Believers who firmly hold BTC and deeply cultivate the pancake ecosystem BRC2.0 Exploration and Maintainer - Introducing EVM Smart Contracts and # DeFi into Bit
Why is @unisat_wallet supporting obvious low-float scams? At least 96.9% of the #bitdeer supply is controlled by the deployer, while 97.9% of #FB_ORDI is held in just three wallets (mostly in one), and in both cases, almost 100% of the supply sits outside #PizzaSwap. You do realize the con artists can cheaply sybil-attack the vote by simply spreading $50k of $FB across a couple thousand wallets, right? 😕
I understand that your team is heads-down building, so you have little time to investigate on-chain analytics, but our community flagged and documented this chicanery from day one (dating back to October 5th of 2025), and I can provide the screenshots to prove it. You've already made the mistake of adding 300,000 FB into the #bitdeer pool, so why not learn from this instead of doubling down and repeating the same folly? If you keep lining the pockets of charlatans, then the reputation of @fractal_bitcoin will never recover. I say this in love. I'm one of the few Western founders who has stood with you (the receipts are innumerable), but I can't in good conscience lend my support to the perpetuation of such glaringly brazen fraud, so I had to say something. I believe that your motives are good, or I wouldn't even bother with this appeal—it's not too late to turn the ship around. 🛳️
https://t.co/lbe8wJ7wnR
Hello @ofc_the_club Team,
Team : @_viN040 and @dnns_eth
I’m writing this on behalf of the community regarding the recently shared airdrop plan. While the initiative itself is appreciated, the current structure doesn’t feel fully aligned with a community first approach.
⚠️Core concern
Limiting rewards to only the top 25K users with 20% of the total supply leaves a large portion of active contributors unrecognized.
Suggested expansion
Increase the reward range to at least the top 100K users (or Minimum up to 75K). This will make the distribution more inclusive and better reflect overall community effort behind the project’s growth.
--
💡Reward reallocation
Top ranks are receiving disproportionately high allocations.
For example, my current rank is #1 with 100K tokens, which is more than necessary.
You can Cut my Share of Reward by 75% i am ok with it as i am at #1 Because of my Community
Similarly, adjusting rewards for other top ranks by around 50% (or more) would free up a significant portion of tokens. These can then be redistributed to include a larger number of users without increasing the overall allocation.
Community alignment 🤝
Top rankings are driven by community support. A wider distribution ensures fairness and strengthens trust across the ecosystem.
--
⏳ Vesting Improvement Suggestion
The current vesting model can be improved to make it more fair and user-friendly.
A better approach could be:
• 60% tokens unlocked at TGE
• 40% vested over 9 months
This gives users meaningful immediate value while still encouraging long-term holding.
⚠️ Also important:
• Claims should open at TGE, not 2 weeks later
• Delayed claiming feels unfair, especially for active early users
A smoother, more transparent process will build stronger trust in the community.
Expected impact
These changes would:
• Improve fairness and inclusivity
• Boost community sentiment
• Increase long-term engagement and retention
We strongly believe these adjustments will create a more community-first and sustainable distribution model.
Looking forward to your consideration.