@TheGlare_TM@catturd2 The lead doctor at cincy hospital has publicly confirmed it wasn’t commotio c in demar Hamlin injury. You still crusading for the mainstream narrative counselor?
@GrogsGamut Harbaugh just wrote the script on how to get in joe b’s grill. They lived in the backfield and disrupted the swagless Cartier wearing gunslinger. They won’t get ticky tack holding calls going their way in buffalo next week.
@drsimonegold Why are you so defensive of big pharma? Why would anyone be so assertive against the possibility that maybe the enormously widespread vaccination could have negative consequences with a small portion of its recipients…. Especially top level athletes? It’s weird!
@hodgetwins Why are you so defensive of big pharma? Why would anyone be so assertive against the possibility that maybe the enormously widespread vaccination could have negative consequences with a small portion of its recipients…. Especially top level athletes? It’s weird!
@TedNugent Why are you so defensive of big pharma? Why would anyone be so assertive against the possibility that maybe the enormously widespread vaccination could have negative consequences with a small portion of its recipients…. Especially top level athletes? It’s weird!
@TheGlare_TM@RonFilipkowski Why are you so defensive of big pharma? Why would anyone be so assertive against the possibility that maybe the enormously widespread vaccination could have negative consequences with a small portion of its recipients…. Especially top level athletes? It’s weird!
@MarinoForUS @JReinerMD Why are you so defensive of big pharma? Why would anyone be so assertive against the possibility that maybe the enormously widespread vaccination could have negative consequences with a small portion of its recipients…. Especially top level athletes? It’s weird!
@benryanwriter@catturd2 Why are you so defensive of big pharma? Why would anyone be so assertive against the possibility that maybe the enormously widespread vaccination could have negative consequences with a small portion of its recipients…. Especially top level athletes? Weird man
@RyanClifford Hockey shoulder pads / sternum protection vs. modern football shoulder pad cushioning is apples to oranges. Not to mention the rate of speed (impact) from a hockey puck vs the shoulder pad impact area on opp player collision during the tackle. Baseballs, pucks…not pad impact
@RepMTG One in 200 million chance of this occurring (odds increase exponentially in relating commotio c. occurring with heavily cushioned shoulder pad protection covering the sternum). It’s weird that so many are hell bent on such an implausible scenario. Crusading against open dialogue
@EWErickson One in 200 million chance of this occurring. You don’t have to be an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers. Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in room the is also bonkers.
@DashDobrofsky One in 200 million chance of this occurring. You don’t have to be an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers. Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in the room is also bonkers.
@JennyChase12 @elijahbowie@cbouzy One in 200 million chance of this occurring. You don’t have to be an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers. Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in room the is also bonkers.
@elijahbowie@cbouzy One in 200 million chance of this occurring. You don’t have to be an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers. Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in room the is also bonkers.
@cbouzy One in 200 million chance of this occurring. Doesn’t take an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers man! Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in the room = bonkers. Seems conspiratorial to go so hard on diff perspectives
@CraigRozniecki One in 200 million chance of this occurring. You don’t have to be an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers. Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in the room is also bonkers.
@RafCastagna One in 200 million chance of this occurring. You don’t have to be an MIT mathematician to consider an alternative causation. Those odds are bonkers. Demonizing people for talking about the elephant in room the is also bonkers.