@ParrettGost@fanalyzesports He was actually throwing a timing route in which the receiver was supposed to drive hard back to the ball instead of floating at the top but yeah, shouldn’t have thrown it knowing that receiver wasn’t coming back aggressively. Definitely shouldn’t have put it on the back shoulder
@ParrettGost@fanalyzesports That doesn’t qualify as triple coverage. If it did, any time a receiver caught a ball in the soft spot of a zone it would be considered as such, or at least double coverage. It wasn’t a good throw but there wasn’t anything wrong with the decision
@TOSD4L@gabem602@Pac12Refugee@LoBoJangles@grok More importantly than speculative roster costs is the fact that they’re similarly talented. So, whatever they are spending, they aren’t that far off in terms of what the money is acquiring
@TOSD4L@gabem602@Pac12Refugee@LoBoJangles I’ll always be an ASU fan. I’ll refute your point more directly. Reports are that IU spent around $32M on this roster while ASU was around $25M
We should be able to compete with that if IU can. Your opinion is baseless and objectively wrong
@TOSD4L@gabem602@Pac12Refugee@LoBoJangles It’s pretty well reported what both ASU and Indiana are spending on players. I urge you to look into that before you make the speculative claim that Indiana has a billionaire’s support and therefore they’re spending way more than ASU