Hindi talaga ako delulu. I just observe—and my instincts never fail.
Let’s lay this down clearly: Bianca never had feelings for Dustin. Ever. Walang "past," walang “what if,” walang "sayang." So let’s not rewrite a story that never existed.
What’s real? Confusion. But not the kind na torn between two boys. It's the kind you get when the person you care about like 'Will' keeps sending mixed signals. The guy who confessed about “reconnection,” the same guy who keeps bringing up another guy in every conversation. Of course maguguluhan ka! Any woman would.
And despite the noise, Bianca remains emotionally aware. She knows her feelings weren't mutual with Will before. That was two years ago. What matters now is the now (hahaha naclear na nga yung past, ngayon naman siya naguguluhan). And right now, she’s not confused about Dustin. She’s confused about Will. Kasi kahit si Will, hindi alam minsan kung gusto niya magpakatotoo o magpakatorpe.
Exhibit A: That moment sa couch. Bianca was literally singing “Ako’y sa’yo at ika’y akin lamang” and tell me why—why—did she clear her throat sa “sa’yo at akin” part, while sneakily looking at Will. As in may eye contact pa. Will, kung hindi mo pa rin nakuha ‘yon, ipapa-frame ko na lang yung lyrics at ididikit ko sa noo mo. Manhid ka talaga ehh, sarap mong kurutin everyday!! 😤
And then that script moment—Will pointing at the paper Dustin gave her, pero Bianca didn’t even bother to say Dustin’s name. Nagbaby talk pa si ate mo habang ineexplain kung sino nagbigay pero hindi naman kayang sabihin kung sino. Guys. Come on. Come. On. There is so much unsaid between them, but the tension is there, the history is there, and the care is still very much there.
Bianca makes little moves—slow, cautious, pero consistent. Baby talk. Lingering glances. Soft smiles. But all of it is Will-centered. Even her closest friends? Always watching Will’s reaction, not Dustin’s. Because they know. And deep down, so does Bianca.
So please. Enough na with the love triangle na hindi naman totoo. This isn’t Bianca being indecisive. This is Bianca trying to confirm kung may pinanghahawakan pa ba siya with Will—because she never let go in the first place.
One clear act of love lang ni Will, I swear, iikot ulit mundo ni ackla. Taob talaga si Dustin.
A shining milestone for our one and only sunshine! ☀️
SUNOO’s cover of ‘Beautiful’ has now surpassed 2 MILLION VIEWS on YouTube! Let’s keep the love flowing and make this masterpiece shine even brighter 💛
Keep streaming, ENGENEs!
🎧 https://t.co/kqiUtP1yPB
DOUBLE MILLION FOR SUNOO
#2MyBeautifulSUNOO #엔하이픈_선우 #SUNOO
@ENHYPEN_members@ENHYPEN
THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE CASE OF MARIS RACAL AND ANTHONY JENNINGS
Even before screenshots of text or chat messages between Maris Racal and Anthony Jennings were leaked today, many people - especially those who were cheated on - have always asked me before about the legality of posting and sharing screenshots of private conversations.
I have always told them that there is such a thing called as the right to privacy. Even cheaters have human rights.
The National Privacy Commission (NPC) clarified in a 2020 advisory opinion that the Data Privacy Act applies to screenshots if they reveal the identities of those involved: “It is worthy to note that the processing, i.e. sending out the screenshot to another person, will only come under the scope of the DPA if personal data is indeed involved—if the conversation/screenshot itself allows for the identification of the parties. If it is simply the content of the conversation, with names and other identities redacted or cropped out of the screenshot, it might not be within the scope of the DPA.”
So even if you were the victim of cheating, by posting screenshots of any alleged affair, not only are you exposing yourself to cyberlibel charges but also to charges for violating data privacy - which is punishable by stiffer and harsher penalties than cyberlibel.
And while the Supreme Court just recently said that there is no violation of the right to privacy if screenshots are used in a criminal case, that is the caveat - the screenshots must be used in a criminal case.
So what’s a girl to do?
Well, you should still take screenshots as evidence of cheating or an affair (especially if you’re married).
Then, what you should do is instead of posting on social media is to file a VAW (violence against women) case - psychological violence caused by infidelity.
And if you’re a public figure or celebrity, let the media report or cover it - then you’ll get the publicity you wanted anyway without the legal liabilities for cyberlibel and data privacy.
When you present the screenshots as evidence in court, that’s when the Supreme Court ruling will apply - that taking screenshots of private conversion is not a violation of the right to privacy when used as evidence in a criminal case.
What’s unfortunate and what I find personally wrong in leaking the screenshots of Maris Racal and Anthony Jennings through social media is the slutshaming of Maris Racal because of her supposed “thirst trap/hungry” messages.
Look what statements have gone viral. 3-4 messages from Maris Racal and only 1, barely viral, from Anthony Jennings (about him disgustingly using method acting as justification).
Cheating is bad. But so is misogyny, enabled by violating the right to privacy.
Victims have human rights. But vindicating your rights should not make more victims.
Even cheaters have human rights.
#Law101
#HumanRights
@Koreaboo There are many children of mixed Korean heritage from other countries. If the South Korean government helps these children and their foreign mothers come to Korea, it would be because they belong there. And their Korean fathers who abandon their children should be sent to jail