@_hoomanism Which is to say that few companies, like IDEO, can afford to make mistakes or not have their products sell a lot of units. But for most businesses that make products themselves and have them be accessible, systemic design is more helpful in integrating as many factors as possible
@_hoomanism IDEO is a design consultancy firm. They create design solutions for other businesses but don't go to market with products themselves. While the success of their clients' products are important, there IDEO is in a position of less risk...
@_hoomanism Systematic design may be less related to human behavior but with that is the intent of having systems that can be continue to be modified to suit changing circumstances #Twitwar1
@_hoomanism profit isn't everything, although it determines the viability of a business's products in the market. Business success is an undeniable indicator of the success of design. See institutions such as Braun, Apple, etc.
@_hoomanism Systemic design appeals to humanity and reason as well, but in different ways we've mentioned in previous arguments eg satisfying stakeholder groups, CSR, having an integrated approach.
Systemic design integrates the mindsets and toolsets of systems thinking and design thinking to encourage innovative systems change #TwitWar1 https://t.co/azsSH7qUvr
@_hoomanism Plus, while it is important to consider the minority when designing products, it mustnt be at the expense of the needs of the majority. Considering we live in a mostly capitalist/consumerist society, the latter is a foremost objective of most businesses.
@_hoomanism Designing a product using a humanist approach doesn't ensure that the product will get to that end user, even if it was designed with them in mind. Again, other factors are involved. Systemic design considers those factors.
@_hoomanism ...which is to say it has become more accepted. Jony Ive as able to focus on his design process and craft, along with the ID team at Apple, because of systems in place that allows that focus to occur.