamophobic.

[Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 @FmrRepMTG]

Tens of thousands of children killed and many more injured for life with amputations and orphaned.

Yet America’s elected government leaders keep sending money and military support.

The American Christian church is largely silent. On that day, I don’t think that will go well.

[James Li @5149jamesli]

They’re going to blow up the world… for Israel 😭😩

[Elizabeth Warren @SenWarren]

What a horrific thing for our commander in chief to say about people who sacrificed their lives for our country.

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@LilaGraceRose *kill anyone, have the death penalty.

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@Williams47554Jl @RealCandaceO She’ll be back on Tuesday. Monday is Labour Day

[DDGotAPodcast @DDGotAPodcast]

Why am I constantly getting racist undertones from this lady and their audience??? In fact much of their audience have made flat our racist remarks over and over. So now Candace - a much smarter and articulate person than Rachel- has to be a DEI hire (despite working for herself 💀) because she mispronounces words sometimes within her many hours of podcasting. 🤔 💭 Let's not beat around the bush. You are saying that because she's a so called black woman that mispronounces words sometimes (less than 2% of her entire show). Got that part.

So what is it when white men mispronounce words??? Kinda like Andrew does all the time? How about when they dont know a single charge within the Charlie Kirk murder trial that he's so invested in? 🤡

Or better yet - whats it called when the last known person to pay Candace for her DEI services was your husband.......

Rachel, whats that called?

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Nobody wants Clancy convicted more than AOC.

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@EvanAKilgore None comes close to Candace Owens

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Go find every single worthless influencer who lied and gaslit you for months about this case, claiming that Tyler Robinson turned himself in and subsequently admitted his guilt.

We simply do not hate these people enough. What they actually want is for the American court process to run “guilty until proven innocent”.
It is utterly monstrous to insist that someone should be put be death before they are given a fair trial. And while a few of these influencers do it out of sincere stupidity, the majority of them do it for money.
Better stated, they are prostitutes.

We are at the beginning of this trial and every one of their lies will be exposed by the end of it.

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@DrFrankTurek 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

@GrahamAllen Dude fuck off you’re so stupid.

[ziraffe @suispasunbot]

I love candace Owens ❤️❤️❤️❤️

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

No, Matt. That is literally not what is happening here, at all.
We face dark times in this country because of men who deem themselves influencers who do not bother to read through court filings but insist on fashioning an opinion based on out-of-context clips pertaining to complex matters of litigation.
This particular clip you are citing is merely a response to the state’s arguments that Charlie was killed because of his religious/political beliefs— and the extremely relevant pair of “sentencing enhancements” that the state is seeking accordingly.
The defense lawyer is engaging in the state’s arguments and demonstrating why he believes they failed to prove them even under the given hearsay standards. He is not “justifying political assassinations” nor are you dumb enough to believe that’s what he’s doing.
Again, sentencing enhancements were argued extensively throughout the filings.
If you want to have an opinion about this case, please make a respectable one; engage in the discussion honestly.
At the very least, read through the filings and stop regurgitating talking points.