sully

[sully @sully48110412]

@XxX_skajfan_fan @eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch i said trumps name and now i guess that’s what this guys interested in

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch no quite simply my past experience is? i’ve SEEN a lot of these, and the person is regurgitating trump ideology.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch to me it’s a dumb trump supporter being as uneducated as most chronically online dumb trump supporters are. this is in no way a one off example of these kinds of braindead statements that they believe to be true.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch implication is not inherently subjective, its subjectivity comes when relating it to the topic being discussed. meaning that in the singular context of everyday normal language and conversation, implication is not subjective.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch expand on that what is a dual reality effect

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch some things in language are supposed to be perceived a certain way. otherwise language would be pointless and communication would be tedious.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch again i’ll say the big no no word for you. it doesn’t mean it, it implies it.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch stubborn to accept it but either way i’m just explaining to you why you look as dumb and insufferable as you do. good luck supporting your poverty club

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch that’s where you’re wrong, when you say a book IS written in english, it means the book you’re reading is in english, when you say a book WAS written in english you’re implying that it was originally written in english. that’s the context you’re not considering. ik you’re too -

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch so tell me what each of them means, not just past and present tense, what does that mean about the book

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch let me teach you something about your language. what does it mean if i say, the bible is written in english vs the bible was written in english? do those two mean the same thing?

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch i’m referencing the original post saying “if the bible was written in English” that this one is replying to. in that one, idk if you know what implication means since you’re just ignoring it, but it implies that it was originally written in english (for the 3rd time btw)

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch when you add that last bit of context in parentheses it actually does make sense, otherwise, you are simply wrong and need to go back to school because there is an implication that the book was originally written in english in the statement “the bible was written in english”

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch yes it does. that’s what the usage of written means when it comes to talking about books especially historic ones. i really hope you’re not a native english speaker while being this clueless.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch no what doesn’t what part of my reply are you addressing

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch the original post says “if the bible was written in english” which, if we put on our thinking hats, means the bible was originally written in english, which is incorrect, stop being a smartass you look dumb and insufferable.

[sully @sully48110412]

@eye_sand_ears @mindeathmoon @XxX_skajfan_fan @Kewlbeanse @grok @LehoustonFan @TerrellFinley7 @WiscoGuy1972 @_TheBlueTorch giga retard listen, writing and book writing are not the same thing. when someone says the book was written it means the original composition of the book. not the book being rewritten by any old random giga retard like yourself. use your fucking peanut spurs fan.

[sully @sully48110412]

@TariOnly @MahmoudWesam5 @MoSalah first of all you halfwit, saying he’s the pride of the arabs doesn’t have anything to do with religion. there are christian arabs, jewish arabs, even arabs with no religion, they’re still arabs. second, if you were criticized for every sin you committed, you’d be considered a pig

[sully @sully48110412]

@THATBOYMMAGURU the culture they come from is one where you are not ashamed of being weaker than your brother or knowing that he’s stronger than you. you are okay with your brother speaking to you in a condescending tone if he’s teaching you. there is much more security.

[sully @sully48110412]

@YungPhilos0pher @FacadeFoundry @PicturesFoIder right here officer