A writing student asked me if it's okay to use AI to "structure" his ideas—not to "write" but "just to "structure."
Very gently, but with all the passion in my heart, I said, "No."
And then I spoke with him about why:
Structuring a piece of writing *is* writing. Imagine if whatever made the Universe had said, "I just need something else to structure all this stuff."
The act of structuring, of finding forms—whether it takes hours of inspiration or years of study (and it takes both)—is the unique chance to find out who you are, why you create, and what creation is.
Don't take that away from yourself. If you do, soon there will be nothing in you—nothing unique, nothing ancient, nothing new—to structure at all.
@DonaldClark@Steve_R_Price The word that stands out here is Support. The reality is the students are doing input/output. You have offered an off ramp from thinking/creating/analyzing/synthesizing…all skills that will be lost or never even gained when subbing AI for learning
@Steve_R_Price I really benefited from not using Canvas much. Senior grades are due and many of my colleagues were panicked. Something to be said about good ole’ pen and paper.
@Steve_R_Price I feel like the words AI and student don’t go together. Students are there to learn and develop expertise. AI seems like it’s for those who could do it by themselves and are merely using a tool for extra ideas/efficiency.
@Steve_R_Price I think there are different purposes. Close reading of passages helps students take a look at specific moments, and the style/craft the author used to create that. While whole book builds stamina to look at the story/character arcs and broader themes.
dear apple, the iPod needs to come back. not for nostalgia. for the parents who want their kids to love music and audiobooks without a browser, social media, and the whole internet attached to it