@Richard37247328@colin332759@BirdSeedBigot There’s mention of a rip as well. The arrest is just standard investigative practice to ascertain if it was a factor. There’s a lot to confirm why try and fill in the gaps. A rip would be a very plausible explanation for that number. Wash on top of a rip certainly would not help.
@colin332759@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot Yep no point trying to reason. Seems he’s just dismissing logical and reasonable explanations without any justification. I don’t know what he’s trying to say? Police are lying? What? Why? Just nonsense. The story is so simple.
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot Why does it matter? You haven’t really explained, other than you believe one or both statements to be false. regardless of the semantics of the police statement regarding pier jumping I don’t see how it’s relevant it clearly was not the cause of death and injury.
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot I don’t understand what it is you’re looking for? Some kind of conspiracy? Police lying? What? I think all they are attempting to say (albeit not brilliantly) is that jumping in the water was not a direct cause of the incident. Why does it need to be anything other than that?
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot Kids were in water. Vessel sailed too close abd inside designated recreation area. Created wash. Young people got in to difficulty as a result and sadly drowned. Captain arrrested. Standard practice. That’s the full story. Not sure what else it is you’re looking for.
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot If everyone was already in the water when the incident happened how would there be a suggestion of jumping from pier being a factor of the incident. How they got in the water prior to the incident is not relevant to the investigation?
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot Now you’re trolling me by calling me a clown? What you want. I said police would not have immediately been aware if all parties were in water. The statement says jumping in from pier was not a direct factor of the incident which is true? What you want me to say. Chill man.
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot I don’t know what you want me to say? No it isn’t. The police are simply saying jumping in was not a factor of the accident which it wasn’t. The kids are saying the accident was not a result of a direct incident with a boat which it wasn’t both statements are true. I’m sure.
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot As far as the police are concerned all victims were already in water so jumping from pier was not necessarily known abd not a factor in the incident. So no conflict here, just different statements but both accurate. What is it you’re looking for?
@Richard37247328@BirdSeedBigot Still not complicated in terms of the arrest. Clearly captain of a vessel being investigated. How they got in the water not relevant. How they came to harm is. Hence captain arrest for being deemed too close to designated recreational area. That is simple.
@Richard37247328 100% boats by law are required to keep a safe distance from designated swimming areas off the beach. Wash has led to injury and death equals captain arrested. Standard practice. This was pretty obvious without this footage. Investigation of whether wash was factor.
@Bitfinexed If he’s made a lot of money and that wealth is ring fenced from this mess then the simple answer is yes, can be dressed any way people like, but he’s rich and many people are broke. He sails of on to the sun on his rug 👋
@stablekwon Delusional post. Project ded. Just trying to make it not look like a rug when they’re no longer interested in the ded ‘decevtralised’ ponzi. Anyone who’s lost in this mess needs to regather. This isn’t the first crypto project to implode and won’t be the last. Risk is real. RIP
@XForceGlobal Bad for those who’ve been caught, it’s ded. It shows this can literally happen to any asset, large or small and people still don’t want a regulated industry? 😆