PJ

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@Thomasdelvasto_ Inner devil's advocat

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@ggreenwald Been available in Germany for a while already. Smart move actually: leverages the user's inner germophobe up to silence their inner critic. "I hated it, but not thaat much"

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@ovid_returns @InfamousStorm Would love to try. Any chance you can share a link? 🙏

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@imitationlearn @chrislakin I like the concept but share the difficulty at 3. While for comparison to release any purposefully induced tension is straight forward, releasing one I'm unaware of having imposed feels inaccessible. Asking "What if were doing the tension?" instead causes relief

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@nosilverv A problem is not a problem. Either what presents as problem has a solution. Else what is perceived (falsely) as problem has no solution. Acknowledging it's unsolvable then makes way to one of the problems of rectifying the false perception or of abandoning starter problem. Repeat

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@TonyTheLion2500 To prove the equality of two sets, a straightforward approach is to consider that the inequality is defined as an inclusion from left to right and from right to left, and then to prove both parts independently, but also being explicit about it.

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@TonyTheLion2500 Entertain these questions: what would it feel like if that which you are hard for on yourself was what you actually wanted? How would you feel with and about yourself if that which you hate yourself for was actually what you wanted for yourself?

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@martinmrmar Seems you have an older edition? This is from the fourth edition. Also, Tao has extensive errata on his blog, if ever you are in doubt.

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@martinmrmar Looks like the equality in the first line of the proof only would show that the new set of of subsets covers A (didn't check the details since it's. No explicit mention though why the new set of subsets has disjoint members?

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@martinmrmar Saw the picture, but more variety could help work out what's relevant in general and what's only specific to that one drawing. New idea. You looked a bit into the case C is the empty set. Have you also considered what B would have to look like if C was the entire set U?

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@martinmrmar Maybe less formally, the question is: for any given C, what (this what is B) do you have to take away so that only the part that lies inside of A (if any) remains. Maybe painting several Venn diagrams (featuring U, A, and distinct C) helps?

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@martinmrmar Proably: Let x in UF\UG, i.e. x in UF and x not in UG, i.e. there is f in F s.t. x in f and for all g in G we have x not in g.

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@martinmrmar @TonyTheLion2500 Then exists j in I, s.t. x in A_j/B_j.

[Yanis Varoufakis @yanisvaroufakis]

Let us end the lie that Israel is a democracy for the Jews living there. It is a ruthless tyranny with frequent elections that entrench the settlers' power. The struggle to liberate Palestinians from Apartheid must also be a struggle to liberate Israelis. https://t.co/AGB0KDoqgy

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@Earl_GreyT @AirbnbHelp Hi L J R! Lies are illegal here (content policy forbids "illegal content"). And my jurisdiction doesn't allow stipulations that exclude court access (even got call recordings via GDPR requests). It's on the table of their legal department. If necessary, I'll sue guest first, :-).

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

Hi @AirbnbHelp ! Why is it that you keep spreading lies on my listing via the guest's review for stay HM55ACT4CC? Last time I checked it was illegal, to tell damaging false statements in public, and you keep at it. See you and liar guest in court if need be.

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@AirbnbHelp Or is [email protected] a better point of contact than @AirbnbHelp ?

[PJ @SuperAirbnbHost]

@AirbnbHelp Will happily delete all tweets once offending illegal review has been deleted and lost bookings compensated.