system: https://t.co/zk1SA01fNB
built a fictional world for a character. here's what happened.
https://t.co/zk1SA01fNB's Lorebook feature rolled out in beta on July 24th, it lets you give a Character deep, structured knowledge of the world it belongs to: history, locations, other characters' backstories, all of it. instead of re-explaining your own lore every session, the Character just knows it.
action: open a Character you've created on https://t.co/uYlSA7bh4l → check for the Lorebook tab (beta) → add entries for places, history, side characters → the Character pulls from those entries automatically mid-chat instead of you retyping context every time.
tradeoff: it rolled out to c.ai+ subscribers first, so free-tier access might lag behind. also, swipe regenerations now cost Charms, an in-app currency, so don't burn them testing lore entries you're not committed to yet.
takeaway: the actual annoying part of long roleplay was never memory length. it was re-explaining your own world every time. this is the first feature that actually fixes that instead of just making the chat log longer.
@HYPEX@ShiinaBR fortnite players on october 2:
"i don't need another skin"
also fortnite players on october 2 after seeing gold punk:
pulls out the v-bucks card
@CODUpdates opening the black ops 7 patch notes to see if they finally fixed the one thing that has been annoying me for 4 months
patch notes: fixed an unrelated calling card issue
78 days until gta vi.
rockstar just dropped a nearly 27-minute extended look and somehow the internet still wants to analyze every frame like it's the zapruder film.
november 19 cannot come fast enough.
78 days. not that i'm counting.
@IGN bodycam players after seeing the "locked and loaded" trailer:
"i'll just play one game"
3 hours later:
still crouched in the same corner waiting for footsteps.
@MeBillaVenkat Clipto's numbers are the interesting part.
$250m valuation
$15m ARR
30m users
profitable
21 employees
the business isn't selling more content. it's solving the retrieval problem created by too much content.
@GoogleAI security teams don't need another model that tells them where the vulnerability is.
they need one that can write the patch, test it, and get it into production without creating three new problems.
that's the real ai security race.
@omarsar0 "agents that build their own harness" sounds like the bigger story, but the actual finding is the boring one: generated harnesses still lose to human-engineered ones on code and research. that's the part people will skip past to hype the framing
system: AI productivity tools : n8n for chaining models together
the problem
kept manually copying output from one ai tool into another, research in perplexity, draft in claude, paste image prompts into gemini, all by hand.
the fix
n8n lets you build a visual workflow that chains these calls automatically, one tool's output becomes the next tool's input, no manual copy-paste in between.
action
sign up at https://t.co/trANJxcIBf (free self-hosted, or cloud tier), drag in an HTTP Request node pointed at one api, connect its output to a second node calling another api, run it once as a test before automating the trigger.
tradeoff
pro: once built, a multi-tool workflow runs itself, genuinely removes the manual handoff step.
con: real setup time upfront, each api needs its own auth/key configured correctly, this isn't a five-minute toggle.
takeaway
spent an afternoon building it, saved the copy-paste dance every day since. front-loaded cost, ongoing payoff.
system: grok voice : the limits myth
the problem
kept seeing "grok voice gives you 15 min free, 120 min on supergrok" repeated everywhere, assumed it was still true.
the fix
that daily-cap system got switched off. since june 2026, paid accounts run on one shared weekly usage pool across chat, imagine, and voice combined, instead of separate daily limits per feature. most guides online still haven't caught up.
action
check xai's own consumer faq directly before trusting any "grok gives you X minutes" claim you read secondhand, the actual system changed and a lot of content didn't.
tradeoff
pro: one shared pool is simpler to track than juggling separate daily caps per feature.
con: shared pool means heavy voice use eats into your text/image allowance too, worth watching if you use all three regularly.
takeaway
almost repeated a stat that's been wrong since june. checked the source instead. small habit, saves you from being confidently outdated.
@polydao worth remembering these testimonials, including millennium's, were curated by anthropic themselves, not independent third party benchmarks. genuinely impressive story, still worth treating as a selected highlight, not a controlled test
@ericciarla "only useful if i can inspect traces" is the actual bar most eval tools fail right now, most just hand you a score and expect trust, not a way to verify it
system: raycast : AI commands for repetitive prompts
the problem
kept alt-tabbing to chatgpt for the same 4 prompts, all day, every day, grammar fix, summarize, explain this error.
the fix
raycast's ai commands let you save a reusable prompt as a keyboard-triggered action, no browser tab, no app switch, just the hotkey and the result.
action
open raycast (option+space default) → search "create ai command" → name it, write the prompt once, e.g. "fix grammar in the following text: {selection}" → set a hotkey → next time, select text, hit the hotkey, done.
tradeoff
pro: cuts out the entire "switch app, paste, wait, copy back" loop, genuinely saves time on things you do dozens of times a day.
con: pro tier is required for unlimited ai commands, $10/month, free tier gives you a limited number of ai messages to test before you commit.
takeaway
automated the four prompts i typed most. didn't touch the big automation this week. sometimes the small annoying thing is the actual win.
visual: screen recording — creating an AI Command in Raycast, then triggering it via hotkey on selected text