Poetry isn’t merely an arrangement of beautiful words; it’s a vessel for esoteric ‘meanings’ the poet holds and wishes to disclose, which each reader receives according to their own capacity.
His brilliant playlist explaining Shaykh Ibn Sina's Ilāhiyyat is sitting at around 1K views while Muhammad Hijab's 'Londoniyyah' videos for God's existence are at 100K+ views. What an actual disaster...
He's not just defending AI energy use. He is smuggling in a whole anthropology where humans are basically inefficient meat computers that you have to pour food and years into before they become useful. And once you accept that, the next move is obvious. If people are just costly biological training runs, then burning mountains of electricity to build synthetic intelligence starts to feel not only equal, but superior, even if it negatively impacts actual humans.
That is the dystopian. It makes human development sound like a bug in the system, and it makes sacrificing human and creational flourishing for more computational power sound logical. To him, the grid gets strained, prices go up, ecosystems get hit, but hey, humans eat too, so what's the difference?
The difference is that humans aren't an inefficient line item. They're the point. If your worldview can look at a child growing into an adult and describe it as energy spent to train intelligence, you haven't said something profound. You've revealed a horrifically rotten worldview.
If you read Guénon's reign of quantity, you're on the bleeding edge of the future. If you're reading modern non-fiction, you're about 500 years in the past. My neighbor is reading a nonfiction book about the value of secularism over religiosity. It's not 1640. If you're reading the new York times, you're unaware it's 2026. You don't have to read state press. You're paying indulgences in the dark ages, likely to "educational" institutions