We all know she had her moments but Nanna was an unforgettable woman. We’ll be holding a small memorial service for her this Friday at Kirkdale Community Centre
Rioters get jail time handed down within a week but the man who is on video trying to behead another gets 4 weeks minimum to mount a defence?
Not two tier…
Nothing to see here
Today Andy Burnham says he will NOT call a General Election if he becomes Labour leader & the UKs Prime Minister…
Oh but here he is demanding one from the Tories in July 2022.
But this isn’t hypocrisy, it’s totally different, absolutely different … totally different 🤡
The vast difference in total cost of very different “rule breaking” for 2 Premier League clubs: 💰
—
🔵⚪️
EVERTON narrowly overspending on PSR due to interest payments on a new stadium at the end of the 2021/22 season:
- Loss of league position prize money = £27m
- Compensation to Burnley = £40m
- Legal and administrative costs defending multiple cases, appeals and the Burnley tribunal = £17m
(Not to mention damage to brand, damage to squad mentality, damage to prospect of potential new signings & attracting potential managers & new ownership, damage to sponsors and massive reduction in broadcasting and commercial income)
TOTAL COST: £84m 💰
—
⚪️🔵
Chelsea blatantly cheating for 7 straight years with 74 for charges for funnelling £47.5m in 36 secret, off the books payments (via shady third parties and offshore entities) to unregistered agents & player reps from 2011-2018 to grease deals for stars like Hazard, Willian, Eto’o, Ramires, David Luiz, Schürrle and Matic in order to win:
▪️ 2012 UEFA Champions League
▪️ 2012 FA Cup
▪️ 2013 UEFA Europe League
▪️ 2015 Premier League
▪️ 2015 League Cup
▪️ 2017 Premier League
▪️ 2018 FA Cup
TOTAL COST: £10.75m 💰
—
CHELSEA escaped with a mere £10.75m fine for systematically concealing backhanded payments over seven years to rig transfers and gain real sporting advantage by winning 7 trophies during their 7 year period of dodgy deals.
This grotesque disparity, punishing the likes of Everton who could have - and arguably should have - been relegated with the harsh points deductions issued, while slapping the wrist of the profligate powerful, exposes football’s rotten core.. rules enforced not by justice, but by current club size, influence and the Premier League’s embarrassingly obvious selective blindness.
It’s even more laughable when you consider the three panel members who decided to issue this ground breaking never been done before compensation claim to Burnley from Everton.. were somehow the same three panel members who dished out the harshest points deduction in English top flight history to Everton for the very same reason!?
How on earth is that allowed?
English football, rotten to the core!
I don’t trust politicians
I don’t trust the medical profession
I don’t trust the media
I don’t trust the police
I don’t trust the food industry
I don’t trust the royal family
Have I missed anyone?
Vickrum Digwa’s brother, Gurpreet Digwa, 27, lied to police that Henry Nowak hadn’t been stabbed and had racially attacked his brother, perverting the course of justice.
Police also recorded him conspiring with Vickrum in a police car.
Six months later, he was arrested on multiple weapons charges and is currently on bail.
Meanwhile, Reece Robinson, 21, threw two stones at the Southampton police protest, hitting no one, and was jailed for 2 years and 1 month within 7 days.
🚨NEWS: It has been revealed that the NHS are kicking patients off waiting lists then re-admitting them as new patients to artificially hit the Labour Governments targets
Well the pattern is now set:
Atrocity
Condemn in weakest terms possible
Calls for calm
Angry scenes
Family of victim used
Full force of the law
New laws limiting everyone's freedom
Ignore problem that caused atrocity
So: a further utterly NONSENSICAL aspect of the ruling against Everton by the independent commission is that they openly admit to relying heavily on evidence from David Baldwin to establish the link between £19.5m overspend and the 4 points extra Everton gained ahead of Burnley.
1. David Baldwin, and by the IC's OWN ADMISSION, had spent 6 years being associated with Burnley.
2. His testimony was treated as that of an 'expert' despite him admitting he was using his "lived experience". Seriously?
3. The gist of Baldwin's argument was that Everton's £19.5m overspend - which was cumulative over 3 years - could you be used entirely to support the extra 4 points Everton gained over and above Burnley in the one season, 21/22. This was without him using any mathematical, statistical or probabilistic modelling - just 'lived experience'
4. Remember, we already established that the IC thinks a PSR breach can occur at anytime, 365 days a year, during a 3 year cycle - and not at the point they are actually tested. This is 'dangerous & unworkable' as Everton put it in their statement & also highly likely why they were so angry. There is no way the rules were drafted to intend this. It also means if you were already in breach of PSR but sold hotels or your women's team to cure it, you are still in breach. Clearly a nonsense, because in several instances these "cures" have been allowed - *as long as it was done by the financial year end, when PSR was being tested*. This is a key pillar of Everton's defence - Burnley were relegated before Everton's year-end and so a PSR breach had not yet occured.
5. Baldwin's testimony is used to rebuff that; he infers that sporting advantage was gained already at the start of the season because Everton did not reduce their squad/sell players/adjust their PSR position. Not true. Everton submitted an initial PSR position showing compliance - they did not set out to breach.
Look at that stare. What do you see? I will tell you what I see. A man who resents the public he serves. A man who does not like ORDINARY PEOPLE having a VOICE.
Keir Starmer told the world Britain is not censoring anyone. THIRTY ARRESTS A DAY for social media posts says otherwise.
Over 30 arrests a day for tweets. A threatened X ban. AI scanning every phone in Britain.
US Congress named him personally in a censorship report. The US State Department warned Britain it was going down a dark path.
That is not a policy. That is not the truth. And we are all living inside it.
America is fighting harder for British free speech than the British Prime Minister is. The US State Department named him. US Congress named him. Both warned him. Both stood up for British citizens' right to speak.
And Starmer's response was to plan software that scans every phone in Britain. The country that wrote Magna Carta is being defended by Washington.
They told you the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. What it actually does is give Ofcom the power to decide what you are allowed to say. Ofcom answers to the government. You do not get a vote. You just get arrested for it.
Thirty people a day found that out in 2023. That is not child protection. That is POPULATION CONTROL.
Free speech is not a far right value. It is not a racist value. This is about a government that cannot answer the questions ordinary people are asking. So instead of answering them they are criminalising them.
When they take that they take everything.
Britain gave the world the right to speak. Keir Starmer is trying to take it back. WE WILL NOT LET HIM.
The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!
Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)
Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.
The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.
many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.
Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.
He's not bothered about child sexual exploitation on Pornhub, OnlyFans, Roblox, or any of the countless platforms where children are groomed, abused, and exploited. He's not demanding tougher sentences for predators. He's not demanding the closure of sites that profit from sexual content children can access. He wasn't particularly interested when the BBC spent decades covering for prolific celebrity nonces or when LBC parade around government psyop whore Bonnie Blue.
What he cares about is @X.
Because X is where people get news, compare notes, share evidence, and discover that what is happening in one town is happening in another. From Penzance to Portugal - we are one.
The pretence is that this is about "misinformation" and "encitement", but the actual target is the means by which ordinary people communicate with each other.
They've tried destroying our pubs and our churches and communities - where we congregate and talk and unite. But we found somewhere else, so that has to be destroyed too.
What they forget is that the British were organising long before mobile phones, the internet, social media, television, radio, or newspapers.
For a thousand years we organised rebellions, uprisings, protests, petitions, and resistance movements armed with little more than word of mouth, churchyards, market squares, pubs, and messengers on horseback.
The Iceni managed it.
The Cornish managed it.
The Levellers managed it.
The Chartists managed it.
The people who fought the Romans, the Vikings, the Normans, and every other power that tried to impose itself upon them managed it.
If people are angry enough, they will find each other.
They always have.
Everton are being “set up” so they can change the rules, in order to ensure clubs cannot sue a certain other club in the not too distant future…. #everton