@Dhanan_jayan_@ilaiyaraaja Raaja's Telugu Song#2.
Vamsi + Ilaiyaraaja combo produced great soundtracks in the 80s - Sitara, Anveshana, Preminchu Pelladu, Aalapana, Ladies Taylor, Maharshi.
Vayyari Godaramma is a special song from this combo!
https://t.co/GG1xaVy4Cc
@Dhanan_jayan_@ilaiyaraaja Day 19. Kannada song.
While Naguva Nayana from Pallavi Anu Pallavi is the ultimate GOAT song, Nagu Enthidhe from the same movie is a gem.
https://t.co/zsrAfSSNDw
People have asked me whether Claude Cowork will follow the same explosive adoption as Claude Code. I think the trajectory will look different. Not because Cowork isn’t powerful, but because enterprise work is fundamentally different from engineering. Claude Code took off in part because engineering is a builder-native environment. Engineers know how to stitch tools together, write scripts, debug failures, and turn incomplete systems into something useful.
That matters because much of today’s AI still requires real implementation work around the model: workflow design, tool configuration, integrations, validation, and iteration.
Most other functions are in a very different position. Sales, HR, finance, legal, and operations teams are not short on valuable use cases. But they are not set up (and should not have to) piece together workflows across fragmented tools just to get value from AI.
That is the deeper challenge in enterprise adoption. It is not just that enterprise environments are more fragmented, though they are. It is that most enterprise users are not builders. Engineers can often work around gaps in the product. Most other functions cannot be expected to. Their work already spans CRM, Slack, docs, spreadsheets, meetings, ticketing systems, internal tools, and legacy systems—all with different permissions, interfaces, and sources of truth. So the burden shifts.
In enterprise settings, the product has to do much more of the work. It has to carry context across systems, respect permissions, orchestrate reliably, and produce outputs people can trust—without requiring the user to build the workflow themselves.
Australian cricket will consider raising millions of dollars from wagering product fees to get closer to the levels of gambling revenue scooped up by the NRL and AFL, amid debate on whether to sell BBL clubs.
https://t.co/TF37llcze8