There seems to be a lot of confusion on the SWFC zero point ruling when comparing to the zero points Derby also received.
Both Clubs paid/are paying 25p in the £ to unsecured creditors.
Derby’s owner completely wrote his debt off. The Wednesday owner was made a sizeable offer.
Derby paid 25p in the £ and left the tax man owed £10’s of millions (EFL Insolvency Policy directs 100p - discretion shown). Wednesday are paying off all owed (100p in the £) to HMRC.
I’m struggling to square why some feel Wednesday should get more than Derby got for exiting Administration when the shortfall to creditors is so much less in the case of SWFC?
Furthermore, the shortfall against EFL Insolvency Policy is also much less in the case of SWFC.
⏰ Tonight. 6pm.
💷 @MattJohno1989 is joined by @KieranMaguire to talk about the state of play at #SWFC after recent developments.
📺 LIVE on YouTube.
🙏 Please RT.
https://t.co/JshR9Ion9l
Make sure you join us LIVE from 8pm tomorrow over on YouTube.
🇩🇪 Danny's future.
👋🏼 Windass and Smith leave.
🚧 North Stand in doubt.
...and more.
🙏🏼 Please RT.
https://t.co/0Pbsfa820t
@MyFitnessPal can we have the newsfeed back please? People made close nit friends that gave help and support. It's just horrible now. Don't understand how you can say it was an underused feature. #mfp