@MichaelZed@emerek85@tnewtondunn That’s my point. SL does not restrict its usage on any type of equipment, unless it’s offensive operation. Ukraine doesn’t conduct that at the moment. But Russians were restricted from using SL in Ukraine for exactly that reason- offensive ops.
@blinachka@AhlinFredrik@emerek85@MichaelZed@tnewtondunn There is no rule against using offensive equipment in SL. Offensive equipment is always used during defence and it does not turn defence in offence. Artillery is an example. SL can’t be used during offensive operations, which Ukraine does not conduct at the moment.
@CommanderORly@rosuo@klickundkrise@clashreport And how the things are going now? Finally took Mala Tokmachka, nuclear superpower? I mean 1500 days should be enough I guess for someone this mighty.
@rosuo@klickundkrise@clashreport We should APPRECIATE Putin for his RESTRAINT? A nuclear state attacked non-nuclear state unprovoked and we should appreciate that he didn’t use nw because we tried to destroy smth that was used to attack civilians? Are you deranged?
@rosuo@klickundkrise@clashreport So we should listen to those threats and just surrender or endure attacks on the civilians for what? For you to sleep better? West is not doing enough to stop Russia economically, we don’t get PAC-3 and we can’t attack launchers. So what exactly do you propose?
@klickundkrise@clashreport Do you know how many times we targeted smth from that doctrine? “Spiderweb operation” is one example. Radar in Crimea is another. There are more. We even went into Kursk (invasion is directly mentioned as a trigger) and guess what? Nothing happened.
@klickundkrise@clashreport Stop with that old tune. “Don’t attack Crimea, fleet, airplanes, oil refineries - you will trigger WW3, nuclear war”. Surprise! We did that multiple times- nothing happened. And nothing will. Do you really think Russia will attack USA over Starlink?
@emerek85@MichaelZed@tnewtondunn So basically any use of attack drone is offensive. For instance, if you attack a tank during enemy’s offence, you are still in “offence for defence” and that is against SL rules. With that logic there is no sense in using SL at all.
@emerek85@MichaelZed@tnewtondunn So attack drones cannot be used for defence? If you are attacking supply lines of the invading army it’s still defence obviously.
@lolapalmer27@EDHanlon2@Maks_NAFO_FELLA The question was not “why not” but “did they actually do that”. And I haven’t seen anything confirming the attacks. Personally I hope Ukraine will bomb the hell out of those refineries
If this world survives, history books will have a lot to say about Ukraine's defense from the world's major nuclear powers, once rivals, now joining forces to make us surrender.
@L65094341@Ola89906221@Mylovanov OMG, we were not just coherent enough, so we actually deserved ethnic cleansing by Poland?? There was ZUNR, which you cannot compare to DPR because it was founded on ethnic principle. And where was strong and coherent Poland for 123? Maybe you didn’t deserve your state as well
@L65094341@prefsapidev@Ola89906221@Mylovanov And what about pacification? I’m going to say that what UPA did was ok. What I say is that what Poland did (occupation, pacification, ethnic cleaning) was not ok and you should own it as well. Was is not ok is saying that of 20000 Ukrainians is nothing because it’s smaller number
@L65094341@Ola89906221@Mylovanov Are you going to rename the units named after AK and remove the monument to Pilsudsky in Warsaw? You do your part, we do ours. Or we could leave history where it belongs for now and deal with current threats.
@prefsapidev@Ola89906221@Mylovanov Do you think I like to see Pilsudsky monument in Warwav after what he did to Ukrainians? If I can deal with that you can too