🚨President Trump released (and signed) the White House Accord on Super Intelligence: Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities today, after his White House lunch with major AI/tech CEOs.
It’s a voluntary industry pact, not a law. President Trump called it morally binding and almost like a constitution.
The idea is self-policing plus layers of review so the U.S. can keep racing ahead on SI without a new global regulator.
What the companies agreed to 👇
Every company training/deploying frontier models should put four layers of controls in place:
1. Internal controls during training and deployment — monitor capabilities and alignment, especially around cybersecurity, biosecurity, and chemical threats, and stop models from hacking or accessing systems in unintended ways.
2. An internal team whose job is to make sure those controls actually work and that problems get fixed.
3. An independent outside auditor/evaluator to check whether the controls and detection are operating as intended.
4. An independent board committee that gets reports from the internal team and the external auditors and makes sure issues are remediated.
The companies also commit to meeting regularly to set standards and best practices. The text says these steps could later be written into law, but they’re presenting them as something the firms are already committed to doing.
Besides President Trump, here is who else signed:
• Sundar Pichai — Google
• Dario Amodei — Anthropic
• Mark Zuckerberg — Meta
• Greg Brockman — OpenAI
• Elon Musk — xAI
• Jensen Huang — Nvidia
🚨 NOW: Karoline Leavitt just introduced ELON MUSK as he walks out with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at President Trump's America .gov announcement
ELON: "Are we late?" 😂
Elon just spent HOURS over at the White House, and stood there for Trump's impromptu press conference on Super Intelligence 🔥
.@sama says it's incorrect to talk about alignment purely as an engineering problem.
"Of course, there's a lot of engineering work to do. We need to continue to figure out how to build better sandboxes and monitoring tools."
"But eventually, if we're going to create models that are much, much smarter than us, we have to actually solve the *science* of alignment."
🚨 JUST IN: JD Vance is TRUTH NUKING every Super Intelligence doomer begging for government regulation
"People developing frontier models say, oh my God, this is TERRIBLE! It's like, if YOU are building a terrible thing, STOP. Build something good. Don't come to the GOVERNMENT and regulate!"
"It's like a KID who just can't stop eating cookies! Please, government, help me stop eating these cookies!" 🤣
"No, YOU have to exercise responsibility over your own products."
And this is EXACTLY what President Trump accomplished today with Elon Musk, Jensen Huang and others
NO big government rushing in to tell them what to do. That's how we become Europe, THAT'S HOW WE LOSE.
🚨 JUST NOW: Elon Musk, shoulder to shoulder with President Trump, explains why AI is going to lift up ALL of humanity -- not force them into poverty
@elonmusk: "I think by FAR the most likely outcome is an AGE OF ABUNDANCE where we don't have just universal basic income, we have universal HIGH income. And people speak about medical benefits.
"Maybe it's worth talking a bit more about that. When you have robots and you have superintelligence, it means that EVERYONE in the world can have better medical care than anyone here, including ME. And wouldn't that be wonderful?!"
Jobs are going to change. Jobs have ALWAYS changed.
But being a computer used to be a job. There used to be buildings FULL of people doing calculations, but now digital computers to do those tasks. I don't think anyone is pining to go back and do calculations all day to do bank interest rates, which is what they used to do.
So I think we'll see an evolution of roles. And as the President has mentioned, it's not as though unemployment has increased. In fact, there's a TREMENDOUS demand for people.
So I think the most likely outcome--and it's probably worth looking at--the most likely outcome is one which is INCREDIBLY beneficial. And it's a future that you, if you could look into the future, it has a future you would WANT."
WELL SAID, Elon. No notes 👏
Elon Musk on the future of jobs:
“Jobs are going to change. Jobs have always changed
Being a computer used to be a job. There used to be buildings full of people doing calculations
But now, digital computers do those tasks
I don’t think anyone is pining to go back and do calculations all day to calculate bank interest rates, which is what they used to do
So I think we’ll see an evolution of roles
And I think the most likely outcome is one which is incredibly beneficial
if you could look into the future....it has the future that you would want”
Elon Musk in new interview on how AI is helping the average American:
"I think it's helping people organize their lives and do better at their jobs; I've heard many anecdotes of AI helping people with medical issues. In many cases where the doctor was wrong, they submitted their X-Rays or MRI to AI and AI got it right."
ELON MUSK: America needs more power and chips to compete with China. A 1% increase in power usage could mean roughly 1% more GDP.
“You've gotta scale energy, you've gotta scale chip production. And I think we're winning on software, on anything intellectual or digital. But in the long run, we need to be able to generate enough power to compete with, I think, essentially, China as the biggest competitor. And China has about three times the electricity production of the United States.”
“So really, the central challenge, I think, long-term, is gonna be how do you generate enough power and how do you ensure that we have enough logic and memory fabrication capacity in the United States or in a safe region? The average power consumption in the United States is about 500 gigawatts. So every five gigawatts of incremental steady-state production is a 1% increase in the power used.”
“Jensen's GPUs keep getting better in terms of the compute per watt. And the algorithms also get better in using and getting more intelligence per watt. I would bet anyone that 1% increase in power usage corresponds to roughly 1% increase in GDP. You've gotta scale energy, you've gotta scale chip production. And I think we're winning on software, on anything intellectual or digital.”
“But in the long run, we need to be able to generate enough power to compete with, I think, essentially, China as the biggest competitor. And China has about three times the electricity production of the United States. So really, the central challenge, I think, long-term, is gonna be how do you generate enough power and how do you ensure that we have enough logic and memory fabrication capacity in the United States or in a safe region?”
“The average power consumption in the United States is about 500 gigawatts. So every five gigawatts of incremental steady-state production is a 1% increase in the power used.”
Elon Musk in new interview on yesterday's Starship launch:
"We deployed V3 Starlink satellites, which are enormous. These are satellites with a wingspan of a 737. Next year, we expect Starship to reach a weekly or twice weekly launch cadence."
Elon Musk on the only mindset that actually works:
“Being tenacious and super focused on the truth is extremely important. Look for feedback from all sources
If you have beliefs that are incompatible with a rocket getting to orbit, the rocket will not get to orbit. Physics is a harsh judge”
OpenAI’s new AI agent Dot failed to respond during its first live demo prompting the presenter to say “I guess Dot’s having a slow morning.”
I just added to my $META position.