kimjones @suleikim8 - Twitter Profile

about 1 month ago

How to Create a Bogeyman in Kenyan Politics: The Manufactured Parallels Between Raila Odinga and Rigathi Gachagua Kenyan politics has a well-worn playbook for creating and sustaining a controlled bogeyman - a figure who appears as the face of opposition while ultimately serving the system’s interests. The current case study is Rigathi Gachagua, whose elevation mirrors the decades-long treatment of Raila Odinga. The first and most effective tactic is the strategic availability of “intel.” Both men have mastered the art of appearing to possess insider information about events that later unfold. They announce it publicly, the predicted event occurs, and the public is left in awe, whispering about their spies in government. For Raila, this built the myth of the man with eyes and ears everywhere. For Gachagua, it has birthed the “truthful man” moniker. The rise of this image is not accidental. It comes from carefully supplied scoops that turn out to be “true.” Take Gachagua’s demobilization of the June 25th Gen Z protests. He spoke authoritatively about goons being paid to kill, not because he had superior intelligence, but because he was part of the planning process and privy to how the police goons would operate that day. The information was not leaked to him - it was part of the script he helped write. The second, equally powerful tactic is the government’s deliberate response. Look at the usual loudmouths in the regime - Dennis Itumbi, Oscar Sudi, Kipchumba Murkomen, and others. They directly address Rigathi Gachagua on a regular basis, just as Uhuru Kenyatta once made almost every campaign speech and public appearance about Raila Odinga before the eventual 2018 handshake. This constant engagement is not accidental. It is a psychological operation designed to legitimize the controlled opposition. When Gachagua called for tourists and investors to shun Kenya, the government responded with outrage and rebuttals, making him appear as a significant threat and originator of bold ideas. In reality, young revolutionaries had done far more - including successfully calling on visiting heads of state to cancel trips, as seen with the Dutch royal visit. When that visitor eventually came, the reception was lukewarm at best, and commercial activists like Shakira Wafula who attended his forum faced massive backlash. By responding to Gachagua, the regime achieves two things: it keeps him relevant in the public eye and creates the illusion of a formidable opposition, while simultaneously marginalizing genuine voices and movements. The more senior officials attack him, the more he is elevated as the default alternative. This is how bogeymen are manufactured in Kenyan politics. Give them selective intelligence. Ensure the government engages them constantly. Control the narrative so that the public sees only the approved “opposition” figure while real alternatives are suppressed, arrested, or ignored. Raila Odinga played this role for decades. Rigathi Gachagua is the latest iteration. The system does not fear them - it needs them. They provide the theatrical resistance that keeps discontent channeled into safe, ineffective avenues. Kenyans must see through this theatre. The real opposition is not the one the regime constantly responds to and legitimizes. The real voices are the ones silenced, raided, or erased from the conversation. The bogeyman strategy is old, predictable, and increasingly obvious. The time has come to reject these manufactured binaries. True change will not come from the figures the system itself props up and engages. It will come from the people who refuse to play the scripted roles the regime has written for them. The bogeyman is not the solution. He is part of the problem.

FGaitho237's tweet photo. How to Create a Bogeyman in Kenyan Politics: The Manufactured Parallels Between Raila Odinga and Rigathi Gachagua

Kenyan politics has a well-worn playbook for creating and sustaining a controlled bogeyman - a figure who appears as the face of opposition while ultimately serving the system’s interests.

The current case study is Rigathi Gachagua, whose elevation mirrors the decades-long treatment of Raila Odinga.

The first and most effective tactic is the strategic availability of “intel.” Both men have mastered the art of appearing to possess insider information about events that later unfold. They announce it publicly, the predicted event occurs, and the public is left in awe, whispering about their spies in government.

For Raila, this built the myth of the man with eyes and ears everywhere. For Gachagua, it has birthed the “truthful man” moniker. The rise of this image is not accidental. It comes from carefully supplied scoops that turn out to be “true.”

Take Gachagua’s demobilization of the June 25th Gen Z protests. He spoke authoritatively about goons being paid to kill, not because he had superior intelligence, but because he was part of the planning process and privy to how the police goons would operate that day.

The information was not leaked to him - it was part of the script he helped write.

The second, equally powerful tactic is the government’s deliberate response. Look at the usual loudmouths in the regime - Dennis Itumbi, Oscar Sudi, Kipchumba Murkomen, and others. They directly address Rigathi Gachagua on a regular basis, just as Uhuru Kenyatta once made almost every campaign speech and public appearance about Raila Odinga before the eventual 2018 handshake.

This constant engagement is not accidental. It is a psychological operation designed to legitimize the controlled opposition.

When Gachagua called for tourists and investors to shun Kenya, the government responded with outrage and rebuttals, making him appear as a significant threat and originator of bold ideas.

In reality, young revolutionaries had done far more - including successfully calling on visiting heads of state to cancel trips, as seen with the Dutch royal visit. When that visitor eventually came, the reception was lukewarm at best, and commercial activists like Shakira Wafula who attended his forum faced massive backlash.

By responding to Gachagua, the regime achieves two things: it keeps him relevant in the public eye and creates the illusion of a formidable opposition, while simultaneously marginalizing genuine voices and movements.

The more senior officials attack him, the more he is elevated as the default alternative.

This is how bogeymen are manufactured in Kenyan politics. Give them selective intelligence. Ensure the government engages them constantly. Control the narrative so that the public sees only the approved “opposition” figure while real alternatives are suppressed, arrested, or ignored.

Raila Odinga played this role for decades. Rigathi Gachagua is the latest iteration. The system does not fear them - it needs them. They provide the theatrical resistance that keeps discontent channeled into safe, ineffective avenues.

Kenyans must see through this theatre. The real opposition is not the one the regime constantly responds to and legitimizes. The real voices are the ones silenced, raided, or erased from the conversation. The bogeyman strategy is old, predictable, and increasingly obvious.

The time has come to reject these manufactured binaries. True change will not come from the figures the system itself props up and engages. It will come from the people who refuse to play the scripted roles the regime has written for them.

The bogeyman is not the solution. He is part of the problem.

9

83

34

23

42K

suleikim8 retweeted

X

@Xouy17

30 days ago

I don't try to be nonchalant, I genuinely do not care about a lot of shit.

199

67K

16K

5K

2M

suleikim8 retweeted

Moe

@moneyacademyKE

about 1 month ago

Busia Senator Okiya Omtatah has tabled a motion seeking to compel the Treasury to give senators real-time IFMIS access for every county. Kenyan counties have already voided nearly Sh24 billion in approved payments this year alone

31

5K

1K

71

64K

suleikim8 retweeted