su su

Death is a certainty for all. If I could choose how I die, I would choose to die in the same way as Charlie Kirk.

[su su @susu622356]

Some accounts posing as members of President Trump's family may belong to the cyber warfare units of hostile nations. In an environment of free speech, such situations may be unavoidable, so everyone must be able to distinguish the real from the fake.

[su su @susu622356]

Why should all Muslims should leave the USA and all non-traditional-Islamic country？ You must leave, because your faith is incompatible with the civilized world. Any non-Islamic nation that allows you to exist will perish, much like a body succumbing to cancer. Those among you with vision and insight should join forces to initiate a fundamental, doctrine-based reformation within Islam—akin to the Protestant Reformation in Christianity—to strip away its extremist elements. Only by transforming Islam into a faith as benign to the rest of the world as Protestant Christianity can you reintegrate into the global community and become trusted allies, rather than remaining an actual or potential threat.

[su su @susu622356]

Yes, absolutely. Deport the criminals among them first; as for the other, more law-abiding undocumented immigrants, once deported, they could be offered a pathway—based on their cooperation—that grants them priority for legal entry into the U.S. and greater opportunities for advancement.

[su su @susu622356]

@JamesJo56909490 Yes. Absolutely.

[su su @susu622356]

@Luna_Jones79 Yes. Absolutely.

[su su @susu622356]

@Trump_jrr1 Yes. Absolutely.

[su su @susu622356]

@Travelodge_G Yes. Absolutely.

[su su @susu622356]

@DaveBacorn85 Yes. Absolutely.

[su su @susu622356]

No. Putin said so. President Trump has never said so. You are nothing more than a foot soldier in Russia’s information warfare—everything you say echoes the Kremlin’s own talking points. In reality, Ukraine and the United States could never be enemies; they are steadfast allies. While it is natural for allies to occasionally have differing opinions, the fundamental nature of their alliance remains unchanged. Putin, by contrast, is an enemy to everyone—including Russia itself. Ultimately, it is far more likely that the U.S. will move to apprehend Putin—much as it sought to capture Maduro—rather than pressure Ukraine. Supporting Putin is not supporting Russia; it is destroying it. Those who truly support Russia—along with the entire U.S.-led coalition—should work together to partition Russia into more than 80 small, independent, peaceful, and harmless states. Each of the top 79 Russian leaders could take charge of one of these new nations, with the backing of the United States. They would become hereditary nobles, with their lineages potentially intertwined with the royal families of Japan and Britain. The remaining territory could be used to resettle those Russians currently serving in Ukraine. Once divided into these smaller entities, Russia would no longer pose a threat to the coalition, and all 80-plus states could enjoy a long era of peaceful development. This is the most advantageous path forward for Russia and the Russian people.

[su su @susu622356]

NO. Putin said so. President has never said so. You are nothing more than a foot soldier in Russia’s information warfare—everything you say echoes the Kremlin’s own talking points. In reality, Ukraine and the United States could never be enemies; they are steadfast allies. While it is natural for allies to occasionally have differing opinions, the fundamental nature of their alliance remains unchanged. Putin, by contrast, is an enemy to everyone—including Russia itself. Ultimately, it is far more likely that the U.S. will move to apprehend Putin—much as it sought to capture Maduro—rather than pressure Ukraine. Supporting Putin is not supporting Russia; it is destroying it. Those who truly support Russia—along with the entire U.S.-led coalition—should work together to partition Russia into more than 80 small, independent, peaceful, and harmless states. Each of the top 79 Russian leaders could take charge of one of these new nations, with the backing of the United States. They would become hereditary nobles, with their lineages potentially intertwined with the royal families of Japan and Britain. The remaining territory could be used to resettle those Russians currently serving in Ukraine. Once divided into these smaller entities, Russia would no longer pose a threat to the coalition, and all 80-plus states could enjoy a long era of peaceful development. This is the most advantageous path forward for Russia and the Russian people.

[su su @susu622356]

@0veiledleaks1 A. YES. Absolutely.

[su su @susu622356]

The key lies in everyone working together to facilitate military reform in the United States—for instance, by employing a lend-lease-style approach to ensure that all allies can, at any time, acquire robust military capabilities. Then the USA helps allies to arrest Putin just as it has done to Maduro. The United States should implement a military "Lend-Lease" system. Under a "Lend-Lease" style framework, allies—such as Ukraine—would pre-plan advantageous war strategies. The U.S. would provide—via a paid lease arrangement—military assets amounting to no more than 40% of the total required force, thereby enabling the allies to achieve overwhelming military superiority. Strategic Outsourcing and the "Lend-Lease" Model:
The U.S. should no longer shoulder the direct burden of overseas wars alone. Instead, by leasing cutting-edge weaponry and elite personnel, as well as providing intelligence support to core allies—such as Israel, Japan, Taiwan, and Ukraine—the U.S. would enable these partners to possess combat capabilities nearly on par with the U.S. military.

Plan Formulation: Allied commands would draft operational plans designed to achieve both "rapid victory" and "50 years of enduring peace."

U.S. Review: The U.S. Department of Defense would conduct rigorous war-game simulations of the plans. Approval would be granted only if the probability of success exceeds 90% and long-term stability is assured.

Joint Execution: The U.S. would provide technology and personnel on a lease basis, while allies would lead ground combat operations.

Outcome Sharing: Post-conflict, allies would cover the costs of the lease and combat operations, while both the U.S. and the allies would share the strategic dividends and regional benefits resulting from the war.

[su su @susu622356]

@0veiledleaks1 No. Putin and his ciber-war soldiers want this. Most people in Ukraine love President and reespect him, and regard him as a Hero.

[su su @susu622356]

@RedlineAmeric Hero.

[su su @susu622356]

@Patriotism87543 Yes. President Zelenskeyy is a Good man and a Hero.

[su su @susu622356]

B) No, respect Brexit 🔴 The existence of the European Union has pushed once-powerful nations to the brink of collapse and death. The United Kingdom should not remain part of the EU, nor should it be subject to its regulations, follow its lead in opening borders, or continue along a European trajectory that leads, step by step, toward destruction.

[su su @susu622356]

@NewsRoomUS Resolute commander

[su su @susu622356]

The key lies in everyone working together to facilitate military reform in the United States—for instance, by employing a lend-lease-style approach to ensure that all allies can, at any time, acquire robust military capabilities. Then the USA helps allies to arrest Putin just as it has done to Maduro. The United States should implement a military "Lend-Lease" system. Under a "Lend-Lease" style framework, allies—such as Ukraine—would pre-plan advantageous war strategies. The U.S. would provide—via a paid lease arrangement—military assets amounting to no more than 40% of the total required force, thereby enabling the allies to achieve overwhelming military superiority. Strategic Outsourcing and the "Lend-Lease" Model:
The U.S. should no longer shoulder the direct burden of overseas wars alone. Instead, by leasing cutting-edge weaponry and elite personnel, as well as providing intelligence support to core allies—such as Israel, Japan, Taiwan, and Ukraine—the U.S. would enable these partners to possess combat capabilities nearly on par with the U.S. military.

Plan Formulation: Allied commands would draft operational plans designed to achieve both "rapid victory" and "50 years of enduring peace."

U.S. Review: The U.S. Department of Defense would conduct rigorous war-game simulations of the plans. Approval would be granted only if the probability of success exceeds 90% and long-term stability is assured.

Joint Execution: The U.S. would provide technology and personnel on a lease basis, while allies would lead ground combat operations.

Outcome Sharing: Post-conflict, allies would cover the costs of the lease and combat operations, while both the U.S. and the allies would share the strategic dividends and regional benefits resulting from the war.

[su su @susu622356]

@RedlineAmeric B) No. I think Elon Musk never said so. Zelenskyy is the best wartime president for Ukraine and the whole alliance.

[su su @susu622356]

Yes. The key lies in everyone working together to facilitate military reform in the United States—for instance, by employing a lend-lease-style approach to ensure that all allies can, at any time, acquire robust military capabilities. Then the USA helps allies to arrest Putin just as it has done to Maduro. The United States should implement a military "Lend-Lease" system. Under a "Lend-Lease" style framework, allies—such as Ukraine—would pre-plan advantageous war strategies. The U.S. would provide—via a paid lease arrangement—military assets amounting to no more than 40% of the total required force, thereby enabling the allies to achieve overwhelming military superiority. Strategic Outsourcing and the "Lend-Lease" Model:
The U.S. should no longer shoulder the direct burden of overseas wars alone. Instead, by leasing cutting-edge weaponry and elite personnel, as well as providing intelligence support to core allies—such as Israel, Japan, Taiwan, and Ukraine—the U.S. would enable these partners to possess combat capabilities nearly on par with the U.S. military.

Plan Formulation: Allied commands would draft operational plans designed to achieve both "rapid victory" and "50 years of enduring peace."

U.S. Review: The U.S. Department of Defense would conduct rigorous war-game simulations of the plans. Approval would be granted only if the probability of success exceeds 90% and long-term stability is assured.

Joint Execution: The U.S. would provide technology and personnel on a lease basis, while allies would lead ground combat operations.

Outcome Sharing: Post-conflict, allies would cover the costs of the lease and combat operations, while both the U.S. and the allies would share the strategic dividends and regional benefits resulting from the war.

[su su @susu622356]

Do not pretend to be a member of President Trump’s family. You are nothing more than a foot soldier in Russia’s information warfare—everything you say echoes the Kremlin’s own talking points. In reality, Ukraine and the United States could never be enemies; they are steadfast allies. While it is natural for allies to occasionally have differing opinions, the fundamental nature of their alliance remains unchanged. Putin, by contrast, is an enemy to everyone—including Russia itself. Ultimately, it is far more likely that the U.S. will move to apprehend Putin—much as it sought to capture Maduro—rather than pressure Ukraine. Supporting Putin is not supporting Russia; it is destroying it. Those who truly support Russia—along with the entire U.S.-led coalition—should work together to partition Russia into more than 80 small, independent, peaceful, and harmless states. Each of the top 79 Russian leaders could take charge of one of these new nations, with the backing of the United States. They would become hereditary nobles, with their lineages potentially intertwined with the royal families of Japan and Britain. The remaining territory could be used to resettle those Russians currently serving in Ukraine. Once divided into these smaller entities, Russia would no longer pose a threat to the coalition, and all 80-plus states could enjoy a long era of peaceful development. This is the most advantageous path forward for Russia and the Russian people.