https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social

No longer here - find me on Bluesky (She/her) Founder @WeandAI | @ImagesofAI

[Jornadas D+i 2026 @jornadasDmasI]

#PONENTES

@TanDuarte es fundadora de @WeandAI, una ong en el Reino Unido que busca mejorar la alfabetización en IA para promover la inclusión social.

En #Dmasi2024 tendremos la oportunidad de disfrutarla en una charla y un workshop.

Conócela👉https://t.co/GsCNJKugD7

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

@neilturkewitz @GaryMarcus @ptknitwear Hahaha. Imagine if the book store employee came and suggested you ask them this in person. That would for sure freak me out.

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

“The reason we’re confident of our assessments is that they are not based on limitations of the technology. Instead, they are based on inherent limits to prediction grounded in our sociological analysis.”

The book we’ve been waiting for!

[Arvind Narayanan @random_walker]

📢 AI Snake Oil is out today! I have too many feelings because this book has been five years in the making. In 2019 I gave a talk on AI Snake Oil and tweeted out the slides. I had no idea my career was about to change. Within a couple of days I had 30 or 40 invites to write a book or an article. I said no to all of them because I felt I needed to do more research to be able to write a book. So when @sayashk joined my team I knew this was the topic we were going to work on. The book is based on our research on limits to prediction, the dangers of predictive decision making, the reproducibility crisis in machine learning based science, the limits of large language models, and the risks of social media algorithms.

The book is not an anti-technology screed. If our point was that all AI is useless, we wouldn’t need a book to say it. It’s precisely because of AI’s usefulness in many areas that overhyped claims and outright snake oil have been so successful in the market. It’s hard for people to tell these apart, and we hope our book can help. And while we think the tech industry should have much more accountability, the harms we describe are usually not solely due to tech, and much more often due to AI being an amplifier of existing problems in our society. A recurring pattern we point out in the book is that "broken AI is appealing to broken institutions" (Chapter 8).

Since our book talks about what AI can’t do, AI boosters often tell us it’s going to be outdated soon. If you think so, I’d love to have a friendly bet! Read the book and tell us what you think will be wrong in two years or five years. (You can start with the intro chapter, which is available online; the link is in my pinned tweet.) The reason we’re confident of our assessments is that they are not based on limitations of the technology. Instead, they are based on inherent limits to prediction grounded in our sociological analysis. (The book owes a huge debt to Princeton sociologist @msalganik; our collaboration with him informed and inspired the book.) We also talk a lot about what we shouldn’t use AI for, even if we can.

We’ve had many moments of hope and trepidation for the book as we worked on it over the years. We’re so grateful for the early interest the book has had, especially to the 40,000 people who subscribe to the AI Snake Oil newsletter, and the many podcasts that have had us on to talk about the book. We’ve had great reviews in The New Yorker, Publishers' Weekly (featured in the Top 10 science books for Fall 2024), and many other outlets. And we’ve had such a wonderful experience working with Princeton University Press. We’re also fortunate to have received incisive peer reviews from @MelMitchell1 , @mollycrockett , @chris_bail, and three anonymous reviewers. The book is so much better as a result.

What's in the book

Chapter 1: Introduction. We begin with a summary of our main arguments in the book. We discuss the definition of AI (and more importantly, why it is hard to come up with one), how AI is an umbrella term, what we mean by AI Snake Oil, and who the book is for.

The entire introduction is available online. See the link in my pinned tweet.

Chapter 2: How predictive AI goes wrong. Predictive AI is used to make predictions about people—will a defendant fail to show up for trial? Is a patient at high risk of negative health outcomes? Will a student drop out of college? These predictions are then used to make consequential decisions. Developers claim predictive AI is groundbreaking, but in reality it suffers from a number of shortcomings that are hard to fix.

Chapter 3: Can AI predict the future? Are the shortcomings of predictive AI inherent, or can they be resolved? In this chapter, we look at why predicting the future is hard — with or without AI. While we have made consistent progress in some domains such as weather prediction, we argue that this progress cannot translate to other settings, such as individuals' life outcomes, the success of cultural products like books and movies, or pandemics.

Chapter 4: The long road to generative AI. Recent advances in generative AI can seem sudden, but they build on a series of improvements over seven decades. In this chapter, we retrace the history of computing advances that led to generative AI.

Chapter 5: Is advanced AI an existential threat? Claims about AI wiping out humanity are common. Here, we critically evaluate claims about AI's existential risk and find several shortcomings and fallacies in popular discussion of x-risk. We discuss approaches to defending against AI risks that improve societal resilience regardless of the threat of advanced AI.

Chapter 6: Why can't AI fix social media? One area where AI is heavily used is content moderation on social media platforms. We discuss the current state of AI use on social media, and highlight seven reasons why improvements in AI alone are unlikely to solve platforms' content moderation woes.

Chapter 7: Why do myths about AI persist? Companies, researchers, and journalists all contribute to AI hype. We discuss how myths about AI are created and how they persist. In the process, we hope to give you the tools to read AI news with the appropriate skepticism and identify attempts to sell you snake oil.

Chapter 8: Where do we go from here? While the previous chapter focuses on the supply of snake oil, in the last chapter, we look at where the demand for AI snake oil comes from. We also look at the impact of AI on the future of work, the role and limitations of regulation, and conclude with vignettes of the many possible futures ahead of us. We have the agency to determine which path we end up on, and each of us can play a role.

-------

We hope you find the book useful and look forward to hearing what you think.

[JC Gaillard @Corix_JC]

As the #AI Bubble Deflates, the Ethics of #Hype Are in the Spotlight

https://t.co/LFzMNwQkIl

@TechPolicyPress @TanDuarte @WeandAI #tech #business #leadership #LLM #genAI #generativeAI #SiliconValley #bigtech #hype #FOMO #founders #startups #investors #investments #VC #venturecapital

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

@_KarenHao @random_walker @sayashk Amazing! I can’t wait to read this. I will be signposting in the research presentation webinar for the AI and Ethics Journals “Ethical Implications of AI Hype” edition https://t.co/3oJGh3Evah

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

@Abebab @AIxDesignCo I’m sure someone in your community would love to help out with this?!!

[Abeba Birhane @Abebab]

correction: it's not "power shifting from humanity to alien intelligences" rather it's shifting power away from the masses towards big corporations and their share holders

[Yasmin Ibison @yasminibison]

@jrf_uk's new research with @WeandAI asks:

Why and how do non-profit and grassroots orgs engage with gen AI tools?

How do these orgs see their role in shaping the broader AI debate?

🌐Join me + the researchers to explore findings and key themes!

https://t.co/ChYcpDUL7Z

[Joseph Rowntree Foundation @jrf_uk]

59% of orgs feel they aren't engaged in the broader AI debate

Without sector engagement, initiatives aimed at developing AI for public good cannot have an adequate understanding of what that might entail

📑 Find out more from @yasminibison and @WeandAI: https://t.co/3NvyMY5r2l.

[Surrey Institute for People-Centred AI @PeopleCentredAI]

Opportunity! Fully-funded PhD in Responsible AI Literacy for Journalism. Includes work w/ @BBCRD, generous stipend, research & training funds. Fees UK rate, may waive difference for exceptional non-UK candidates. https://t.co/tf6p6LqmZa @Bahareh360
#AIJournalism #JournalismAI

[Alex Hanna (اليكس حنٌا) @alexhanna]

Something I truly appreciate about 404: their journalist-owned model really allows them to report out a story and call a thing like it is, without having to polish big tech turds

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

I’m looking forward to this!

[https://bsky.app/profile/weandai.bsky.social @WeandAI]

First up in our Deepfakes Deepdive starting soon: a fascinating panel exploring what influences public perception, policy and economic dynamics related to #deepfakes. Tickets are on https://t.co/Z9ipJkYg74. Then onto some more presentations, interviews and an interactive game!

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

The lineup for this event is incredible - please join to hear many different perspectives on the impacts and mitigations of deepfakes https://t.co/0Iqmfvq6uN

[Patricia Gestoso (Dr/She/Her) @p_gestoso]

I’m delighted to share that I’ll be a panelist at the virtual @WeandAI online event “Framing Deepfakes”

Register on the link below

@ImagesofAI
#GenAI #AI #Deepfakes #EthicalAI #InclusiveAI #TrustworthyAI #Sexism #Patriarchy

https://t.co/RFEM5ACUof

[Alex Hanna (اليكس حنٌا) @alexhanna]

We need to ban tech CEOs from using the term "democratizing"

What the hell does "democratizing creativity" mean? Are y'all blocking access to pens and paints?

[Eleonora Lima @limaeleonora1]

My article "AI art and public literacy: the miseducation of Ai-Da the robot" is now available in open access on the journal 'AI and Ethics.' It's part of a collection edited by @TanDuarte exploring the ethical implications of #AIhype. https://t.co/UwOa76oLsA

[https://bsky.app/profile/taniaduarte.bsky.social @TanDuarte]

Great thread on @gjnahelfrich’s critique of the term “frontier AI” - part of a collection of essays on the ethical implications of #AIhype completing soon https://t.co/5qwBFOgRpV. A webinar with the authors will be planned for the autumn - contact me or @WeandAI for details

[Abeba Birhane @Abebab]

read this short paper and thank me later
https://t.co/8BLiSNuWYY

you're welcome

[HMC (The Heads' Conference) @HMC_Org]

At #HMCSpringConf24 @tanduarte discusses the impact of #AI on #environmentalsustainabilty & #creativity in #education & urges delegates to consider the fact young people are learning about politics & current affairs against a backdrop of AI & #deepfake news none of us understand