Tim Cauldwell

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @gill1109 @Mscjervis What’s wrong with addressing both? And if he promised in his video to engage and then refuses to, that makes the ‘who is he’ question even more valid

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@gill1109 @mervynpervyn @Bungles71 @NickBarberX But *15* deaths? What? I thought there were only 13 total that happened on the unit in the relevant period?

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@kazbahellis You should give this one a try, it’s the best TV documentary about the case:

https://t.co/QaMOFatAfy

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 Well, can’t blame them for having not yet uncovered the obscure source material that is BBC Panorama

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 I think it’s the right decision. I’d say thanks but part of me is still a bit uncomfortable about helping the guilters 😂

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 I think his last two sentences are in dispute. He doesn’t know about the test issues so thinks you can make a clean inference from an immonoassay result. That looks like supporting the prosecution to me.

Idk I just like your list but this still looks like a gap in it to me

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 It honestly sounds like he simply doesn’t know about the natural ways a test can produce those readings. To me it doesn’t look like he’s simply saying the uncontroversial ‘high insulin low c-peptide usually indicates exogenous administration’.

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 There’s also this bit further down actually

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 Hm I’m sure about that. I don’t trust Moritz much but it seems reasonable to assume Gregory wasn’t completely in the dark about what he was being asked about

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 Transcript of his take here:
https://t.co/ueN7K0Z645

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 Endocrinologist who seemed to back the prosecution in the last Panorama

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@ContrarianJolly @sueklo1122 Shouldn’t John Gregory be on there?

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@PhillAndry86 @BrettKnoss @LBC @amandaknox @TomSwarbrick1 Because each piece of the evidence against her has been dismantled by dozens of experts. The context of this video is that Amanda has done a podcast all about how unsafe the convictions are.

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@DebRoberts22249 @guyrowlanduk @DrSusanOliver1 I can’t seem to find these quotes anywhere. Where are they from?

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@DrSusanOliver1 I’m wondering whether a few of your claims come from studies that do the same. Whether the method detects bound insulin too is of crucial importance here.

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@DrSusanOliver1 There’s a lot to look into here, but a first thing worth noting is that you justify the claim that non-igG binding is not associated with unusually high levels of insulin with a source (Wellik et al) that seems to have measured *free* insulin.

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@benshep20 @ValidateYaModel @triedbystats non-malicious explanation for F and L’s results.

[Tim Cauldwell @TCauldwell18173]

@benshep20 @ValidateYaModel @triedbystats I haven’t read the full paper so I don’t know where exactly the number comes from. But it seems pretty obvious that inverted ratios are common.
This fact is highly relevant because, in conjunction with other facts (about antibodies, sepsis, etc), it demonstrates a plausible,