@GenuineViltrum@judejon_@dmoonlives Matrilineal traits must be on mitochondrial DNA or the X chromosome. Height isn't. Genome studies on millions prove height is polygenic, mapped across autosomes (chromosomes 1-22) to be exact. You get an exact 50/50 genetic split from both parents. Basic chromosome biology.
@GenuineViltrum@judejon_@dmoonlives The fathers in ALL groups were short “No significant difference" just means the dads were consistently short across the clinic's subsets. It doesn't mean they didn't contribute genes. Learn what a controlled clinical sample is.
@GenuineViltrum@judejon_@dmoonlives Your own text shows Group 1 dads averaged 173.3cm vs Group 3 at 176cm. Short kids had short dads. If it were matrilineal, dad’s height wouldn’t matter. Learn what an F-value is.
@GenuineViltrum@judejon_@dmoonlives Height is a polygenic trait on autosomes. A strict 50/50 split from both parents. Then you pivot to bitch made insults the second you realize you're completely out of your depth on basic chromosome biology.
@GenuineViltrum@judejon_@dmoonlives Height is polygenic, inherited via autosomes from BOTH parents. You don't know how to read data, you don't understand polygenic inheritance, and you're using a 30 yr old abstract to argue against basic chromosome biology. Imbecile behavior.
@GenuineViltrum@judejon_@dmoonlives The rest shows the short kids had short dads AND short moms. If height were matrilineal, the fathers height wouldn't matter at all. A tiny study showing a slight statistical variance in maternal distribution doesn't rewrite genomics.
@czechiaenjoyer@CaptainFakecel You're confusing immediate mutation with evolutionary decay. If a critical Y gene mutates and causes infertility, that specific line ends. That’s exactly how a chromosome shrinks over time. Losing unviable lines is evolutionary pressure. Not proof the Y has permanently halted.
@JacobiBranich@RealCandaceO Well if prosecution has evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, then there’s no reason why a jury wouldn’t convict him. Right Jacobi?
@czechiaenjoyer@CaptainFakecel And lyonization is for female dosage compensation, unrelated to Y's lack of recombination. Palindromes slowed its recent decay, but it's not immune. Its long term survival is still debated. Also Y deletions absolutely can be passed down. The vulnerability is real.
@czechiaenjoyer@CaptainFakecel You’re throwing around big words but mixing up basic biology. The Y chromosome did not evolve as a "sex-selective hormone." It is a chromosome, not a hormone. It also didn't shed "redundant chromosomes.” That doesn't even make sense. It lost genes.
@GenuineViltrum@LXXIVXIV@judejon_@dmoonlives It just means maternal variance differed between clinic groups. Height is polygenic. Over 10000 variants split 50/50 across autosomes from BOTH parents. A growth clinic study doesn't rewrite basic biology.
@GenuineViltrum@LXXIVXIV@judejon_@dmoonlives You’re illiterate. Read your own citation. Group 1 fathers averaged 173.3cm meaning they were short too. The data literally proves both parents were short. You don’t even understand the F value you pasted.
@GordoG0rdie The word “maybe” was used because it was advice. I never said you had to do it :)
And I’m sorry to break it to you but I never reported your tweet lol.