བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན།

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@athletes_kotoba は？

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

@TeamYouTube My channel “ScalingStories” was flagged for “Inauthentic Content,” and my appeal was rejected. Before reapplying for the Partner Program, I extensively reviewed the guidelines and deleted a large amount of older content that may not have aligned with them.

I genuinely believe the current content on my channel follows the guidelines and deserves a fair manual review. My videos are recorded with my real voice, reactions, opinions, commentary, manual editing, recorded gameplay, custom avatars, and personal perspective.

My thoughts and commentary are an integral part of the channel and a major reason viewers come back. They engage with my voice, my reactions, and my perspective, not just the stories themselves.

I am respectfully requesting a human/manual review of my current channel with this context in mind.

Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

Thank you.

[chhavi💫 @abeyarrrrrr]

my queen

[rick grimes @folkxile]

THERES NO WAY

[Sansky @sanskarstine]

Yes, Child marriage and Incest is All Valid for them.

But apparently consentual love is not!!

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Day 38: Still respectfully requesting help from YouTube to get a real person to manually review my channel after being demonetized for “inauthentic content.”

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators

My videos are made with my own voice, commentary, reactions, manual editing, recorded gameplay, custom avatars, and personal perspective. I believe this is important context because YouTube’s guidelines describe inauthentic content as content that is mass-produced, repetitive, automated, or minimally transformed.

That is not how my videos are made. I do not simply read stories and repost them. I add my thoughts throughout the video, explain my perspective, react to the choices being made, and try to make the content entertaining, thoughtful, and useful for my audience.

Viewers frequently comment about my voiceovers and my thoughts, which shows that “me” as the creator is a unique and integral part of the videos. They are not only engaging with the stories. They are engaging with my voice, my commentary, and my personal contribution to the content.

Please help me get a manual review for my channel.

Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@RIO_AKIYAMA Slayyyyyy

[Jᴼᴬ @mycomf0rtz0ne]

“Everyone’s jealous of what you’ve got. No one is jealous of what you had to do to get it”

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@Taylors_Archive Fall for it every time

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

今日楽しかった!

[Taylor Swift in 4k @4k_taylorr]

4K | "I Knew it, I Knew You" Desktop Wallpapers

[MOMA @msnNightingale]

La selección nacional de fútbol de Japón, que actualmente entrena en México, cuenta con Kaishu Sano, un hombre arrestado por violación.

Esta es una foto de Sano. Se insta a las mujeres locales a estar alerta ante posibles violaciones
#futbol #fifaworldcup
#mundial2026 #mexico

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@Clapton_Free very true

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@minaduchi_jp 頑張って😍😍

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

Hello @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators,

It has been 33 days since I started trying to get in contact with someone, and I am still respectfully asking YouTube for a fair manual review of ScalingStories.

I understand YouTube has policies against automated, mass-produced, repetitive, or minimally transformed content, and I respect why those policies exist. I am not asking for special treatment or for any rules to be ignored.

I am only asking for the chance to have my channel reviewed by a real person with the full context of how my videos are made.

My videos are built around my own voice, commentary, reactions, editing, gameplay, avatars, and community. I do my best to make each video thoughtful, entertaining, and useful for my audience.

I do not simply read stories and repost them. I add my thoughts throughout the video, explain my perspective, react to the choices being made, and try to add meaningful value for viewers.

My viewers often respond directly to my commentary in the comments, which means a lot to me because it shows they are engaging with my personal contribution, not just the original story.

I believe my current channel may have been incorrectly categorized, because the work behind my videos does not match the examples YouTube gives for inauthentic content.

I would be extremely grateful if a real person could take another look at ScalingStories.

Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@Wbfaye99 Happy pride my wife

[བཀྲིས་གཡང་སྒྲོན། @tashiy92]

@Wbfaye99 I am here 😭 I miss you 😢

[ScalingStories @ScalingStories1]

I am still respectfully asking for help getting my channel, ScalingStories, manually reviewed by a real person after being demonetized for “inauthentic content.” I have been trying for weeks to explain my situation, and I feel completely lost because I still do not believe this label accurately reflects my channel or the work I put into my videos.

I understand why YouTube has policies against automated, mass-produced, repetitive, or minimally transformed content, and I respect those rules. I know YouTube has to protect viewers, advertisers, and the platform from content that does not add real value. I am not asking for those policies to be ignored. I am only asking for my channel to be reviewed with the full context of how my content is actually made.

My videos are voiced by me, edited by me, and built around my own commentary and reactions. I record my own gameplay/background footage, manually edit each video in DaVinci Resolve, and use custom avatars to represent myself while speaking to my viewers. This is not an automated process. It is a very manual one, and I put a lot of time and care into making the videos feel personal to my channel.

I do not simply read stories and repost them. I add my thoughts throughout the video, explain my perspective, react to the choices being made, and try to make the content entertaining, thoughtful, and useful for my audience. My viewers directly respond to my commentary in the comments, which shows they are engaging with my personal contribution, not just the original story.

This channel and community mean a lot to me. Even while demonetized, I have kept creating because I care about the viewers who show up for my videos, and I do not want to let them down. I am not asking for special treatment. I am only asking for a fair manual review from a real person.

Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan @UpdatesFromYT

#inauthenticcontent #youtube #youtubedemonetization #creatorsupport #youtubecreators #contentcreator #monetization #youtubepartner #fairreview #fixyoutube

[Olivia☔️🧷 @youroli0804]

Another topic discussed in the show is that lesbian couples are often subjected to questions rooted in heteronormativity. They also mentioned the lack of legal recognition for same-sex marriage and the gap between the marriage system and local partnership systems.