Just spent 3 hours hiking to that mountain lookout in New Zealand—and the icy alpine breeze + endless turquoise lakes below made every step worth it. No filters, just pure magic right here.
[Come join our Campus Volunteer Club this weekend! We'll clean up the lakeside park and hand out free water to passersby. Make friends and do good deeds together! ],
Our university photography club's outdoor photo walk is this Sat! Join us at 9 AM at the campus lake—chill vibes, tips from pro members, and perfect autumn shots waiting. Tag a friend who loves clicking pics!
Just tested the new immersive coffee lab at our neighborhood café—sipping single-origin brews while watching roasted beans dance right in front of me Total sensory upgrade! Drop your favorite café find below!,
Just tried to "copy" a colleague's coffee order and accidentally ordered 300ml of cat litter. Turned out office admin had mixed the order form labels… we now have a shared "kitty corner" on the breakroom table.
Genuine question -
Why is Kerala Blasters FC silent after Kerala delivered one of the best atmospheres for India national football team in years? 💙
These are YOUR fans too.
Or do they matter only in yellow?
#HelloSilence#SeenAndIgnored
We’ve always tried to be honest — even when it meant admitting we’ve gotten more wrong than right.
Which is why it’s disappointing to see statements taken out of context, especially when the purpose of the meeting was to build transparency, trust and unity between the club and its supporters — particularly the line: “If fans are ready to question the management, why did you not question Ivan Vukomanovic.”
Our relationship with Ivan has always been positive and respectful, and that will continue. Anyone suggesting otherwise should revisit his podcast with Manjapadda where our stance was made clear. We were among the first to understand his situation and stand by him — something he has acknowledged himself.
The claim that we asked fans to question Ivan is a misrepresentation. The discussion and specific question were about fight and character, and the counter-question raised was about why a walk-out was supported earlier — because that would arguably be the opposite of what fans are now questioning from the club. It was never directed at Ivan with ill intent.
None of this deflects from the current situation, which we all know is below the standards expected of the club. Everyone at the club is working hard to address it. But misrepresenting conversations — especially under the guise of seeking transparency and building trust — only creates further misunderstanding. Across both meetings with Manjapadda and FAB, we tried to be as open in our communication as possible. What we have never done is shy away from the club or from putting in the effort to move things forward.
I fully believe that whoever buys this club will show how to run it well and will change your blind assumptions and your narrow minded mentality. If so many people hate you and criticize you, why are you still holding on to this club? Sell it to someone else and leave.
2/3
We’ve always tried to be honest — even when it meant admitting we’ve gotten more wrong than right.
Which is why it’s disappointing to see statements taken out of context, especially when the purpose of the meeting was to build transparency, trust and unity between the club and its supporters — particularly the line: “If fans are ready to question the management, why did you not question Ivan Vukomanovic.”
Our relationship with Ivan has always been positive and respectful, and that will continue. Anyone suggesting otherwise should revisit his podcast with Manjapadda where our stance was made clear. We were among the first to understand his situation and stand by him — something he has acknowledged himself.
The claim that we asked fans to question Ivan is a misrepresentation. The discussion and specific question were about fight and character, and the counter-question raised was about why a walk-out was supported earlier — because that would arguably be the opposite of what fans are now questioning from the club. It was never directed at Ivan with ill intent.
None of this deflects from the current situation, which we all know is below the standards expected of the club. Everyone at the club is working hard to address it. But misrepresenting conversations — especially under the guise of seeking transparency and building trust — only creates further misunderstanding. Across both meetings with Manjapadda and FAB, we tried to be as open in our communication as possible. What we have never done is shy away from the club or from putting in the effort to move things forward.
How long will you keep making people fools? If business isn't your goal, if football is your goal, then please sell this club to someone else and take care of your business.
1/3
We’ve always tried to be honest — even when it meant admitting we’ve gotten more wrong than right.
Which is why it’s disappointing to see statements taken out of context, especially when the purpose of the meeting was to build transparency, trust and unity between the club and its supporters — particularly the line: “If fans are ready to question the management, why did you not question Ivan Vukomanovic.”
Our relationship with Ivan has always been positive and respectful, and that will continue. Anyone suggesting otherwise should revisit his podcast with Manjapadda where our stance was made clear. We were among the first to understand his situation and stand by him — something he has acknowledged himself.
The claim that we asked fans to question Ivan is a misrepresentation. The discussion and specific question were about fight and character, and the counter-question raised was about why a walk-out was supported earlier — because that would arguably be the opposite of what fans are now questioning from the club. It was never directed at Ivan with ill intent.
None of this deflects from the current situation, which we all know is below the standards expected of the club. Everyone at the club is working hard to address it. But misrepresenting conversations — especially under the guise of seeking transparency and building trust — only creates further misunderstanding. Across both meetings with Manjapadda and FAB, we tried to be as open in our communication as possible. What we have never done is shy away from the club or from putting in the effort to move things forward.
We’ve always tried to be honest — even when it meant admitting we’ve gotten more wrong than right.
Which is why it’s disappointing to see statements taken out of context, especially when the purpose of the meeting was to build transparency, trust and unity between the club and its supporters — particularly the line: “If fans are ready to question the management, why did you not question Ivan Vukomanovic.”
Our relationship with Ivan has always been positive and respectful, and that will continue. Anyone suggesting otherwise should revisit his podcast with Manjapadda where our stance was made clear. We were among the first to understand his situation and stand by him — something he has acknowledged himself.
The claim that we asked fans to question Ivan is a misrepresentation. The discussion and specific question were about fight and character, and the counter-question raised was about why a walk-out was supported earlier — because that would arguably be the opposite of what fans are now questioning from the club. It was never directed at Ivan with ill intent.
None of this deflects from the current situation, which we all know is below the standards expected of the club. Everyone at the club is working hard to address it. But misrepresenting conversations — especially under the guise of seeking transparency and building trust — only creates further misunderstanding. Across both meetings with Manjapadda and FAB, we tried to be as open in our communication as possible. What we have never done is shy away from the club or from putting in the effort to move things forward.