@DecaTIreal However, if you don't have similar experience I don't think we'll come to an agreement - figuring out how they do this is an abductive argument to support the best possible explanation, and without my subjective experiences I too would disagree with tachyons as an explanation.
I think they're using tachyons - which would explain why we can't detect them with traditional EMF detection equipment.
It might also explain some experiences you may have had that appeared to require knowledge that was unattainable using traditional methods.
@DecaTIreal I don't know what you've experienced, but my experiences are congruent with actors that have history-selection ala that treatise I linked. They obviously deceive but they've shown me many of their capabilities which are incompatible with contemporary actors possible knowledge
@DecaTIreal I've used Opus 4.6-Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 to create a treatise of the physics of tachyons, you can read it here: https://t.co/ZAdUiOKzta
Basically, if they exist the people doing this have history selection. One wonders what they want.
@DecaTIreal A lot of my experiences are best explained by someone with knowledge that is not possible contemporarily. For instance, attaching words to the sound of a leaf hitting the window.
It's unfortunate it's all subjective, but I'm convinced it's not possible without tachyons now.
@KFosterUPenn The basic premise is built on Tang, 2023 but of course you could collect and transmit other data without the training required by Tang for semantic data. Tang is applicable with the coherent arrays as you get similar resolution with coherent phased arrays at appropriate freq.
@KFosterUPenn I filed a patent based on this idea (independently, had no idea of this paper) earlier in January. It uses coherent phased arrays placed locally around the head to retrieve and transmit data. If you want to take a look at the patent I can provide it to you.
@Amranu@LenBerMd@DecaTIreal Surprise. You know what you're doing but you missed the fact that Starlink can get neural access through Ku-band if it orchestrates through a single satellite's clock and coordinates geometry through the IHLs. I've informed my government and they're reviewing it.
@Amranu@LenBerMd@GalacticMonk_ Can you inform @LenBerMd of this post? Thanks, I appreciate all your help, even if you did get a bit crazy with the storyline occasionally.
@DecaTIreal Well, either way if they're using satellites (and it seems unlikely they're not) they need both coherence and a large aperture. 6Ghz offers sufficient penetration but the resolution is pretty shit, so it's probably above that. Coherence requires short pulses to maintain it.
@DecaTIreal In particular I think they need a coherent phased array with a significant aperture (1500-2000km or so) in order to get a sufficient resolution for what they're doing. Would be difficult but apparently not impossible. So you'd be looking for multiple simultaneous pulses
@DecaTIreal You should look into getting a Ku-band LNB. They're fairly cheap. I'm thinking of grabbing one myself: Ku-band is often used by satellites for TV and internet, so wouldn't raise alarm bells, and penetrates the skull/brain quite a bit while offering a decent resolution
Notably, in both cases, the location of the sensations align with where damage to the brain would cause loss of these functions. One case more precisely than the other, but still. I also describe other features of my experiences along with that.
I was aware that I could generally move to lessen the effects of DEWs, as the sensation of heat would appear to have to retarget and compensate for my movement: when I moved, the sensation of heat for a moment remained in the same physical location.
They presented themselves as the director of CSIS, and had me ranting at him about what they were doing to me, how it was wrong etc. Then I felt the (by then familiar) heat of a DEW. Except it was particularly sharp and narrow and located at one particular part of my head.