@3JFnDnVIUG7793 @BrockRiddickIFB@CommunityNotes fact check what Allison Mack's actual confession was. The depiction in the main tweet is egregiously, demonstrably false. Here's her allocution: https://t.co/Htuo7aU8nY
Andrew Tate calling it a Matrix attack shields the attackers. In general, an abuse of power or act of deception is executed by specific individuals. Not a nameless, faceless entity.
Saying that AI will replace lawyers is like saying the invention of the hammer would replace carpenters. Tools don't replace artisans, they enhance their capabilities.
Fact-Checking Tip #001 for Lawyers using ChatGPT
Double-Check Case Laws: When ChatGPT provides case laws, always check them in your own legal database to verify their accuracy, relevance, and current status (they haven't been overturned or distinguished).
💡 Practical ChatGPT Prompt for Lawyers 💡
Legal Citation: "ChatGPT, can you help me correctly format these legal citations in Bluebook style?"
#ChatGPT#Prompt#Legal#AI#LegalAI#LegalTech
Fact-Checking Tip #009 for #Lawyers using #ChatGPT
When ChatGPT provides information about a jurisdiction's specific rules or laws, verify it against the official legal sources from that jurisdiction.
Prompt: ChatGPT, what is the statute of limitations for theft in California?
💡 Practical ChatGPT Prompt for Lawyers
Brief Writing: "ChatGPT, assist me in writing the introduction of a brief arguing for the dismissal of charges due to insufficient evidence."
#ChatGPT#Prompt#Legal#AI#LegalAI#LegalTech
Yesterday I caught up with a founder who is developing a custom database for the art world. It made me realize how valuable niche datasets are going to become in the new world of AI. I wonder how intellectual property laws are going to keep up.
When you make a change, whether it be implementing AI in your business, shifting your political affiliation, or standing for a cause, please be aware that the majority of folks will give you pushback to justify their inaction.