Spring

Indie gdev. Former Rank 13 NA, Rank 1 Rengar/Reksai.

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@bonevoid Hes the twitch loll

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

couldnt play rengar support for doran but got the reksai in at least kekw

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@aidenyasuo oh wtf u were my yas ggs

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@wittiott theres also other ways to modify the reflect that I personally like the idea of but all the ones I like involve detatching the reflect from her shield and that just doesn't work w/ arcane canon ig

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@NoatakLoL i dont think thats enough of a change for her w warping play patterns as heavily as it does tho, the damage was never the issue its the reliability of the threat of countering any important ranged tool

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KyoseLeague @214verse frequency of changes indicating poor balancing is a valid complaint

saying a champion is weak so they shouldn't be changed isn't, i think the original tweet just gives the wrong impression

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@John_Bummit ai genuinely just needs regulation and that proper regulation would address any primary concern, issue is who tf is gonna regulate it 🥀

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@YukinaKris @DyLhun @_Pikahiiri_ @Yungwis53815781 thats why powerscaling different verses is just kinda stupid as some hypercompetitive online "debate" and should be done for fun bc it hinges on picking and choosing how to cross-apply rules

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@blameurnom24 main valid complains is homogenization of champ kits/identities

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@detentionlol wait i didn't ever hear of her original kit was she CLOSE RANGE?

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird and the response to vitrol might manifest as more positivity towards riot wherever possible

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird 3. You argue that the negativity is warranted bc the announcement was stupid
4. I argue that the announcement, while stupid for the community, is an UNDERSTANDEABLE decision to be made as a KNEEJERK initial response to a threat
5. You asked for clarification on concerns of

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird I clarify that the biggest issue facing players about the decision is the Per-player restriction, not the 3rd party tool restriction
8. We have a misunderstanding of what I was saying, and so I clarified, and here we are

Base point is still players are excessively vitrolic

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird Let me know where we've lost each other, ill write my general process through this convo.
1. You flame people who are trying to praise riot
2. I agree that praise is a bit much, but the positivity might be in response to the constant negativity present from players in general

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird as something completely indefensible either out of ignorance, bad faith, or both quite often.

Or do you hold the opinion that decisions like this from devs and their admin teams are something you cannot understand in any shape or form?

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird And i never went against that point - can I clarify what you think my point is?

My intended point is that player reactions in general + general player behaviour towards devs are just as unreasonable as riot's kneejerk security decision and they treat defensible reactions

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird https://t.co/ab6qspJ8Ny
"moving all remaining 3rd party applications onto the official API as the only allowed mechanism for retrieving game data"

Unless im severely misunderstanding, that's allowing specific 3rd party applications to retrieve game data, no?

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird and my point is #2 isn't as big of an issue bc its a finite enough number of creators that they can apply for verification easily

[Spring @sunaftersnow_]

@KatTheThird yes, thats why, if they're let through, theres no problem - thats the point of the verification system

For creators that make content on other players' replays by hand, that's to do with part #1

For creators that use their OWN bots or otherwise available tools, thats #2