robby’s subconscious misogyny was unintentional. langdon tweaking his back was pball’s idea. the santos/langdon argument scene was originally far less nuanced until isa and patrick fought for the version we saw. so who tf is flying the plane because it sure isnt the writers
If anything, Fran ending up with Michaela ensures that the only driving force behind their relationship is love – not to continue the Kilmartin line, not because she feels the need to fulfill her duty as a wife to her late husband, but because she loves Michaela.
If one more person tried arguing that Francesca NEEDS a Micheal instead of Michaela in order to have children and continue the Kilmartin line, because that's what she apparently wants, i'm going to swan dive off a cliff
Not to mention the main point of Bridgerton is love conquers all, so why should Fran remarry just because she wants Kilmartin kids? That disregards the whole point of the show.