@LucasNavallo@ShanePaisios Okay, so what? I'm an Anglican and believe Anglicanism is true; I'm not here to defend protestantism. Do you wish to defend Ecclesialism or Eastern Orthodoxy?
I explained to you on the phone, there is nothing inconsistent or "spiritually confusing" about the CofE originally being iconoclastic because of medieval abuses and then bringing back iconography once the abuses are gone, and condemning iconoclasm.
Hookers Laws Bk IV Cp XII
@dcommini@LucasNavallo@ShanePaisios Please show me where I was corrected. The OP literally said "Interesting" in response to me saying that the universal interpretation of the church is a binding authority, and hes wrong, he then asked me about private judgment and I sent an article that further explains.
crickets
@calvingelical@bluegrasspresby I had a phone call with him last night over iconoclasm, and I'm apparently inconsistent and confused because I think iconoclasm is bad and iconography is adiaphora.
@LucasNavallo@ShanePaisios Here is why the framework is correct: if you do not have this framework, then you put your faith in the church and not the authority of God revealing.
@ShanePaisios@LucasNavallo IQ self-report: you have no idea what "rule" means lmao.
It defines a rule in the SS; the SS also specifically says that the universal witness of the church fathers is a binding authority upon the conscience.
@IndianaBrunner St. Paul, the guy who wrote that children are made holy by the faith of their parents in 1 Cor. 7?
Does 'holy' there imply innate moral perfection? Or is Paul following the core biblical definition of holiness: being 'set apart' and consecrated into a covenant relationship?