@WeAreCanProud@fordnation@MarkJCarney@PierrePoilievre@ONAttorneyGen
There are participants in the world's most peaceful protest that you are all still persecuting and/or have completed their punishment for exposing you. You violated a court order that permitted the convoy dated Feb 18, 2022
Sue, you keep saying advocacy journalists have to "get the story right." But where exactly was Aidan wrong? He’s the one who exposed Michael Proctor’s conflicts, dug up the 2:27 AM Google search, and uncovered a systemic scandal so bad it got an entire State Police unit dismantled.
The Commonwealth didn't indict him for making things up. They indicted him because he was loud, in their face, and caused key witnesses and public officials "emotional harm."
The First Amendment doesn't care if you answer to an editor, play nice, or pass a J-school ethics class to avoid going to prison. If a reporter actually gets the facts wrong, the legal remedy is a civil defamation lawsuit—which the Alberts and McCabes have already filed.
Let's not forget Jen McCabe and Chris Albert already tried to silence @DoctorTurtleboy in civil court and failed. Between May and September 2023, both of them tried to slap him with Chapter 258E Harassment Prevention Orders to shut down his coverage. Two different judges shot them down.
The judges looked at it and basically said that no matter how offensive or distressing his coverage was, he was acting as the press. Because he wasn't making "true threats" or using "fighting words," his speech was fully protected by the First Amendment.
So what happened next? DA Michael Morrissey went crying to the Attorney General's office begging them to file criminal charges, and the AG basically told him to kick rocks.
He needed to figure out a way to do it on his own. And he did by employing corrupt and conflicted LEOs embedded in the Read Case as well as an informant with a personal vendetta against him.
The answer to journalism you find distasteful is never weaponizing a witness intimidation statute to throw a critic in solitary confinement.
When you argue that constitutional rights only belong to people who clear your subjective "ethical bar," you're just handing the state the power to lock up anyone they don't like.
It’s reminiscent of the DOJ using their power against journalists who factually report on the current president, like they did to Don Lemon, the Washington Post journalists, etc.
If “mainstream” journalists/reporters don’t start standing up and reporting on what’s happening to Aidan Kearney it’s co-signing the behavior of the government—in my opinion—and this will eventually trickle up.
@KimB1403@jessmachadoshow@BHBSKINCARE She gets views...it's all about the money. She provokes the critique and reactions to her own content...that content pushes views of her content...rinse repeat cash in!