My friend got married 3 years ago.
He earns ₹60,000 a month.
He pays the home loan, groceries, medicines, bills, and every household expense.
His wife earns ₹45,000.
According to him, her entire salary goes to her parents and brother. She has never contributed financially to the home they live in.
He has no emergency fund, no savings, and says he feels like an ATM, not a husband.
Serious question.
Why is it considered a husband's duty to provide for everyone, but a wife's income is often treated as her personal choice?
If a husband sent 100% of his salary to his own parents and expected his wife to run the house alone, would society defend him too?
Equal rights should come with equal responsibilities. Agree or disagree?
@hindipatrakar Ab dekhna...the husband will be forced to pay extortion money in the name of alimony and the bf will go to jail in the name of "🍇 under false promise of marriage".
The cheating raand will walk away free with cash and prizes. Great Indian Comedy Circus called Supreme Kotha. 🙄
Agra, Uttar Pradesh
A husband caught his wife with her boyfriend inside a hotel room.
The wife had filed a fake domestic violence case against her husband.
The husband said that she had filed the case to maintain her extramarital relationship.
Why are women like this?
Meet A wife who was caught in a hotel with her boyfriend.
The same wife has filed a domestic violence case against her husband and is receiving ₹30,000 per month as maintenance for herself and her child.
What’s even more shocking—she was caught in the hotel after leaving her child alone at home.
This is how some women misuse the law, alienate children from their fathers, and use them as weapons to extract money from their husbands while enjoying life with another man.
Perfect example of Gold-digger and adulterous wife..!
आगरा में एक ऐसा मामला सामने आया जिसने सभी को हैरान कर दिया
बताया जा रहा है कि एक महिला ने अपने पति पर 498A और घरेलू हिंसा का केस दर्ज कराया था
जिसके बाद उसे हर महीने ₹30,000 भरण पोषण के रूप में मिल रहे थे
पुलिस ने एक ओयो होटल में छापेमारी की, जहां उस महिला को दूसरे..Read news
We often hear about false cases being filed by outsiders, partners or spouses. But here, the accusation came from inside the man’s own home—from his own sister.
She reportedly accused her 24-year-old brother of r@pe after he scolded her for going out with her boyfriend. During the trial, she withdrew the allegations, and the court acquitted him due to contradictions and lack of evidence.
But who will return the two years he lost in jail? Who will repair the reputation destroyed by the word “r@pist”?
When even a sister can allegedly weaponise such a serious law against her own brother, should false accusers still escape without punishment? Or has “believe every accusation” become more important than protecting innocent men?
Do you remember how she falsely accused an innocent delivery worker of attacking her?
He was arrested without any proof.
Later, he was released and filed an FIR against her, but she didn't face any punishment.
The more her body count is..the worse the relationship will be.
Because she can't bond with any other man.
She's damaged.
Her feminine sweet spot is Gone.
Avoid women with higher body counts.
Hanumant Patil committed suicide at Manchester, UK due fake cases and alimony extortion.
There is no outrage.
He had approached MRAs a few years back. They could only provide him with painkillers. They had no solutions for his problems. Getting out of fake cases and alimony extortion is almost impossible and it mostly depends on luck. Luck ran out for Hanumant. He distanced himself from those who were helping him and then it's just a matter of time.
Lawyers will say,"A dozen legal remedies are available."
Feminists will say,"This is a rare case. How did you know Hanumant did not demand dowry? If a man has done no wrong, he has nothing to fear."
Simps will say,"Think of Twisha Sharma before talking about Hanumant."
Advice for all the young men.
If you send a DM to a girl or reply to her post on social media and she ignores it,
Never ever text that girl again. Have self-respect.
I see girls posting selfies and getting 40-50 replies. She doesn't reply to 39.
Have some worth.
Read this to understand how biased and flawed the POCSO law is when it comes to consensual sex between teenagers.
Imagine a 16-year-old boy and a 16-year-old girl in a relationship who have consensual sex.
Both are the same age and willingly participated → The boy is still labelled a rapist.
If the girl later regrets it or her parents complain → The boy is treated as a rapist and faces punishment.
Even if the girl was equally willing and active → Only the boy is considered the offender.
But if a pedophile woman rapes an underage boy → She gets easy bail.
Real Case (Mumbai, 2025): A 40-year-old mother of 11-year-old twins and a school teacher raped her 16-year-old male student for over a year. With the help of her friend who groomed the boy, she took him to luxury hotels, gave him antidepressants, and called it “love”. Yet the court granted her bail.
Why is the law and judiciary so biased towards women?
If both are minors and the act was consensual, why is only the boy branded a rapist? Why doesn’t the girl bear the same responsibility?
Either make POCSO truly gender neutral
punish both equally or punish neither.
Stop destroying the lives of young boys in cases of mutual teenage relationships.